>> I'm not aware of such data "within the FlightGear project", but I
>> think
>> "project magenta" has some in their navdata download section yet
>> I have no clue about their license and the scope of their collection.
>
> If there's some available under a compatible license, I would love
> s
Hi,
here are SID/STAR data from the XPlane Goodway Flightplanner. They are a
bit outdated, I don't know if other data are available (other related
project?). I'm used to use them in my flightplan script, and asked some
years ago to the Goodway team to use them within FG, they were fine with
th
On 10 Jun 2009, at 20:55, Torsten Dreyer wrote:
> The ridge_lift is now also using the SGGeodesy methods, making the
> code much
> cleaner, too.
A word of caution - looking at the code, it seems like you're mixing
geocentric (SGGeoc) and geodetic (SGGeod) co-ordinates. I haven't
looked at
On 10 Jun 2009, at 21:29, Martin Spott wrote:
> I'm not aware of such data "within the FlightGear project", but I
> think
> "project magenta" has some in their navdata download section yet
> I have no clue about their license and the scope of their collection.
If there's some available u
Curtis Olson wrote:
> Question: do we have SID/STAR data available anywhere within the FlightGear
> project?
I'm not aware of such data "within the FlightGear project", but I think
"project magenta" has some in their navdata download section yet
I have no clue about their license and the sc
Hi James,
James Turner wrote:
> Update of /var/cvs/SimGear-0.3/source/simgear/route
> In directory baron.flightgear.org:/tmp/cvs-serv5559/simgear/route
>
> Modified Files:
>route.cxx route.hxx waypoint.cxx waypoint.hxx
> Log Message:
> Extend SGWaypoint with track and speed data, and co
Question: do we have SID/STAR data available anywhere within the FlightGear
project?
Thanks,
Curt.
--
Curtis Olson: http://baron.flightgear.org/~curt/
--
Crystal Reports - New Free Runtime and 30 Day Trial
Check out the
> Along the way I've converted a few more objects to store positions as
> SGGeod instead of raw doubles - notably FGViewer and the ground
> network nodes. In the FGViewer case this made the code considerably
> simpler,
The ridge_lift is now also using the SGGeodesy methods, making the code much
cl
Hi All,
Is there any work being done to fix the lack of 'Emission Animation'?
Currently, to test any animated models which use "/sim/time/utc/
second", I have to resort to version 1.0.0.
In view of the way things are being changed as FG progresses, it would
be a shame if this previously avai
9 matches
Mail list logo