Flightgear-commitlogs wrote:
The branch, master has been updated
- Log -
commit 01cd74bef43ff957270c4d56743b284f23a32732
Author: Blackiris
Date: Wed Jun 6 10:29:37 2012 +0200
Add footer and other HTML stuff
Could
Oh, it's me...
Have I done something wrong ? (I don't know with this nickname was used
by the way)
Le 07/06/2012 13:14, Martin Spott a écrit :
Flightgear-commitlogs wrote:
The branch, master has been updated
- Log -
commit
You'll find his name on gitorious ;-)
http://gitorious.org/fg/sceneryweb/commit/01cd74bef43ff957270c4d56743b284f23a32732
To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
From: martin.sp...@mgras.net
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2012 11:14:21 +
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-commitlogs]
On Sat, Jun 2, 2012 at 8:36 PM, Torsten Dreyer wrote:
Two questions have to be discussed and answered until the release
branches get created on July, 17th:
1) What's the version number of the new release?
a) 2.8.0
b) 3.0.0
Given the introduction of Rembrandt, I'd suggest 3.0.0. It's
a
Personally I'd leave 3.0 for the new apt 850 support. If that's not in for
summer leave it at 2.8.
--- On Thu, 6/7/12, Stuart Buchanan stuar...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Stuart Buchanan stuar...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] The next FlightGear release (summer 2012)
To:
If the new autogen will be included, I'm also in favor for a 3.0.0
version numbering.
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Michael wrote:
Personally I'd leave 3.0 for the new apt 850 support. If that's not in for
summer leave it at 2.8.
I think we need a new world scenery generation to take place to take
full advantage of apt 850 support. I don't know if that's on the
cards for
Firefox did 2.0 - 13.0 between 2011 and 2012...
;-)
not saying this is the way to go for the years to come, but the enhancements
seen since the start of 2.0, are, I think, worth a good, stable 3.0.
Major numbering do attract more people, too.
Good to know.
I'd dedicate some CPU time to world scenery generation, but I'm not
sure how many months that would take... :S
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's
Julien Nguyen wrote:
Oh, it's me...
Have I done something wrong ? (I don't know with this nickname was used by
the way)
I think the key is to understand the particular difference between the
GIT repository and the Gitorious web site.
Apparently Gitorious somehow manages to translate the
Hello,
Two questions have to be discussed and answered until the release
branches get created on July, 17th:
1) What's the version number of the new release?
a) 2.8.0
b) 3.0.0
Keep it consistent: 2.8.0
My reasons:
-Rembrandt is still experimental and Fred's To-Do-list is still big. I
As I mentioned some weeks ago I think we should leave path of creating world
scenery in one task. I made a proposal how to create world scenery in chunks
all day and nights with jenkins on different machines for different regions.
The sources for this creation process can remain on one master,
Hi all!
Calling something a major release is not just a matter of what's possible,
but also what's done.
There's a lot possible with Rembrandt, but 99% of our aircraft don't use it.
And lots of aircraft look ugly with Rembrandt
(non-translucent windows and fake shadows mostly). I just
Thorsten,
Heiko and Vivian, please try the following version and let me know if this
improves anything. If possible, do all tests with the weather tile type
'Test'
(that has no randomness in the cloud configuration selection, so it
delivers a
fairly reproducable situation in terms of cloud
Just to add a note what is already running on this jenkins right now, on
different slaves:
- hgtchop available SRTM-3 data (I make use of the no data filled files I
provide), this a one day job on very old machine
- terrafitting the data (another one day job on the same old machine)
- taking
Le 07/06/2012 18:04, Gijs de Rooy a écrit :
There's a lot possible with Rembrandt, but 99% of our aircraft don't
use it. And lots of aircraft look ugly with Rembrandt
(non-translucent windows and fake shadows mostly). I just checked the
few aircraft that I remember being included in the base
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 5:04 PM, Gijs de Rooy wrote:
Hi all!
Calling something a major release is not just a matter of what's possible,
but also what's done.
There's a lot possible with Rembrandt, but 99% of our aircraft don't use it.
And lots of aircraft look ugly with Rembrandt
Stuart Buchanan wrote:
I'm not sure that is correct, but my memory is dim. My recollection was that
even after we converted the main cvs branch to OSG, we kept a plib branch
that was used for a subsequent release.
There's a key difference: The OSG port, at least when it was added to
CVS, was
On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 10:44 PM, Martin Spott wrote:
Stuart Buchanan wrote:
I'm not sure that is correct, but my memory is dim. My recollection was that
even after we converted the main cvs branch to OSG, we kept a plib branch
that was used for a subsequent release.
I was wrong - 1.9.0 was
Stuart Buchanan wrote:
So you would prefer not to mention it in the change log and release
note?
In order to save everybody from pointless discussion, I won't disclose
my preference. Anyhow I'd vote for seriously taking into account,
that, for a large fraction of FlightGear's user base,
Rembrandt has been around for quite a few months now,
and the changes required to make an aircraft Rembrandt-compatible are
pretty small, even if the changes to add proper lights are more involved.
If I was being harsh I'd suggest that the aircraft maintainers should
man up and do it.
I changed my git username with this command line:
git config --global user.name My name
Sorry for the noise.
Cheers,
Julien Nguyen
Le 07/06/2012 16:49, Martin Spott a écrit :
Julien Nguyen wrote:
Oh, it's me...
Have I done something wrong ? (I don't know with this nickname was used
Yes, bring it on for those already wanting 850. Hence I could already work on
swiss 850 airports, to have it ready without any hassle for 2.9 Terrasync
integration.
Could you let me know as soon as Europe/Switzerland could be used? Maybe as
early/parallel 2.9 git, download or whatever.
Thanks
23 matches
Mail list logo
