Yes, I want to compute the error.How can the computations be done??
2009/5/1 Frederic Bouvier
> Maybe Ranjana wants to compute the error between the original HGT and
> the generated scenery ?
> In that case, he has to do the computation himself ( using the btg file
> format and digging into
On mardi 05 mai 2009, Alexis Bory - xiii wrote:
> Alexis Bory wrote:
> > Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Nasal In directory
> > baron.flightgear.org:/tmp/cvs-serv9196
> >
> > Modified Files: pushback.nas Log Message: - Now the pushback "door"
> > will be created only if /sim/model/pushba
Alexis Bory wrote:
> Update of /var/cvs/FlightGear-0.9/data/Nasal In directory
> baron.flightgear.org:/tmp/cvs-serv9196
>
> Modified Files: pushback.nas Log Message: - Now the pushback "door"
> will be created only if /sim/model/pushback has already been created
> by the modeler via the -set.x
* Melchior FRANZ -- Monday 04 May 2009:
> - it uses variable names:
Which would be fine, of course. I meant: *bad* variable names ;-)
m.
--
Register Now & Save for Velocity, the Web Performance & Operations
Conference
* Alexis Bory - xiii -- Monday 04 May 2009:
> But I do not have the piece which is necessary for testing.
I didn't test it either. It's just obviously wrong (and ugly :-).
Wrong, because ...
- it uses aircraft.door before that is guaranteed to exist
- because it doesn't use "var" where it should
Hi guys,
I've sent this code to Alexis, so he could commit it to CVS, without knowing
that
files within the $FG_ROOT/Nasal directory are automaticly loaded with every
aircraft. On my machine the file gave no errors at all. Therefore it's hard for
me
to find what I did wrong supposendly.
Lu
Right, we don't get too bent out of shape if problems and bugs are
discovered in newly committed code, as long as the person responsible is
aggressively pursuing the issues and fixing them as quickly as possible.
(No one is perfect on the first try every time.)
But that said, we really like to kee
Heiko Schulz wrote:
>
>
> May I ask something here? Why there is something comitted, which
> isn't tested yet?
But commiting to the CVS is the faster way to get usefull feed back and
gather differents opinions on a proposal.
> A generic pushback sounds nice, but so much as I
> understood, the
May I ask something here?
Why there is something comitted, which isn't tested yet? A generic pushback
sounds nice, but so much as I understood, the feature is only for JSBSim and
all the JSBsim aircafts who wants to use this feature, needs an update. At
least there should be one aircraft exam
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> * Alexis Bory -- Monday 04 May 2009:
> > Added Files: pushback.nas
>
> This is not only verbose and ugly code, it will cause error messages
> and not work on some machines. Just saying ...
>
> m. :-}
Hi Melchior,
I did not had such a strong feeling when receiving Gijs
* Alexis Bory -- Monday 04 May 2009:
> Added Files:
> pushback.nas
This is not only verbose and ugly code, it will cause error
messages and not work on some machines. Just saying ...
m. :-}
--
Register Now & Sav
11 matches
Mail list logo
