Re: [Flightgear-devel] Official

2010-06-22 Thread Nathanael Rebsch
i once took care of sorting out the legal situation of OpenTTD. OpenTTD was reverse engeneered from Transport Tycoon (Deluxe, IIRC). This work was done in Sweden, where now law prohibited the reverse engeneering if lisence agreements (e.g. eula) did not take care of such notices - on this very

Re: [Flightgear-devel] ATC

2010-06-22 Thread Martin Spott
Peter Morgan wrote: although there are a few atc client around such as 1) ATC 2) ATC2 3) ATCML - fav I don't know any of these. so is there a way to create an ATC client without FG ? Depends on what you're looking for - ATC client is a very vague description. There's something like a

Re: [Flightgear-devel] ATC

2010-06-22 Thread Alexander Barrett
Thanks for that Martin, I'd never seen OpenRadar before. Been dabbling in Java recently (the lazy mans attempt at CrossPlatform ;) ) might be something to have a tinker with! Thanks again. Alex On 22 Jun 2010, at 09:36, Martin Spott wrote: Peter Morgan wrote: although there are a few

Re: [Flightgear-devel] ATC

2010-06-22 Thread Scott Hamilton
I've been tinkering around with a JEE ATC support web app concept, the idea is to support ATC controllers using one of the ATC aircraft or perhaps the OpenRadar app, by having a central place to file flight plans (virtual airline websites could post data through a REST or XML/HTTP interface

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Ask willie

2010-06-22 Thread willie
Don't bother asking Willie on this. Willie is quite happy with the New Features forum for now. I haven't posted there yet but intend to be punting GSoC quite heavily there soon. Just how I go about this will be influenced by replies I get from another ongoing thread in flightgear-devel. This

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Official

2010-06-22 Thread Reagan Thomas
Nathanael Rebsch wrote: i once took care of sorting out the legal situation of OpenTTD. OpenTTD was reverse engeneered from Transport Tycoon (Deluxe, IIRC). This work was done in Sweden, where now law prohibited the reverse engeneering if lisence agreements (e.g. eula) did not take care of

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Official

2010-06-22 Thread Alexander Barrett
Things have certainly changed. Back in 1995 I was helping to run a Virtual American Airlines and after 4 or so months of operating actively (FS95 it was!) we got a letter stating we had to shut down immediately or start paying licensing costs, which were thousands per day if I recall

[Flightgear-devel] dumb git question

2010-06-22 Thread Curtis Olson
Here's a dumb git question. Previously with cvs or svn, if I inadvertently removed a file, or screwed up a file really badly and just wanted to start clean with the repository version, I could just remove the file and run cvs/svn update and the missing file would be noticed, and the system would

Re: [Flightgear-devel] dumb git question

2010-06-22 Thread Oliver Thurau
I figured to not delete the file and use the revert option. (using tortoisegit on win7) Not sure if there is a better way to do this. Cheers, Oliver _ Von: Curtis Olson [mailto:curtol...@gmail.com] Gesendet: Dienstag, 22. Juni 2010 22:21 An: FlightGear developers discussions Betreff:

Re: [Flightgear-devel] dumb git question

2010-06-22 Thread Anders Gidenstam
On Tue, 22 Jun 2010, Curtis Olson wrote: Here's a dumb git question. Previously with cvs or svn, if I inadvertently removed a file, or screwed up a file really badly and just wanted to start clean with the repository version, I could just remove the file and run cvs/svn update and the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] dumb git question

2010-06-22 Thread Roy Vegard Ovesen
On Tue, 2010-06-22 at 15:20 -0500, Curtis Olson wrote: Here's a dumb git question. Previously with cvs or svn, if I inadvertently removed a file, or screwed up a file really badly and just wanted to start clean with the repository version, I could just remove the file and run cvs/svn

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 2d clouds

2010-06-22 Thread syd adams
Thanks for the links , I'll do some reading tonight . I was just a surprised because I hadn't seen it mentioned on the dev-list . Or I just missed that one maybe :) Cheers On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 5:01 AM, thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi wrote: Glad to know it's just not me. I wonder if it has anything

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Official

2010-06-22 Thread Nathanael Rebsch
Reagan Thomas wrote: Nathanael Rebsch wrote: i once took care of sorting out the legal situation of OpenTTD. OpenTTD was reverse engeneered from Transport Tycoon (Deluxe, IIRC). This work was done in Sweden, where now law prohibited the reverse engeneering if lisence agreements (e.g.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] dumb git question

2010-06-22 Thread Andy Ross
Thought I'd chime in here, as I've been going through the git transition pains myself recently, and the other answers have been all about the what and not the why of the task. Git adds an extra level of indirection that you're not used to: the cvs/svn model of the world had only one repository.