Hi,
..looks like I was caught in the middle of something:
[ 97%] Building CXX object
utils/fgai/CMakeFiles/fgai.dir/HLAAircraftClass.cxx.o
/home/arnt/FG-git/fgfs/flightgear/utils/fgai/fgai.cxx:
In function ‘int main(int, char**)’:
/home/arnt/FG-git/fgfs/flightgear/utils/fgai/fgai.cxx
clared in this scope
make[2]: *** [src/Main/CMakeFiles/fgfs.dir/__/FDM/SP/ADA.cxx.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [src/Main/CMakeFiles/fgfs.dir/all] Error 2
make: *** [all] Error 2
$
I then tried without SP_FDMS and the compilation fails at 98%, output follows:
[ 98%] Built target fgpanel
[ 98%] Building C
make: *** [all] Error
> 2 $
..exactly how did you try to do this compile?
>
> I then tried without SP_FDMS and the compilation fails at 98%, output
> follows:
>
>
> [ 98%] Built target fgpanel
> [ 98%] Building CXX object utils/fgai/CMakeFiles/fgai.dir/fgai.cxx.o
> /h
vement in
> memory usage and view distance.
Ok, for that, I can see a lot of solutions.
Having one that is may be close:
Use the BVH tree that is used in fgelev or fgai. The fgelev one is
parametrized like you probably need today. There is one hacky switch in the
BVH paging that only loads te
On 9 Feb 2013, at 11:16, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> ..I too get this. If you need FG right now for e.g. PPL training,
If you are using FlightGear for anything serious, you should't be doing so
using 'next' which is unstable and may have temporarily broken features.
The fga
for anything serious, you should't be
> doing so using 'next' which is unstable and may have temporarily
> broken features.
>
> The fgai issue, I believe Mathias has pushed a fix for,
..yup, that compiles ok now.
> I'll take a look at the other failure
gt;>> ..I too get this. If you need FG right now for e.g. PPL
>>> training,
>>
>> If you are using FlightGear for anything serious, you should't
>> be doing so using 'next' which is unstable and may have
>> temporarily broken features.
>&
On Sunday, December 16, 2012 23:11:44 Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
Hi Mathias,
> Ok, for that, I can see a lot of solutions.
>
> Having one that is may be close:
> Use the BVH tree that is used in fgelev or fgai. The fgelev one is
> parametrized like you probably need today. The
e last stable version, "-a n -p n" keeps Debian and
> Ubuntu .deb packages away from your Gentoo box.
> James wrote:
> If you are using FlightGear for anything serious, you should't be doing so
> using 'next' which is unstable and may have temporarily broken
hla-local=rti://localhost/FlightGear is a shortcut for a
longer --hla= line.
Steps are currently to clean out my disk and provide what is there.
What will come in the shorter term is a standalone viewer that can sit on any
of the configured views. There are beginnings of that checked in but the
ng FlightGear for anything serious, you should't
> >> be doing so using 'next' which is unstable and may have
> >> temporarily broken features.
> >>
> >> The fgai issue, I believe Mathias has pushed a fix for,
> >
> > ..yup, that compil
HLA server ? Can you explain a litttle bit how it works at architecture level ?
(Is it a centralized server routing every packet between user ? similar to FGMS
network ?)
3)
I've worked on a project called "FGAIS" who is certainly related to your recent
"fgai" tools.
12 matches
Mail list logo
