Syd wrote
But definitely: The designer should take the risk for it - and if too
young: The parents should support it - that is standard in any legal
business matter for youngsters!
I agree here ... being mainly a 'content creator' , I think I'm
responsible for content I create , and
On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 09:23 +0100, Erik Hofman wrote:
On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 08:51 +0100, Erik Hofman wrote:
On Thu, 2011-03-03 at 13:51 -0500, Peter Brown wrote:
http://www.mediafire.com/file/zo967hk164bjkzq/OV10%2020110303.zip
The files are set to private so I'm unable to retrieve
Hi all,
I have a long standing issue with my installation of FlightGear. Here is
how it's set up:
* git cloned sources under /home (i.e. /home/{simgear,flightgear,fgdata})
* compilation of simgear and flightgear from the sources
cd /home/{simgear,flightgear}
git pull
I don't know if it's a bug or it's me (I think it's a bug), so I ask you for
comments about that.
I'm fooling around with an Arduino board that sends data to FGFS with a serial
protocol: fgfs
--generic=serial,in,30,/dev/ttyACM1,9600,arduino_serial_basic_input
The protocol input sections is
On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 12:21 +, Vivian Meazza wrote:
1. Is there a difference between a trademark and a copyright?
A. There is a very great difference, at least in the UK.
I'm glad you recognize that because, in your first quiz you focused
strictly on copyright and didn't mention
On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 19:31 +0100, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..in some jurisdictions, trade marks need merely be established, to
become enforceable. In others, established trade marks needs to be
registered before they become enforceable. Can of worms indeed.
All the more reason for the FG
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 3:58 PM, Chris O'Neill chrison...@yahoo.ca wrote:
Wait a minute! If we're going to look the other way and breach
someone else's trademark rights, then why would we get snotty with
someone who breaches our copyright? It seems a bit hypocritical to me.
I don't know, I
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 7:58 AM, Chris O'Neill chrison...@yahoo.ca wrote:
the livery. If Mack Jermod (or anyone else for that matter) wants a Red
Bull (or any other trademark) on their livery, then so be it but let
Mack Jermod (and the others) distribute it themselves and assume any and
all
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Roberto Inzerillo rob...@gmx.net wrote:
Is it FlightGear not parsing correctly the string input? Maybe attaching to
it any \n it receives as a part of the string?
Yes. That code could use some cleanup.
First, it calls the simgear io channel function readline()
On Sat, 5 Mar 2011 15:09:08 +0100, Guy wrote in message
20110305140908.ga2...@unistra.fr:
Hi all,
I have a long standing issue with my installation of FlightGear. Here
is how it's set up:
* git cloned sources under /home
(i.e. /home/{simgear,flightgear,fgdata})
..that means you
On Sat, 05 Mar 2011 15:58:18 -0500, Chris wrote in message
1299358698.2186.105.camel@Chris-Laptop:
On Fri, 2011-03-04 at 12:21 +, Vivian Meazza wrote:
So we would have to ask our users to
...not...?
add dodgy liveries to our AI aircraft?
I don't accept that having an aircraft
On Tue, 1 Mar 2011 22:03:02 + (UTC), Martin wrote in message
ikjqem$s86a$1...@osprey.mgras.de:
Oliver Fels wrote:
What I can imagine as a solution: FlightGear does not include the
liveries in the distribution but provides further web space for
separately downloading those.
This
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 1:23 AM, Csaba Halász csaba.hal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 6:09 PM, Roberto Inzerillo rob...@gmx.net wrote:
Is it FlightGear not parsing correctly the string input? Maybe attaching to
it any \n it receives as a part of the string?
Yes. That code could
13 matches
Mail list logo