Re: [Flightgear-devel] Legacy #ifdefs

2008-08-30 Thread James Turner
On 30 Aug 2008, at 20:21, Martin Spott wrote: I've compiled a tiny package. This includes the compiler error output on Solaris10/SunStudio11 for those source files where it fails plus the single system header that is listed in the respective complaints: http://foxtrot.mgras.net/static/SimG

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Patch: Minor bugfixes for MSVC compatibility

2008-08-30 Thread James Turner
On 30 Aug 2008, at 23:16, Stefan C. Müller wrote: >> As far as I can tell, this is not true. The third parameter type is >> independant from the type of the container, and should only match >> the type of the second parameter of the predicate. The current code >> compile under MSVC 7.1 and

Re: [Flightgear-devel] segfault at LFPG

2008-08-30 Thread gerard robin
On jeu 28 août 2008, Durk Talsma wrote: > Hi Tim, > > On Wednesday 27 August 2008 15:37:19 Tim Moore wrote: > > This is great! We can't call osgDB:SharedStateManager::share from the > > database pager thread. I'll check in a fix soon. > > Great to hear that this stack trace was useful. :-) > > Chee

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Patch: Minor bugfixes for MSVC compatibility

2008-08-30 Thread Stefan C. Müller
Frederic Bouvier schrieb: > Hi Stefan, > > - "Stefan C. Müller" a écrit : > >> Small patch fixing bugs I've encountered while getting the current CVS >> to build in MSVC. >> * std::lower_bound was used with the key-type of a map, but >> lower_bound expects the value-type of the collection it

Re: [Flightgear-devel] GIT

2008-08-30 Thread Martin Spott
Christian Schmitt wrote: > Stefan C. M?ller wrote: > > That's of course the safest choise for binary files. But it would > > certainly mess up the text files. > > While most windows tools can read LF, they all write CRLF by default, > > some even to automatic conversion (like VC). We would end u

Re: [Flightgear-devel] GIT

2008-08-30 Thread Stefan C. Müller
Christian Schmitt schrieb: > Huh? From my experience it is more the other way around. I saw many > Windows tool that displayed LF fext incorrectly but I have never seen a > CRLF text in Linux being messed up. What exactly do you mean by "all the > linux tools"? > Not "all" of them of course,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] GIT

2008-08-30 Thread Frederic Bouvier
- "Frederic Bouvier" a écrit : > - "Stefan C. Müller" a écrit : > > Thomas schrieb: > > > Thanks for that review. I'm still wary of the auto line term > > > conversion and would probably favor disabling it. > > > > > That's of course the safest choise for binary files. But it would > > cert

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Patch: Minor bugfixes for MSVC compatibility

2008-08-30 Thread Frederic Bouvier
Hi Stefan, - "Stefan C. Müller" a écrit : > Small patch fixing bugs I've encountered while getting the current CVS > to build in MSVC. > * std::lower_bound was used with the key-type of a map, but > lower_bound expects the value-type of the collection it works on, with is > std::pair. MSVC see

Re: [Flightgear-devel] GIT

2008-08-30 Thread Christian Schmitt
Stefan C. Müller wrote: > That's of course the safest choise for binary files. But it would > certainly mess up the text files. > While most windows tools can read LF, they all write CRLF by default, > some even to automatic conversion (like VC). We would end up having > files of both types (an

Re: [Flightgear-devel] GIT

2008-08-30 Thread Frederic Bouvier
- "Stefan C. Müller" a écrit : > Thomas schrieb: > > Thanks for that review. I'm still wary of the auto line term > > conversion and would probably favor disabling it. > > > That's of course the safest choise for binary files. But it would > certainly mess up the text files. > While most wi

[Flightgear-devel] Patch: Minor bugfixes for MSVC compatibility

2008-08-30 Thread Stefan C. Müller
Small patch fixing bugs I've encountered while getting the current CVS to build in MSVC. * std::lower_bound was used with the key-type of a map, but lower_bound expects the value-type of the collection it works on, with is std::pair. MSVC seems to be more strict about this. * Added an missing i

Re: [Flightgear-devel] GIT

2008-08-30 Thread Stefan C. Müller
Thomas schrieb: > Thanks for that review. I'm still wary of the auto line term > conversion and would probably favor disabling it. > That's of course the safest choise for binary files. But it would certainly mess up the text files. While most windows tools can read LF, they all write CRLF by d

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Legacy #ifdefs

2008-08-30 Thread Martin Spott
Martin Spott wrote: > Tim Moore wrote: > > IRIX (and Solaris and HP) compilers are still used by some of our > > developers, > > and they have their own set of special bugs. > > I've compiled a tiny package. This includes the compiler error output > on Solaris10/SunStudio11 for those source fi

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-cvslogs] CVS: source/src/Sound fg_fx.cxx, 1.27, 1.28 fg_fx.hxx, 1.18, 1.19

2008-08-30 Thread Ron Jensen
On Fri, 2008-08-22 at 04:50 -0500, Erik Hofman wrote: > Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/source/src/Sound > In directory baron.flightgear.org:/tmp/cvs-serv25361 > > Modified Files: > fg_fx.cxx fg_fx.hxx > Log Message: > Nothing fancy, it all seemed to work properly already... > > Index: f

Re: [Flightgear-devel] f16 speedbrakes

2008-08-30 Thread Alex Romosan
Erik Hofman writes: > Alex Romosan wrote: >> can you give me a pointer as to where i could get this data? thanks. >> > Search for NASA Technical Paper 1538 thanks. --alex-- -- | I believe the moment is at hand when, by a paranoiac and active | | advance of the mind, it will be possible (si

Re: [Flightgear-devel] AI Carrier and solid Objects

2008-08-30 Thread gerard robin
On ven 22 août 2008, gerard robin wrote: > Hello, > > AI Carrier wants the definition > That definition gives to the Aircraft the solid material which is > necessary to land, to taxis and to take off (mainly the deck and hangar). > That definition is useful too, to define the main obs

Re: [Flightgear-devel] f16 speedbrakes

2008-08-30 Thread Erik Hofman
Fabian Grodek wrote: > > Erik, > In the F16 aero config file I see there's indeed an increase in lift > for certain speedbrakes deflection, accompanied by the expected huge > increase in drag. But I don't see any pitching moment effect; from > what I see in NASA TP 1538

Re: [Flightgear-devel] f16 speedbrakes

2008-08-30 Thread Fabian Grodek
On 8/29/08, Erik Hofman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > What happens (with regard to the fly-by-wire system) is this: > > Speedbrake deflection causes a pitching moment which the FCS > automatically compensates because there is no pitching moment requested > by the pilot. > > Erik Erik, In the F

Re: [Flightgear-devel] f16 speedbrakes

2008-08-30 Thread Erik Hofman
Alex Romosan wrote: > can you give me a pointer as to where i could get this data? thanks. > Search for NASA Technical Paper 1538 Erik - This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Zeppelin NT (ZLT-NT) update

2008-08-30 Thread DrC
Just lurking - saw the following post, and thought you might appreciate a little local colour... http://www.bedfordtoday.co.uk/bed-news/Zeppelin-airship-graces-the-skies.4436055.jp http://www.staroverlondon.co.uk/ Chris. On Fri, 2008-08-29 at 23:56 +0200, Ralf Gerlich wrote: > Hi! > > Martin S