Tim Moore wrote:
If people really don't like the effects syntax, I might be willing to hold my
nose
and use the existing property implementation. I'm also not committed to
having the
effects properties be of class SGPropertyNode; they might be a subtype.
I have two questions after reading
Heiko Schulz wrote:
Hi,
Well, for someone who don't have any ideas or knowledge about shaders, it
looks really complicated at the first sight. On the other site, it looks a
bit like the .osg-files, and with a bit diggin in, it would be understandable
for me at least.
I guess it is a
* Tim Moore -- Saturday 04 April 2009:
A couple of weeks ago I was asked for a sample of an effects file
that uses my proposed changes to the property system;
And a few weeks later I still object to these property changes, and
will do so as often as it is brought up again. And for all the same
Hi all,
I am having a problem generating scenery with srtm2 data for Australia
the problem is that I can hgtchop the files up ok, but when generating
airports I keep getting error as follows,
genapts --input=/DATA/src/fg/data/Airports/apt.dat.gz --work=./work/
--airport=YSCB 21 |grep -v Next
* Vivian Meazza -- Saturday 04 April 2009:
less-equal?
texture0, texture1. ?
ambientusematerial/ambient/use/ambient ?
I did't even look at that. The vector properties (that have already
been rejected before) were enough for me to reject the whole second
attempt to get this in. But I agree with
Tim Moore
Hello,
A couple of weeks ago I was asked for a sample of an effects file that
uses my
proposed changes to the property system; here it is. The syntax differs
from
current property system syntax in two ways: it uses vector types for some
properties, and some properties can have a
There seemed to be a problem with my mail since I noticed in the
archives there were some replies to my previous post about this item.
I've tweaked the values some more and think I've got it just about right
(or good enough) this time.
Erik
Erik
There seemed to be a problem with my mail since I noticed in the
archives there were some replies to my previous post about this item.
I've tweaked the values some more and think I've got it just about right
(or good enough) this time.
Erik
The ambient light is still too low
* Vivian Meazza -- Saturday 04 April 2009:
I can fix it here, to my entire satisfaction, so if everyone else is
happy, don't worry.
I can't really say much about this, as I'm using a rather old and not
so great monitor that I don't seem to be able to calibrate correctly.
But I agree that the
Hi all,
been a while since I last tried this (about 3 years) and I am
experiancing a few issues.
I have STRM2 data that has been hgtchop'ed ok
into ./work//SRTM2-Australia-3 , but when I run genapt it complains that
the dem data dosn't exist ie
genapts
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Vivian Meazza -- Saturday 04 April 2009:
I can fix it here, to my entire satisfaction, so if everyone else is
happy, don't worry.
I can't really say much about this, as I'm using a rather old and not
so great monitor that I don't seem to be able to calibrate
Hi Jason,
Not sure why you did two posts of the same thing, but...
Maybe it is political? You do know that the 'missing'
DEM information is Capital Hill, Canberra ;=))
Tile e140s40/e149s36/5393832 is centered lat,lon -35.3125,149.125
and in Google Earth that looks like 'Capital Hill' ;=()
Geoff,
sorry for the double post, but I thought I had issues with my old and
new email address.
Anyway,the original hgt source was from
e0srp01u.ecs.nasa.gov/srtm/version2/Australia
This was 'wget' from the site back '06 and unfortunatly not available
now. I am cutting up the hgt file with
Jason Cox wrote:
Geoff,
sorry for the double post, but I thought I had issues with my old and
new email address.
Anyway,the original hgt source was from
e0srp01u.ecs.nasa.gov/srtm/version2/Australia
This was 'wget' from the site back '06 and unfortunatly not available
now. I am
Jon,
Thanks I will setting running again :)
On Sat, 2009-04-04 at 13:11 +0100, Jon Stockill wrote:
Jason Cox wrote:
Geoff,
sorry for the double post, but I thought I had issues with my old and
new email address.
Anyway,the original hgt source was from
On Sat, 2009-04-04 at 13:11 +0100, Jon Stockill wrote:
Jason Cox wrote:
Geoff,
sorry for the double post, but I thought I had issues with my old and
new email address.
Anyway,the original hgt source was from
e0srp01u.ecs.nasa.gov/srtm/version2/Australia
This was 'wget' from the
Geoff,
part of my plan is try and incorporate mif topo's into the mix of
elevation. I had a script somewhere that used Fred's fgsd xml format to
overlay the topo's elevation data on a tile and then export from fgsd to
build a new tile :)
Jason
On Sat, 2009-04-04 at 14:36 +0200, Geoff McLane
Erik
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Vivian Meazza -- Saturday 04 April 2009:
I can fix it here, to my entire satisfaction, so if everyone else is
happy, don't worry.
I can't really say much about this, as I'm using a rather old and not
so great monitor that I don't seem to be able to
* Vivian Meazza -- Saturday 04 April 2009:
This is how I think it should look,
Does indeed look much better here (on my *still* quite bad monitor ;-).
m.
--
___
And a few weeks later I still object to these property changes, and
will do so as often as it is brought up again. And for all the same
reasons!
m.
How would it be better, and would all what Tim wants to do, be still possible?
Vivian Meazza wrote:
I'm doing a small adjustment in light.cxx - seems to work:
float ambient = _ambient_tbl-interpolate( deg ) + (0.25 + 0.75 *
visibility_inv/10);
Not sure that I fancy tinkering around in Data/Lighting/ambient - someone
has obviously taken a lot of care to craft
Hi!
I have got range exception when flying UFO. Looking in sources open that
problem is in ufo.nas line 420:
me.marker = Model.new(Aircraft/ufo/Models/marker.ac,
geo.Coord.new().set_xyz(0, 0, 0));
When passing zeros to geo.Coord.set_xyz(), there is devide by zero in
function
* Heiko Schulz -- Saturday 04 April 2009:
How would it be better, and would all what Tim wants to do,
be still possible?
The features that Tim is talking about (effects and stuff), and
the XML and property tree representation do IMHO not have much
to do with each other.
How can separate
Melchior
* Heiko Schulz -- Saturday 04 April 2009:
How would it be better, and would all what Tim wants to do,
be still possible?
The features that Tim is talking about (effects and stuff), and
the XML and property tree representation do IMHO not have much
to do with each other.
On Saturday 04 April 2009, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Heiko Schulz -- Saturday 04 April 2009:
How would it be better, and would all what Tim wants to do,
be still possible?
The features that Tim is talking about (effects and stuff), and
the XML and property tree representation do IMHO not
Hi!
In GUI style I put one font for and . This give
access violation error. The problem is in FGFontCache destructor.
Class FGFontCache contains two Maps : TexFontMap _texFonts and PuFontMap
_puFonts. _texFonts contains fonts being read from the data/Fonts.
PuFontMap contains fnt structure
Have you tried inverting the Y-axis? ;-)
(Sorry, in the light of the recent prank pulled by YouTube, I couldn't
resist.)
Jason Cox wrote:
Hi all,
I am having a problem generating scenery with srtm2 data for Australia
the problem is that I can hgtchop the files up ok, but when generating
Hi,
This small patch makes water dropped from Gerard's nice PBY Catalina
extinguish wildfires.
http://www.gidenstam.org/FlightGear/misc/WildFire/PBY-Catalina.diff
Cheers,
Anders
--
---
Anders Gidenstam
WWW:
Let me jump in with my thoughts of the day.
Typically in the FlightGear project we have welcomed additive changes (aka
new features.)
We do not seem to be averse to complicated systems, complicated code,
complicated configuration files. Just look at some of the things we can do
with the gui
On Sat, 4 Apr 2009, Tim Moore wrote:
1) Write the full vector every time a component is changed. This means
potentially 4 times the memory traffic to change a color, and leaves the
values stored in OSG in an inconsistent state for a time.
If efficiency is of the outermost concern you could
* Curtis Olson -- Sunday 05 April 2009:
Without seeing anything so far that I would consider a compelling
argument against, I vote for giving Tim the green light here.
Developer convenience has almost always been a good enough reason
in the past.
OK. Unfortunately, this is a route that I
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 3:05 AM, Melchior FRANZ mfr...@aon.at wrote:
* Tim Moore -- Saturday 04 April 2009:
A couple of weeks ago I was asked for a sample of an effects file
that uses my proposed changes to the property system;
And a few weeks later I still object to these property changes,
Taking a break from the serious stuff ... or rather, switching over to the
serious stuff... :-)
This afternoon the winds were almost nothing, so I walked down to a nearby
lake and flew my Seawind EP which is a radio controlled sea plane. The
conditions couldn't have been more perfect and I had
33 matches
Mail list logo
