On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 15:24 +0200, grth_team wrote:
FG 2.4 consistency.
Hello,
You don't know us since we are newbee, (3 months working seriously
with FG).
We are a team ( 4 guys and a lady ).
We have had several talks with several devel team persons about a
Catalina model update.
You mentioned earlier that a lot of the performance issues would
disappear
if we could probe the terrain 100 times faster. I've been thinking about
this for a while for ai traffic, skyop's moving map instrument, and
weather.
I'm thinking of storing some resolution of altitude data in the
Erik wrote
On Wed, 2011-07-13 at 15:24 +0200, grth_team wrote:
FG 2.4 consistency.
Hello,
You don't know us since we are newbee, (3 months working seriously
with FG).
We are a team ( 4 guys and a lady ).
We have had several talks with several devel team persons about a
If I may be permitted some personal comments about things which bug me?
I've been thinking quite a bit (possibly more than it's good for me)
triggered by responses on the list during the last days, and I would
perhaps take the time to clarify my position on a few things.
I get the impression
-Original Message-
From: thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi [mailto:thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi]
Sent: 14 July 2011 12:46
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: [Flightgear-devel] Current Weather System...
If I may be permitted some personal comments about things which bug me?
I've
On 14 Jul 2011, at 12:46, thorsten.i.r...@jyu.fi wrote:
Nasal has a garbage collection problem. One solution to it is - we avoid
Nasal code wherever possible and try to hard-code everything. But Nasal
crops up on a lot of places - complex aircraft such as the Concorde come
to my mind,
Okay, it isn't plain text (we can easily convert it once it's done, altough I
cannot think of a place where we'd publish
a plain-text-changelog, apparently we stopped updating the fgdata/NEWS file),
but this will allow us to work together
on a nice release announcement/changelog, so nothing
Hi Thorsten,
Thanks for writing. I've got a couple of comments.
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:46 PM, Thorsten Renk wrote:
I get the impression that some people believe that Local Weather is a
temporary, experimental thing. That's actually not my position. I assigned
a version number larger
Hi there,
My partner (works for Virgin Australia) got an email of photos of new liveries
for this low-cost South African carrier, here is a link to some...
http://www.iloveplanes.com/aviation-news/commercial/special-sxswi-edition-saturday-wings-kulula/
Brilliant! Well worthy of an addition
Simple: Keep the options in the dialog simple, but add a advanced
button, so everyone will be happy with the dialog! :D
--
AppSumo Presents a FREE Video for the SourceForge Community by Eric
Ries, the creator of the
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 10:22 PM, Gijs de Rooy wrote:
Okay, it isn't plain text (we can easily convert it once it's done, altough
I cannot think of a place where we'd publish
a plain-text-changelog, apparently we stopped updating the fgdata/NEWS
file), but this will allow us to work together
Dear forum,
Could someone tell me how to CALL into action another AI scenario
for example see below!
AI Scenario_1 runs, at some point during the scenario CALL to AI Scenario_2 ;
to RUN (similar to a batch file CALL)
Is this possible?
I need to be able to run several scenarios
I think the one reason for this view is the level of integration with the FG
core, where you've had to work hard to override the global weather system
through no fault of your own. I think with better integration, the
local weather
package will feel much more part of the whole.
I moved many
13 matches
Mail list logo
