Just a heads-up. (MSVC10)
Alan
3 mathlib.c
3C:\FlightGear\simgear\simgear\nasal\mathlib.c(130): error C2143: syntax
error : missing ';' before 'type'
3C:\FlightGear\simgear\simgear\nasal\mathlib.c(131): error C2065: 'range' :
undeclared identifier
Not sure this is a jbsim problem, but:
Start Flightgear using fgrun at ksfo with c172P
fly. normal flight.
Exit Flightgear
restart flightgear using fgrun
Change airport to Lansing Muni
try to fly. Plane behaves badly. My yoke does the opposite of usual
I push in and nose raises, pull out
De: Alan Teeder
Just a heads-up. (MSVC10)
Alan
3 mathlib.c
3C:\FlightGear\simgear\simgear\nasal\mathlib.c(130): error C2143:
syntax error : missing ';' before 'type'
3C:\FlightGear\simgear\simgear\nasal\mathlib.c(131): error C2065:
'range' : undeclared identifier
I think that we all know that, but unfortunately it is something that we
have to live with - FG is multiplatform.
Sorry - but please don´t blame the messenger. ;-(
Alan
-Original Message-
From: Frederic Bouvier
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 10:45 AM
To: FlightGear developers
On Wednesday 23 January 2013 13:48:44 Alan Teeder wrote:
I think that we all know that, but unfortunately it is something that we
have to live with - FG is multiplatform.
Sorry - but please don´t blame the messenger. ;-(
Wouldn't it be possible to compile this file in C++ mode? That's the
I think that we all know that
Not sure as we can see it.
Sorry - but please don´t blame the messenger. ;-(
I agree we should live with that, and my intent wasn't to blame the messenger,
only the careless committer ;)
-Fred
- Mail original -
De: Alan Teeder ajtee...@v-twin.org.uk
I
On 23 Jan 2013, at 11:45, Frederic Bouvier fredfgf...@free.fr wrote:
Reminder to all : MSVC is not C99 Compliant. It doesn't like C++ style
variable declaration inside the body of a bloc
I've pushed a fixed now, I would have fixed sooner but all the Windows slaves
on Jenkins are doing
The real problem is with the (lack off) standards compliance, and we all
have views in that.
(I trust that we are all too adult not to have a Windows/Gnu/Linux flame war
on this forum. Leave that to other places. )
Alan
-Original Message-
From: Frederic Bouvier
Sent: Wednesday,
From: James Turner
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2013 3:03 PM
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Simgear windows compile -
mathlib.c/test_state_machine
On 23 Jan 2013, at 11:45, Frederic Bouvier fredfgf...@free.fr wrote:
Reminder to all : MSVC is not
On 01/23/2013 04:08 PM, Alan Teeder wrote:
(I trust that we are all too adult not to have a Windows/Gnu/Linux flame war
on this forum. Leave that to other places. )
I can't remember the time this has happened, so no need to worry.
Erik
--
http://www.adalin.com - Hardware accelerated AeonWave
Hi James,
De: James Turner zakal...@mac.com
On 23 Jan 2013, at 11:45, Frederic Bouvier fredfgf...@free.fr
wrote:
Reminder to all : MSVC is not C99 Compliant. It doesn't like C++
style
variable declaration inside the body of a bloc
I've pushed a fixed now, I would have fixed
On Sunday, January 20, 2013 19:17:18 Renk Thorsten wrote:
Well, if you ask in that way, then the question is:
Do we need 10 different flavours of rock?
If we want to look a scene roughly as it would in the location, the answer
is yes - volcanic rock on Hawaii looks very different from
Hi Mathias,
Stepping in here just in case some context is getting lost in
translation :).
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 8:50 PM, Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
What I really do not like is that people purely push in the direction they
just like more. If you work sensibly, you can support both. If you want
I see applications that care for stable 60 hz. If you get for one frame
59 hz they have too much jitter and look for an other renderer.
What I really do not like is that people purely push in the direction
they just like more.
Beats me when this has ever been a problem. My first
14 matches
Mail list logo
