Hi Tom,
sorry if I sound overly pessimistic, but... several of the potential issues are
structurally not that different from problems I've encountered in painting
terrain or setting up credible weather. it doesn't mean that I am in any way
against your plan, but I want to see if you have any
Just to check, will both Flightgear and Simgear be updated to 2.10.1,
or just Flightgear?
Saikrishna Arcot
On Wed 13 Mar 2013 08:31:40 AM CDT, James Turner wrote:
Hi,
As previously suggested, I am going to attempt a 2.10.1 release, to see if
this improves our perceived quality. There's
Hi James, sounds good, even if there are only a small number (1 or more)
important fixes. Would it make sense to amend our release procedure
(Torsten) :-) to include a subsection on sub-release procedures. Under the
hood we probably repeat most of the full release procedure, but maybe we'd
want
So far I can think of two fixes:
0b04458e99689a30f668d1b37bce93fa55149a2b
b71e703d75d19dff698b38177f319c6baa76a277
Will let you know when I find more.
Gijs --
Everyone hates slow
On 13 Mar 2013, at 13:51, Gijs de Rooy gijsr...@hotmail.com wrote:
0b04458e99689a30f668d1b37bce93fa55149a2b
b71e703d75d19dff698b38177f319c6baa76a277
You know, saying which repository, and a one line description of the fix, would
really save me some typing and git calls :)
James
On 13 Mar 2013, at 13:35, Saikrishna Arcot saiarcot...@gmail.com wrote:
Just to check, will both Flightgear and Simgear be updated to 2.10.1,
or just Flightgear?
All three - simgear, flightgear and fgdata - since the fixes span all three.
James
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Torsten Dreyer tors...@t3r.de wrote:
Yes, it's very interesting. My chart for Ireland specifically warns
about the large variation (+5W) which I'm sure catches people out. And
that's before you have to add variation due to the airframe !
nitpicking
which
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 9:31 AM, James Turner zakal...@mac.com wrote:
Hi,
As previously suggested, I am going to attempt a 2.10.1 release, to see if
this improves our perceived quality. There's some bug fixes I am already
aware of, including a Windows path-handling one which is quite
On 13/03/13 15:37, Curtis Olson wrote:
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 10:20 AM, Torsten Dreyer tors...@t3r.de
mailto:tors...@t3r.de wrote:
Yes, it's very interesting. My chart for Ireland specifically warns
about the large variation (+5W) which I'm sure catches people
out. And
Hi,
- Mail original -
De: Gary Neely grne...@gmail.com
On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 9:31 AM, James Turner zakal...@mac.com
wrote:
Hi,
As previously suggested, I am going to attempt a 2.10.1 release, to
see if this improves our perceived quality. There's some bug fixes
I am
With regard to the Windows release, after installing Setup
Flightgear
2.10.0.3.exe on Windows XP, when launching fgrun I immediately get
the following error/warning:
There is no disk in the drive. Please insert a disk into drive
D:.
It does it upon launch of fgrun, and it will
I have a suggestion/proposal for the compression method of the fgdata
package: Instead of using tar.bz2, we can use tar.xz (XZ is based on
LZMA) to get a lower compression ratio. Based on comparisons done by
other people, here are the effects:
+ Less time for decompression compared to bzip2.
+
12 matches
Mail list logo