On Wednesday 05 December 2007 06:15:49 SydSandy wrote:
Can we add a /controls/gear/gear-lever-lock to prevent accidental
raising
gear while on the ground , on aircraft that have this feature ? The key
bindings can be over ridden , but there's also joystick configurations to
consider
Hi All,
The latest and greatest chat menu system is now available. I have added a couple
of new features and fixed a number of bugs:
- The chat menu automagically creates messages that include the nearest airport,
the current runway in use (based on the current weather conditions), and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Tim Moore wrote:
Hello,
http://www.bricoworks.com/moore/0001-OSG-pager-megapatch.patch is a patch
against current
flightgear that uses the OSG database pager to load scenery tiles instead of
the old
tile loader. The main advantage of the
Am Dienstag, den 04.12.2007, 22:46 +0100 schrieb Melchior FRANZ:
* Durk Talsma -- Tuesday 04 December 2007:
data/Aircraft/737-300 \
Yes, I'd swap that with the 787. A flat panel that disappears
when you look left/right is hard to bear. (Though I miss a VOR
display on the
On mer 5 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Jon S. Berndt -- Wednesday 05 December 2007:
I believe recent enhancements and fixes in JSBSim may have
fixed the F-16, but I'm not sure.
Well, not in FlightGear's CVS, though it may have improved
a bit. BTW: I reported that problem a least
On mer 5 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Jon S. Berndt -- Wednesday 05 December 2007:
I wonder if it is a platform-specific issue?
Extremely unlikely.
But this could play a role: my js has the centering spring
deactivated. So, when I have the f16 parked, this is often
with elevator
* Jon S. Berndt -- Wednesday 05 December 2007:
If the F16 is broken now it should not be included.
It shouldn't be hard for someone with some JSBSim insight to
fix it. When I told Dave about the problem, he suggested to
replace the elevator FCS part by the one of the 737, and this
did indeed
About f16-3d I just tried again it, flying with it 15 minutes over the
Mediterranean sea from LFTH, i did not notice the problems you have.
I confirm that it is a nice Model to fly, probably easier than the
real one.
Does it mean that the computer configuration is involved ? the FDM
* gerard robin -- Wednesday 05 December 2007:
Don't we have to take care, and to keep a balance like it was before ?
You mean, we have to ship FlightGear v1.0 with as many broken aircraft
as working ones, for balancing reasons? :-}
m.
* Detlef Faber -- Wednesday 05 December 2007:
Am Dienstag, den 04.12.2007, 22:46 +0100 schrieb Melchior FRANZ:
Hmm ... it's well done and all, but I think it's too realistic,
read: too hard to take off/land due to the very narrow gear.
Well, that's how an aircraft with 1700 hp and a wing
* Melchior FRANZ -- Wednesday 05 December 2007:
my js has the centering spring deactivated. [...]
Of course, I expect now someone to point out that most people
don't have their springs removed, so we can ship the f16 as is.
And I can't even disagree ... strongly. :-)
m.
* Jon S. Berndt -- Wednesday 05 December 2007:
I wonder if it is a platform-specific issue?
Extremely unlikely.
But this could play a role: my js has the centering spring
deactivated. So, when I have the f16 parked, this is often
with elevator and ailerons fully applied in one direction.
This
On mar 4 décembre 2007, Ron Jensen wrote:
I haven't made much time lately for this project... If someone with
write access would like to put this aircraft into CVS, they have my
permission. I'm been meaning to have it put in...
Ron Jensen
Because i love it (and i have cvs access), I
On mer 5 décembre 2007, Ron Jensen wrote:
On Wed, 2007-12-05 at 14:50 +0100, gerard robin wrote:
On mar 4 décembre 2007, Ron Jensen wrote:
I haven't made much time lately for this project... If someone with
write access would like to put this aircraft into CVS, they have my
* Jon S. Berndt -- Wednesday 05 December 2007:
If the F16 is broken now it should not be included.
It shouldn't be hard for someone with some JSBSim insight to
fix it. When I told Dave about the problem, he suggested to
replace the elevator FCS part by the one of the 737, and this
did
Hi, that would be fine if i coud have the files, i think i can set up X,
but i need things to tell OSG witch screen to use, it always use the
fist one, and sometimes i woul'd like to run FG on the smaller screen.
thanks for the answers.
John Wojnaroski a écrit :
Hi,
OK, I've just starting
On 12/04/2007 11:26 PM, SydSandy wrote:
Hi all , I've added the elevator, aileron and rudder trim to the
control-centering function - keypad ( 5 ). Should this be added
before the release ? Or is there a particular reason that the trims
aren't reset ?
There is _some_ merit to this idea, but
Anders Gidenstam a écrit :
Hi,
I think the previous proposal was to reconfigure X to see both screens as
one big X screen (e.g as NVidia TwinView does).
I don't have the same resolution on the two screens, that's why I use
dual head display. (1280x1024 and 1024x768)
However, it would
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 18:21:45 -
Vivian Meazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Denker
Sent: 05 December 2007 16:43
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] control trim reset
On 12/04/2007 11:26 PM, SydSandy wrote:
Hi all , I've added the
There has been some discussion of the F-16 working badly. I took another
look at it over lunch. I think I have found one bug (which is not to
say, the only bug). There are several integrators used in the control
laws. These should have wind-up protection set up (which they don't).
But, apart from
--- Curtis Olson wrote:
On Dec 5, 2007 7:49 AM, alexis bory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
The A-10 is now so feature rich that a comprehensive help/manual
wouldn't fit in a single dialog. Readme files could help but they lake
of graphics. So I started to use the wiki as the main
Vivian Meazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in part;
... (not that I use it very often) ...
On 12/05/2007 02:59 PM, SydSandy wrote:
ok that answers my question I thought it was more a user option to
center joystick , etc...
Maybe I'm missing something, but I thought 5 was a
mouse-only
jean pellotier a crit:
Anders Gidenstam a crit :
However, it would not be good if FlightGear/OSG cannot be instructed which
X screen to start on. Have you tried setting DISPLAY ?
yes I did, setting DISPLAY to :0.1 other programs work but not
FG-cvs-OSG, i will try
Hi Stuart,
I can't quite get out of the starting gate with this.
Preferences.xmlreferences files in the ATC subdir, but the
tar.gz puts this all in the chatmenu subdir. And even when I try to patch
up the paths, I get a Dialog: chat-menu not defined when I try to bring up
the dialog box. So
* AnMaster -- Wednesday 05 December 2007:
Well osgviewer got other key issues as mentioned earlier on both
-devel [...] and sdl got problems with non-US keyboard layouts.
Unlikely. I doubt that Swedish keyboards are so special. German
keyboards have that AltGr abomination as well, and I don't
I did a valgrind run on 'JSBSim --script=scripts/f16_runway_test.xml'
since missing initializations has caused unpredictable errors before.
It doesn't look too bad - there are a few hits in FGFilter (but in the
Debug() function) and one in FGLGear and one in FGTurbine - I think these
warrant
* AnMaster -- Wednesday 05 December 2007:
We should first decide what keys are reserved for user, I
used - locally so I need to know what is now free instead.
At least leave _ free then...
All mod-meta and mod-super combinations are free. A few
hundred free keys ought to be enough for anybody
* AnMaster -- Wednesday 05 December 2007:
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
All mod-meta and mod-super combinations are free.
I don't have any of those keys on my keyboard... Most PC
keyboards don't
On the contrary: most have them. There's a burning flag on
them. Not that they work with obsolete glut
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I don't have any of those keys on my keyboard... Most PC keyboards don't
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* AnMaster -- Wednesday 05 December 2007:
We should first decide what keys are reserved for user, I
used - locally so I need to know what is now free
On Dec 5, 2007 7:49 AM, alexis bory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
The A-10 is now so feature rich that a comprehensive help/manual
wouldn't fit in a single dialog. Readme files could help but they lake
of graphics. So I started to use the wiki as the main help source.
So now the
* gerard robin -- Wednesday 05 December 2007:
Only waiting an agreement from one of these persons .
Go ahead. I'd like to have that, too. :-)
m.
-
SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper
On mer 5 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* gerard robin -- Wednesday 05 December 2007:
Don't we have to take care, and to keep a balance like it was before ?
You mean, we have to ship FlightGear v1.0 with as many broken aircraft
as working ones, for balancing reasons? :-}
m.
Broken
On mer 5 décembre 2007, Berndt, Jon S wrote:
There has been some discussion of the F-16 working badly. I took another
look at it over lunch. I think I have found one bug (which is not to
say, the only bug). There are several integrators used in the control
laws. These should have wind-up
Yes, the selection should be balanced. A representative of
every class that the users would be interested in, especially
well done ones (with 3D cockpit) that don't consume excessive
disk space, but more importantly: download volume. And they
should be flyable, too.
I couldn't care less
* gerard robin -- Wednesday 05 December 2007:
On mer 5 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
You mean, we have to ship FlightGear v1.0 with as many broken aircraft
as working ones, for balancing reasons? :-}
Broken ???
I don't understand, these aircraft are not broken.
That was just
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* AnMaster -- Wednesday 05 December 2007:
Well osgviewer got other key issues as mentioned earlier on both
-devel [...] and sdl got problems with non-US keyboard layouts.
Unlikely. I doubt that Swedish keyboards are so
* Jon S. Berndt -- Wednesday 05 December 2007:
I believe recent enhancements and fixes in JSBSim may have
fixed the F-16, but I'm not sure.
Well, not in FlightGear's CVS, though it may have improved
a bit. BTW: I reported that problem a least twice to Erik and
once to Dave.
m.
On mer 5 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* gerard robin -- Wednesday 05 December 2007:
On mer 5 décembre 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
You mean, we have to ship FlightGear v1.0 with as many broken aircraft
as working ones, for balancing reasons? :-}
Broken ???
I don't
* AnMaster -- Wednesday 05 December 2007:
Where would you recommend searching for the problem with SDL?
I got no idea where to start with that
Given that we will/should drop both glut and sdl support, I wouldn't
waste time for sdl.
m.
On mer 5 décembre 2007, Berndt, Jon S wrote:
There has been some discussion of the F-16 working badly. I took
another
look at it over lunch. I think I have found one bug (which is not to
say, the only bug). There are several integrators used in the
control
laws. These should have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* AnMaster -- Wednesday 05 December 2007:
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
All mod-meta and mod-super combinations are free.
I don't have any of those keys on my keyboard... Most PC
keyboards don't
On the contrary: most have
Hi all ,
In case I wasn't too clear previously ,what i was proposing for the
gear lever lock was to add something like this to the controls.nas file ...
var gearDown = func(v) {
if(getprop(/controls/gear/gear-lever-lock))return;
if (v 0) {
Hi all,
The A-10 is now so feature rich that a comprehensive help/manual
wouldn't fit in a single dialog. Readme files could help but they lake
of graphics. So I started to use the wiki as the main help source.
So now the question is, would it be a good idea to give a the wiki url
in the A-10
On Dec 5, 2007 3:33 PM, John Denker wrote:
Maybe I'm missing something, but I thought 5 was a
mouse-only solution to a mouse-only problem.
5 is a solution to a keybaord control issue, and it can come in handy for
people that use a mouse too ... if done carefully. It should be useless for
On Dec 5, 2007 12:01 AM, Tim Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nevertheless, the patch is quite usable with OSG 2.2. Give it a try if you're
feeling
adventurous.
ATC aircraft doesn't work, the splash screen gets stuck at loading
scenery and never disappears (waited some 10 minutes).
Found this Looks Interesting
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=Rwe81LzTH5w
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=Y18gu2Dgq8E
Regards: Aerotro
See http://uk.youtube.com/user/aceBryan7ox for more parts.
Online FlightGear Simulator Tracker Page.
http://mpserver04.flightgear.org
46 matches
Mail list logo
