Csaba Halász wrote:
> You missed this email:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg29756.html
> about "Scenemodels/MapServer.flightgear.org, planned outage"
Yup. The new machine is already alive (the web map should be available)
but I'm still awaiting a chance to
On 2010-12-02 15.07, Csaba Halász wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 2:58 PM, Jari Häkkinen wrote:
>> I am trying to update fg data with 'git pull' but keep getting
>> connection refused:
>>
>> Can someone resolve the issue on mapserver or explain what I am doing
>> wrong if the problem is on my side
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 2:58 PM, Jari Häkkinen wrote:
> I am trying to update fg data with 'git pull' but keep getting
> connection refused:
>
> Can someone resolve the issue on mapserver or explain what I am doing
> wrong if the problem is on my side.
You missed this email:
http://www.mail-archiv
I am trying to update fg data with 'git pull' but keep getting
connection refused:
mapserver.flightgear.org[0: 137.110.116.31]: errno=Connection refused
fatal: unable to connect a socket (Connection refused)
In my .git/config I have
url = git://mapserver.flightgear.org/fgdata/
Can someone
Le jeudi 02 décembre 2010 09:45:04, thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi a écrit :
> Henri wrote:
> > Please don't fall in the MSFS policy, when the eye candy is the
main
> > approach.
>
> I don't see 'accuracy' and 'visual detail' as mutually exclusive -
you can
> have both. I for once am interested in 'real
> My point is your rating was based on an assumption that was totally
> incorrect: that the developer had made a reasonable effort to put the
> right
> gauges and levers in the right place. Do you make a similar assumption
> about
> the FDM? That it is approximately right? Is there much value in su
Thorsten
... snip ...
> Vivian wrote:
>
> > If I might interject here, I would draw your attention to the KC135.
>
> I looked it up and it got a 3 - seems to be reasonable, even given your
> description (it shouldn't get zero because it actually flies - it
> shouldn't get 1 because it has usuab
Henri wrote:
> Please don't fall in the MSFS policy, when the eye candy is the main
> approach.
I don't see 'accuracy' and 'visual detail' as mutually exclusive - you can
have both. I for once am interested in 'realism' in a simulator. An
important part is that the aircraft behaves like an aircr
Can you move up the stack into SGText::UpdateCallback::operator() and see
what is being passed to createUTF8EncodedString?
Thanks,
Tim
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 8:46 AM, Jeff Taylor wrote:
> On 29/11/10 12:45 AM, Erik Hofman wrote:
> > So it looks like to be a JSBSim problem, now you could try to
9 matches
Mail list logo
