Re: [Flightgear-devel] an idea about dialog-apply command

2009-02-21 Thread Melchior FRANZ
I object to the proposed change. (Reasons below.) * Sébastien MARQUE -- 2/21/2009 2:39 AM: In this script you'll find several listeners linked to several properties that can be modified using instrument-failures.xml or system-failures.xml. Except that these are *not* change-only

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [PATCH] to enhance translate animation

2009-02-21 Thread Durk Talsma
Hi Torsten, Committed. Thanks! Cheers, Durk On Sunday 15 February 2009 20:01:11 Torsten Dreyer wrote: the rotate animation has two ways to define a axis 1. by using center/x-m and axis/[xyz] 2. by using axis/[xyz]1-m and axis/[xyz]2-m The translate animation only supports method 1. and

Re: [Flightgear-devel] an idea about dialog-apply command

2009-02-21 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Melchior FRANZ -- 2/21/2009 9:33 AM: You should have used: setlistener(f ~ /serviceable, failure[f], 0, 1); Whoops. Of course, I meant: setlistener(f ~ /serviceable, failure[f], 0, 0); The meaning of the first optional argument is: 0 ... just attach (default) 1 ...

Re: [Flightgear-devel] an idea about dialog-apply command

2009-02-21 Thread Sébastien MARQUE
Hi Csaba and Melchior, oops, sorry, I've made a mistake attaching the failures.nas script, but please believe me that I've first tried setlistener(f ~ /serviceable, failure[f], 0, 0); in order to behave as written in setlistener doc (wiki and globals.nas). I've just write back to correct

[Flightgear-devel] Property System Overview?

2009-02-21 Thread Curtis Olson
Do we have any documentation or overview of the property system that gives a high level view. I found something about the contents of the property tree on our wiki. There's probably some api documentation floating around. But what I really would like is a higher level description of what the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Property System Overview?

2009-02-21 Thread Torsten Dreyer
Pretend Curt is in a meeting and he's given 30 seconds to explain the property system to smart people who have never seen this concept before. I've just burned my first 15 seconds with U, er, It's like , you know Now all these smart people are scowling. Now what!?! I'd try

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Property System Overview?

2009-02-21 Thread LeeE
On Saturday 21 February 2009, Torsten Dreyer wrote: Pretend Curt is in a meeting and he's given 30 seconds to explain the property system to smart people who have never seen this concept before. I've just burned my first 15 seconds with U, er, It's like , you know Now all

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Property System Overview?

2009-02-21 Thread Tim Moore
LeeE wrote: On Saturday 21 February 2009, Torsten Dreyer wrote: Pretend Curt is in a meeting and he's given 30 seconds to explain the property system to smart people who have never seen this concept before. I've just burned my first 15 seconds with U, er, It's like , you know

Re: [Flightgear-devel] an idea about dialog-apply command

2009-02-21 Thread Csaba Halász
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 11:32 AM, Melchior FRANZ mfr...@aon.at wrote: setlistener(f ~ /serviceable, failure[f], 0, 0); 0 ... trigger on change only As I wrote in my other email, this doesn't work as expected. The listener is triggered initially even if the property doesn't change.

[Flightgear-devel] Patch for positioned.cxx

2009-02-21 Thread 黄志勇
Hi, Compiling the file positioned.cxx with MSVC in debug model, it have some problems. but in release model , it have not. I think that it is the problem of implementation of STL by Microsoft in debug model. So i add a method for class LowerLimitOfType, and it works. I'd be happy if someone

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Patch for positioned.cxx

2009-02-21 Thread Geoff McLane
Hi, I have been applying this patch since sometime before Sep last year - see - http://geoffair.net/fg/txt/fgfs-047.patch.txt IMHO the _MSC_VER and _DEBUG switches do NOT need to be applied. I am forever puzzled how gcc resolves this since the comparison is indeed two pointers ... diff -ur

Re: [Flightgear-devel] an idea about dialog-apply command

2009-02-21 Thread Sébastien MARQUE
Yes, I will be obliged to check the value to avoid the instrument fix in some cases. But as I discover this problem I wanted to try a solution for every dialog-apply, to make the listeners work as expected, for future uses, not only the failures system I'm trying to write. If the fix is

[Flightgear-devel] northern hemisphere vs southern hemisphere

2009-02-21 Thread BARANGER Emmanuel
Hi all, After some tests, I just discovered something amusing in FG. In fact, you do not know can be, but the gravity is reversed between the northern hemisphere and southern hemisphere. Finally it is the impression that it was ;) Look the Bo105 in northen hemisphere :

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Patch for positioned.cxx

2009-02-21 Thread Csaba Halász
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Geoff McLane ubu...@geoffair.info wrote: IMHO the _MSC_VER and _DEBUG switches do NOT need to be applied. I am forever puzzled how gcc resolves this since the comparison is indeed two pointers ... No it isn't. Both uses in lower_bound and upper_bound take an

Re: [Flightgear-devel] METAR++ or: live wind aloft data for FlightGear

2009-02-21 Thread Vadym Kukhtin
2009/2/19 Torsten Dreyer tors...@t3r.de: Comments welcome. All works fine, thank you very much for this feature. From now long-range flights got new level of realism. -- --- WBR, Vadym. -- Open Source Business

Re: [Flightgear-devel] northern hemisphere vs southern hemisphere

2009-02-21 Thread 黄志勇
BARANGER, It's really funny! :)! Huang. 在2009-02-22,BARANGER Emmanuel embaran...@free.fr 写道: Hi all, After some tests, I just discovered something amusing in FG. In fact, you do not know can be, but the gravity is reversed between the northern hemisphere and southern hemisphere. Finally it is