On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 12:16 -0800, Syd wrote:
> James Turner wrote:\
> > Case in point - in the Citation Bravo, there's all manner of strange
> > alerts - I get bank angle alerts on take off, and loads of 'too low,
> > flaps', 'glideslope' and 'bank angle' warnings on finals. I'm not all
> >
I just added a system.xml to the Bravo which sets the vacuum to use N1
instead of rpm , scale set to 20.0 and the flood of messages at takeoff
stopped ... it seems to behave properly again . I'll test more tomorrow
... staff party tonight , so nothing will get done tonight :)
-
James Turner wrote:\
> Case in point - in the Citation Bravo, there's all manner of strange
> alerts - I get bank angle alerts on take off, and loads of 'too low,
> flaps', 'glideslope' and 'bank angle' warnings on finals. I'm not all
> the way there with understand what is happening, but a m
Fabian Grodek wrote:
> I'm using Tortoise.
> Can somebody tell me what should be the command line? Something like:
> :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/cvs/FlightGear..
> Thank you.
> Fabian
Look at the http://www.flightgear.org/cvs/anoncvs.html
___
Hi,
i was testing on my local airport (coastal, less terrain) with ufo, let me
test on inland airport (LEMD, madrid) with 172.
Im running with the patch that reduces precision for fgrunway, no longer can
we measure runway length in
super-cords widths, only upto 10 nanometers ;)
Memory (private by
On 5 Dec 2008, at 16:01, Yon Uriarte wrote:
> Excellent idea. With the patch and some other changes it saves 100MB
> over terrain, less over ocean.
> That's just after the scenery has finished loading, should be more
> over time.
Good gracious. 100MB? That seems almost impossibly large.
Thi
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 3:25 PM, Csaba Halász <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 3:58 AM, Yon Uriarte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > One big contributor to size is SGAtomic. On windows it's 32 bytes for a
> 4
> > byte counter. That makes SGReferenced 32 bytes, too, for an
On 5 Dec 2008, at 14:48, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> BTW - I've found the source of a long-standing bug were changing the
> weather scenario when real-weather-fetch was enabled didn't work.
Wooo! Fantastic!
James
--
I've spent some time trying to understand the spurious alerts the Mk-
VIII sometimes produces. I'm hopeful that with a little bit of love,
and some better documentation, more aircraft developers will be able
to use this (rather complex) beast in their aircraft.
My major impression from workin
Curt wrote:
> I did think of that after scratching my head a while ... the metar reported
> several cloud layers and
> I did try to switch to a new location as well as switching to fair weather
> and thunderstorm ...
> I did get snow and rain, but with a perfectly clear sky.
I think there's a
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 3:27 PM, Hart, Gordon (UK)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> FGMultiplayer::MP_ProcessData: No such file or directory
>
> Not only can I not find this particular message in the source, but I am
> at a loss over which file this recorded network traffic may be provoking
> FG to lo
On 5 Dec 2008, at 14:23, Yon Uriarte wrote:
> a little patch for the update callback, this time in a readable
> and #ifdef'ed format.
> The update time goes down from 10ms to 1ms on this machine. Fog is
> still applied.
I'd just like to say, this kind of work is appreciated, and much
nee
>Frederic Bouvier wrote:
>Note, even with this option selected, if you rebuild any part of SG, a
full
>FG rebuild will occur. I have not found a way to preclude this.
Actually, I've managed to modify my project to prevent a full rebuild
should only a small part be modified. If I alter the Prope
Hi Stuart,
a little patch for the update callback, this time in a readable and
#ifdef'ed format.
The update time goes down from 10ms to 1ms on this machine. Fog is still
applied.
Bonus: trivial patch for annoying unsigned warnings.
greetings,
yon
clouds.patch
Description: Binary data
-
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 3:11 PM, gerard robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On vendredi 05 décembre 2008, you wrote:
> > the usual process is
> > cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9
> login
> > answering guest to pasword request
> > and
> > cvs -d :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 6:31 AM, Fabian Grodek wrote:
> Hello,
> I've been trying to checkout FlightGear source code from the CVS Repository
> but I always get the message:
>
> Logging in to :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:2401
> :/var/cvs/FlightGear
>
> cvs [login aborted]: /var/cvs/FlightGear: no such
Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> gerard robin wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>> I recently succeeded to build FG CVS with osg 2.7.5 and boost ( ouf , but
>> on
>> only one computer) .
>> I get that strange 3D clouds mapping , is it just me ?
>> http://pagesperso-orange.fr/GRTux/checkboard.jpg
>
> No, it's not
On vendredi 05 décembre 2008, you wrote:
> On vendredi 05 décembre 2008, Fabian Grodek wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I've been trying to checkout FlightGear source code from the CVS
> > Repository but I always get the message:
> >
> > Logging in to
> > :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:2401:/var/cvs/FlightGear
>
On vendredi 05 décembre 2008, Fabian Grodek wrote:
> Hello,
> I've been trying to checkout FlightGear source code from the CVS Repository
> but I always get the message:
>
> Logging in to :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:2401:/var/cvs/FlightGear
>
> cvs [login aborted]: /var/cvs/FlightGear: no such repos
Hello,
I've been trying to checkout FlightGear source code from the CVS Repository
but I always get the message:
Logging in to :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:2401:/var/cvs/FlightGear
cvs [login aborted]: /var/cvs/FlightGear: no such repository
A similar message I get also with Tortise client.
Can a
Hi,
osg::ref_ptr SGNewCloud::genCloud() {
...
+GeodeList* g = (*iter).second;
+
+if (iter == cloudMap.end() || g->size() < num_flavours)
...
dereferencing iterator::end is a no-no (it's not standard c++).
suggest:
GeodeList* g;// = (*iter).second;
if (iter == cloudMap.end() || (g
Frederic Bouvier wrote
> -Original Message-
> From: Frederic Bouvier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 04 December 2008 23:11
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Another simple question
>
>
> - "Gordon Hart (UK)" a écrit :
>
> > Hello again,
> >
22 matches
Mail list logo
