The problem is gone here with the last posted patch ...
--
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensign option that enables unlimited
royalty-free distribution of the report eng
Hi,
On Tuesday 21 April 2009 02:34:06 gerard robin wrote:
> On mardi 21 avril 2009, syd adams wrote:
> > Im getting the same messages at startup , at any airport I try ,
> > but usually it stops after an exit and restart.
> > I thought it was something local since no one on IRC had the same
> >
Just a note :
I applied the last patch posted here and success !
No more warnings so far ,with the 777-200, at least.
I'll try more.
--
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licens
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 12:29 PM, Alex Romosan wrote:
> syd adams writes:
>
> > I tried this but no luck here Im still getting this message
> > about every second:
> >
> > Warning: invalid line segment passed to
> IntersectVisitor::addLineSegment(..)
> > nan nan 3.87514e+06 nan nan
udpated the patch again, with another Nan killer from jano.
That seems to have worked for him, at least
http://www.bentha.net/fgfs/ridge-lift/Environment.diff.bz2
--
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Che
so here comes another attempt to reduce these error to silence :
line 238 :
if ( alt > 0.1 ) { probe_elev_m[i] = alt; } else { probe_elev_m[i] = 0.1 ;};
lines 319-321 for desperate cases :
strength = lift_mps * SG_METER_TO_FEET ;
if(isnan(strength)) strength=0;
_ridge_lift_fps_node->setDouble
syd adams writes:
> I tried this but no luck here Im still getting this message
> about every second:
>
> Warning: invalid line segment passed to IntersectVisitor::addLineSegment(..)
> nan nan 3.87514e+06 nan nan 3.85687e+06 segment ignored.
i think this depends on the version of o
Hi friends,
just a quick note to tell that I found the bug in OSG that prevent the cursor
to change shape and display the current input mode.
I submitted the fix to Robert, and uploaded a new fg win32 binary with the not
yet official fix at the usual location.
Enjoy ;-)
-Fred
--
Frédéric Bou
I tried this but no luck here Im still getting this message about every
second:
Warning: invalid line segment passed to IntersectVisitor::addLineSegment(..)
nan nan 3.87514e+06 nan nan 3.85687e+06 segment ignored.
> i tested :
> > _ridge_lift_fps_node->setDoubleValue( 0 );
> >
> >
thank you ! I will try another cvs update!
--
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the new simplified licensign option that enables unlimited
royalty-free distribution of the report engine for exter
Am Donnerstag, den 23.04.2009, 17:43 +0200 schrieb jean pellotier:
> Patrice Poly a écrit :
> > the fix, as a patch
> >
> > http://www.bentha.net/fgfs/ridge-lift/Environment.diff.bz2
> >
> > hope this works...
> >
> >
> nope, same behaviour!!
>
> i think that on my "slow" PC, your ridge lift is
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 10:56 -0600, Ron Jensen wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 11:56 -0400, Patrice Poly wrote:
> > > nope, same behaviour!!
> > >
> > > i think that on my "slow" PC, your ridge lift is sometimes initialised a
> > > little to early (while position is 0,0,0 maybe), resulting in some na
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 11:56 -0400, Patrice Poly wrote:
> > nope, same behaviour!!
> >
> > i think that on my "slow" PC, your ridge lift is sometimes initialised a
> > little to early (while position is 0,0,0 maybe), resulting in some nan
> > in the result of terrain scan, wich lead to a "nan" in
>
Hi every one,
I want to use the AIManager to add AIs to FlightGear while
it run. I added a subSystem to receve the modele and the calssing of
the object to load, i used the AIManager Attach methode but i dosn't
work.
SOS.
Vuris.
--
> nope, same behaviour!!
>
> i think that on my "slow" PC, your ridge lift is sometimes initialised a
> little to early (while position is 0,0,0 maybe), resulting in some nan
> in the result of terrain scan, wich lead to a "nan" in
> /environment/ridge-lift-fps.
>
> and as it's used to compute the
Patrice Poly a écrit :
> the fix, as a patch
>
> http://www.bentha.net/fgfs/ridge-lift/Environment.diff.bz2
>
> hope this works...
>
>
nope, same behaviour!!
i think that on my "slow" PC, your ridge lift is sometimes initialised a
little to early (while position is 0,0,0 maybe), resulting in s
> Can you please send a diff to current cvs?
its in the previous post I made. Sorry, I messed up a bit with mail this
morning...
--
Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and
around Java (TM) technolo
> I posted the correct version to
> www.bentha.net/fgfs/ridge-lift/ridge-lift-in-environment.zip
Can you please send a diff to current cvs?
Torsten
--
Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and
around
so, a possible fix :
line 218-220 should be :
probe_lon_rad[i] =
fmod((deg2rad*user_longitude_deg+asin(sin(ground_wind_from_rad)
*sin(dist_probe_m[i]/earth_rad_m)/cos(probe_lat_rad[i]))+PI)
the fix, as a patch
http://www.bentha.net/fgfs/ridge-lift/Environment.diff.bz2
hope this works...
This includes the correction for the lee side, according to Ian's advice based
on real fly.
--
Stay on top of everything
so, a possible fix :
line 218-220 should be :
probe_lon_rad[i] =
fmod((deg2rad*user_longitude_deg+asin(sin(ground_wind_from_rad)
*sin(dist_probe_m[i]/earth_rad_m)/cos(probe_lat_rad[i]))+PI)
gerard robin wrote:
> Yes it is difficult to trap these nan which are coming ( + or -
> randomly ? ? ? , though, getting trouble with carrier) ), and when we get it
> the system is closed to be frozen , with black screen, and command line
> overflowed with messages.
> And when i tried with
On jeudi 23 avril 2009, Martin Spott wrote:
> Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> > I've been seeing this every time I load on Ubuntu Hardy. I'm 90% sure
> > that the ridge-lift enhancement is the root cause - it's the only
> > source change that went in when I rebuilt last.
>
> We've occasionally seen lots o
Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> I've been seeing this every time I load on Ubuntu Hardy. I'm 90% sure
> that the ridge-lift enhancement is the root cause - it's the only
> source change that went in when I rebuilt last.
We've occasionally seen lots of NaN's before addition of the ridge-lift
as well and
Patrice Poly wrote:
>
> I'm a bit at lost for now, as I really don't see any NaN anymore here, and
> don't have another platform to test on.
>
> I would be interested to see on which platforms / configuration this happens,
> maybe when more feedback comes in ??
I've been seeing this every ti
25 matches
Mail list logo
