Csaba Halász
Sent: 14 June 2007 04:28
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] C++ code beautifier / Coding
On 6/14/07, Martin Spott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vivian Meazza wrote:
Lesson for the future. Understand what code does, test that it
doesn't break anything, make sure
Durk
Sent: 14 June 2007 06:57
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] tacan.cxx fix to follow AITanker.cxx
On Wednesday 13 June 2007 23:12, alexis bory wrote:
Hi,
TACAN has to search the new AI submode 'tanker'.
This tiny patch can be applied to
Durk
Sent: 14 June 2007 12:57
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] tacan.cxx fix to follow AITanker.cxx
Hi Vivian,
On Thursday 14 June 2007 13:39, Vivian Meazza wrote:
Durk
Sent: 14 June 2007 06:57
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Hi,
Tim Moore has been hard at work recently (with the smallest of inputs by
me), and has ported the improved weather radar already available for plib to
OSG.
The patches are here:
ftp://abbeytheatre2.org.uk/fgfs/instrumentation/osg/
And a reminder of the improvements available: raw radar
Durk wrote
Sent: 13 June 2007 19:25
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] C++ code beautifier / Coding
standardsproposal
On Saturday 09 June 2007 17:07, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Durk Talsma -- Saturday 09 June 2007:
I've attached the configuration
AJ wrote
Sent: 06 June 2007 12:58
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] AI Demo vs. AITraffic at KSFO
On Wednesday 06 June 2007 06:49, Durk Talsma wrote:
Keeping the upcoming release in mind, Innis Cunningham just
attended
me to the fact that the AI
Martin Spott wrote
Sent: 04 June 2007 23:07
To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flying at/for LinuxTag
Matthias Boerner wrote:
I myself was only responsible for organizing ( as
installing,...) the
SUN workstations and the monitors.
Hi,
Just a reminder that an improved weather radar is available at:
ftp://abbeytheatre2.org.uk/fgfs/instrumentation/
In addition to the existing weather radar functions, this improved
instrument uses the Radar Equation to display raw radar contacts, corrected
for RCS and the radar horizon, as
Maik Justus wrote
Sent: 19 May 2007 10:34
if you look into the forum or read the IRC and even the mailing list,
you get aware, that many new users are not able to start the
multiplayer
option, due to a missing --enable-ai-models option. And probably much
more potential players fail at
Martin Spott
Sent: 17 May 2007 15:33
gh.robin wrote:
With FlightGear-0.9.11-pre1 it is something strange
we have Flying Carriers.
The carrier is correct - sea level is wrong :-))
Martin.
P.S.: Just a joke
No - correct, or nearly so
Vivian
It's not a bug it's a feature! The carrier operates in the same frame of
reference as aircraft - it has to otherwise you couldn't catch wires
correctly. Unfortunately, the sea surface does not - elsewhere on the sea
surface you will see the carrier up to the sponsons in water. If you don't
crash
syd sandy
Sent: 16 May 2007 00:52
On Tue, 15 May 2007 20:46:57 +0200
Maik Justus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I think the dhc2f should be added as an example for float-planes.
Maik
I'd have to vote against the dhc2F for now because the PLIB
submodel animation is broken ,
Hi,
This morning's update of fg-cvs fails to compile under MSVC8 with the
following error:
error C2491: 'terminate' : definition of dllimport function not allowed
Flightgear-cvs\source\src\Main\bootstrap.cxx147
The attached patch fixes it (but it may not be the best way of doing it).
Harald
Sent: 13 May 2007 18:19
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] More ideas on dogfighting
Ampere K. Hardraade wrote:
On Sunday 13 May 2007 03:52, Harald JOHNSEN wrote:
Now if the server is doing the
FDM computation it's obvious that there is
Holger Wirtz wrote
after reading this thread I also want to drop some words:
First I thaught dogfight would be nice. Ok, there will ever
be cheaters and people who cannot differentiate between
simple fun playing and the real world. But I think this is
not the problem of FlightGear.
The scale animation appears to have a bug when applied to submodels. The
scaling is applied to a group of submodels, then when the first of the
group's life expires, the scale animation is reset and applied to the next
group. The use-personality tag might be expected to resolve this issue,
but
Detlef Faber
Am Donnerstag, den 10.05.2007, 23:55 +0200 schrieb Maik Justus:
Hi,
what's about using separate server(s) (not connected to the
classical servers) for the dogfight mode? If you log on a
classical server, you would have no dogfight capability.
Maik
I'd agree
contact me.
Regards
James
On 5/11/07, Vivian Meazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Detlef Faber
Am Donnerstag, den 10.05.2007, 23:55 +0200 schrieb Maik Justus:
Hi,
what's about using separate server(s) (not connected to the
classical servers) for the dogfight mode? If you log
James Palmer wrote:
I am seriously interested in adding dogfighting capability to FG.
I've been reading through the source for the past couple of days. (I've
only just stumbled upon FG.)
As I see it, the following changes would need to be implemented to have a
rudimentary dogfight.
1-
Martin
gh.robin wrote:
Their is a radar improvement, which has been developed recently by
Vivian.
[...]
That update has not been released into CVS.
Any pointer ? Why don't you simply post a follow-up to his
announcement, so people don't have to start searching,
Nick Warne wrote
On Thursday 10 May 2007 00:23:01 gh.robin wrote:
On Mon 7 May 2007 17:05, Nick Warne wrote:
Hi all,
There seems to be an issue, reported by a few in IRC.
Latest build from SVN/CVS makes FG unusable. Frame rates
are (for
me) at least 60% worse.
Martin
Vivian Meazza wrote:
I discussed the improved radar with Melchior, he is very
reluctant to
include it because it is plib only.
Well, personally I'd agree with him on that one,
Martin.
Well, there you go then, you won't get it in the next release. And I will do
Martin Spott
Harald JOHNSEN wrote:
Martin Spott wrote:
Vivian Meazza wrote:
I discussed the improved radar with Melchior, he is very
reluctant
to include it because it is plib only.
Well, personally I'd agree with him on that one,
The next fg version is a version based
Hi
Just a few points:
FG does compile under MSVC8 with WIn XP
Which version are you trying to compile?
If FG compiled successfully, and stops at run time, the problem often lies
in the data. Do you have the right data for the version you are compiling?
The clue to the error can often be
Olaf Flebbe
Where did stackwalker come from? Nothing on FG web site and no
instructions as to whose version to download. Was it left
in by accident?
Also, getting the following link error. who makes this lib?
LINK : fatal error LNK1104: cannot open file 'OpenThreadsd.lib'
Harald JOHNSEN
Heiko Schulz wrote:
Hi,
Fine to see, that things come back to good! ;-)
But I am a very little disappointed that the chrome
shader isn't broken anymore: the broken shader made a
very good glass shader.
You can see ist her on a developement pic:
Melchior FRANZ
* Detlef Faber -- 4/14/2007 11:42 AM:
after my OSG-CVS rebuild last week I noticed that Tower
View seems to
be broken.
Yes, I know. I broke it last week and will fix it in the next
days. (I
had thought that
nobody would notice. ;-)
The reason was that the
Csaba Halász
On 4/12/07, Vivian Meazza wrote:
Why do you want to offset a TACAN position?
You know why: because on the carriers the tacan altitude is 100
feet. And that *is* fixed, no matter where the carrier happens to
be. It should be fixed relative to the carrier. So
gh.robin wrote:
... Snip ...
Hello Vivian, Csaba
I am a TACAN user, with Tankers and Carriers, (mainly
developing French Navy
Aircraft models) i have read with interest that long conversation.
I can say, the existing TACAN system, which has been
implemented and improved
by Vivian
Csaba Halász
Hello!
I have looked into tacan code when investigating a bug found by Nick.
From the one-liner fix it grew to this massive patch. Here is what I
did:
Moved tacan parameters from carrier_nav.dat to the
appropriate model node in the property tree (eg.
Csaba Halász
On 4/12/07, Vivian Meazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doesn't make any sense to me - what bug are you trying to fix?
None, it is already fixed. This is just a follow-up.
Why do you want to offset a TACAN position?
You know why: because on the carriers the tacan altitude
Nick Warne wrote:
On Friday 06 April 2007 14:00:14 AJ MacLeod wrote:
The tanker in refueling_demo doesn't have TACAN at all. In fact, I
think we have a bit of needless duplication with those
demos, and one
of them could be removed without too much pain...
OK, Csaba found the bug
Markus Zojer
Hello all!
First off, when linking the B-2(yasim) to the generic aar.nas I
experienced a constant switching of the engines/out-of-fuel property
which unsurprisingly results in low thrust. Could this be
related to the
broken fuel-consumed-lbs property (of yasim?) that is
Melchior wrote:
* Dave Perry -- Saturday 24 March 2007:
Does anyone know what happened to John Denker?
My way or the highway?
I am still interested in the improved altimeter/atmosphere
model being
added to FlightGear.
So am I. I had just done code review and pointed out
Dene wrote:
By the way , I've also enabled the Victoria ferries , nice
addition .
I
added a screenshot to my webpage of one leaving Port
Angeles... I'll
probably add a Vancouver route too
Aww...com'on Syd...what's the URL?...since I can't see Vivians
Nick wrote
Hi all,
Flying the Spitfire, if you get airborne and then drop the
throttle to zero,
the gear warning alarm klaxon sounds. Hitting 'k' or 'K' to
turn this off
then produces:
Nasal runtime error: non-objects have no members
at
Syd wrote
HI all , playing around with Traffic , having fun , but noticed a few
things .
Just want to know if Im doing something wrong , or I'm expecting
something that doesnt work yet
Aircraft seem to appear only if you start at about the same
time a s the
departure time:
Ive sat
Hi,
I've just added to cvs (with Melchior assistance/advice) the facility for
AIShips to follow a 'flightplan', and added a scenario to demonstrate it in
cvs-data (PAVictoria_demo.xml). This has a couple of ferries running between
Port Angeles and Victoria, British Columbia. The new code
Melchior
* Melchior FRANZ -- Sunday 25 February 2007:
I would fix the files if people agree that what I consider a bug is
indeed a bug.
I assume that the whole stuff should be dumped and replaced with
geo_*_wgs_84() functions, right? And this is the end of my
one-man thread. :-)
Pep.
Sorry, I forgot to post the bitmap... Here it is...
Regarding the command-line thing, it might be good to start
there. However, what should be the right tool to use when it
comes the time to set up the GUI?
I'm not entirely clear about what you require, but your picture looks
John Denker wrote
On 01/31/2007 05:59 PM, AJ MacLeod wrote:
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I suspect you're only looking at
aircraft
which use old fashioned simple XML electrical systems.
Most vaguely recent aircraft which have had any significant attention
paid to
their
Nick Warne wrote
Hi all,
Latest CVS osg
I found the magnetic compass isn't working in the Spitfire/Seafire.
After a lot of faffing about (using the Hurricane compass as reference, as
that worked), I found the issue... or rather diff did.
--- Spitfire/Models/compass.xml 2006-12-28
Josh Babcock wrote
I'm having trouble with OSG and debian's giflib3g-dev package.
When I try to compile OSG, i get the following error. Has anyone else
seen this? If not, I will take it to the OSG list. I am compiling the
version in OSG_OP_OT-1.2-Flightgear.tar.gz
Josh
You don't need
Hi,
There have been several complaints about our fauna, namely headless cows,
over on the IRC channel. I've done one with a head:
ftp://ftp.abbeytheatre.dyndns.org/fgfs/Screen-shots/lowish-poly-cow.jpg
it's 180 vertices, so heads ain't free. If no one objects, I intend to
replace the headless
Olaf Flebbe wrote
now FlightGear OSG is running almost at the same speed (sometimes
faster) than plib for me.
FreeGlut was the culprit. Switching the the good old glut gives another
10% FPS boost. And it fixes a bug: For me the c172p with freeglut is
accellerating itself at the runway
Mathias Fröhlich
On Tuesday 21 November 2006 22:44, Georg Vollnhals wrote:
I can only confirm the big fps improvement, with the OSG cvs compile of
this evening I get (nearly) stable 85 fps at KSFO with the Cessna.
This might say nothing to you, but the *very first* OSG compile started
I wrote:
Here' a nice effect:
ftp://ftp.abbeytheatre.dyndns.org/fgfs/Screen-shots/floodlight.jpg
But I don't think it's intentional. Something wrong with LMT and GMT
perhaps? It looks as if the illumination of the ac is at noon, while the
scenery is midnight.
Now if we could do that
Hi,
Here' a nice effect:
ftp://ftp.abbeytheatre.dyndns.org/fgfs/Screen-shots/floodlight.jpg
But I don't think it's intentional. Something wrong with LMT and GMT
perhaps? It looks as if the illumination of the ac is at noon, while the
scenery is midnight.
Now if we could do that for all the ac
Mathias Fröhlich wrote
It would still be interesting why we get consistently bad performance
reports
on win32 and most unix users report equal to much better performance...
It certainly would. My system comprises a P4 2.8 with .5 Gb RAM and a
recently purchased nVidia FX 6200 with 256 Mb
Olaf Flebbe wrote:
FYI: I did a major overhaul to the build system for MSVC8 (again). Now
with a common infrastructure for building OSG itself, FlightGear/Plib
branch and FlightGear/OSG. Now FlightGear is linked dynamically, even in
the plib case, making support more easy.
I wrote:
I see a great improvement in frame rates - now only about 10%
down.
Perhaps a little optimistic: 20% down would be more accurate. Still a very
worthwhile gain though.
Vivian
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more?
Andrew Gluszynski
Hi all,
I dont normaly post to this mailing list, but i think the web site has
been hacked?
It has, but this still works http://flightgear.org/
Vivian
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need
Maik Justus wrote
Hi Georg,
very good new. Thanks to Mathias for this improvement.
Maik
Georg Vollnhals schrieb:
Hi,
I just did some further tests with the LAST NEW OSG version from Mathias
and
GOOD NEWS, really improved framerates
(test details as already reported, not
Lets hope that youre correct. Right now we
have _fewer_ features, and a _lower_ frame rate. I hope that adding back
the features we used to have wont further reduce the frame rate, let
alone adding new ones.
Were in danger of limiting the use of FG to high end
machines. I have a
Martin Spott
Vivian Meazza wrote:
Let's hope that you're correct. Right now we have _fewer_ features, and
a
_lower_ frame rate. I hope that adding back the features we used to have
won't further reduce the frame rate, let alone adding new ones.
Hey, guys, you're talking about
Frederic Bouvier
Quoting Vivian Meazza :
Martin Spott
Vivian Meazza wrote:
Let's hope that you're correct. Right now we have _fewer_ features,
and
a
_lower_ frame rate. I hope that adding back the features we used to
have
won't further reduce the frame rate, let
Fred wrote:
Selon Vivian Meazza :
Yes, I saw you had fixed that, but that's the only one with that
particular
problem. Since it worked under plib, and AC3D didn't complain, I would
never
have worked that one out - thank you. If only the rest were that easy -
the
others seem
Olaf Flebbe
However, FG-OSG compiled using Olaf's stuff (for which we must be most
grateful) is both significantly slower to load and run than FG-Plib
compiled
with MSVC8 here.
You actually see a slowdown on loading ?
Yes, I haven't timed it exactly, but I would estimate 15=25%
Ralf Gerlich
Hi,
Ralf Gerlich wrote:
- transparency issues:
- runway lights shine through panel:
http://www.custom-scenery.org/fileadmin/fg_osg/fgfs-screen-001.png
http://www.custom-scenery.org/fileadmin/fg_osg/fgfs-screen-002.png
- runway lights shine through cloud
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:flightgear-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Olaf Flebbe
Sent: 05 November 2006 22:43
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Cc: Mathias Fröhlich
Subject: [Flightgear-devel] OSG Performance on WIndows
Hi,
while double (and
Olaf Flebbe wrote
Hi,
i noticed that the version of flightgear i built from scratch using
cygwin takes significantly more time to start up (about 4-5
minutes) than the one i installed using the exe-file from
flightgear.org http://flightgear.org (about 1-2 minutes). is there
any
Hi,
SG-CVS fails to build under MSVC8 atm. It fails in SGQuat.hxx. copysign is
not recognised. Replacing
sin05ang = copysign(sqrt(sin05ang), sig);
with
sin05ang = _copysign(sqrt(sin05ang), sig);
^
seems to do the trick
Vivian
Hi,
Just a quick report on some tests with FG-OSG compiled under MSVC8 using
Olaf's project files etc. that I've carried out on the models for which I am
responsible:
Hurricane/Spitfire/Seafire won't start. The starter spins
continuously, but the engine won't fire.
A4F crashes FG,
Michal Fabik
Hello,
I've cvs-updated the simgear source a couple of hours
back and encountered the following:
1) configure says I don't have openAL installed which
is not true. Reinstalling openAL with --prefix=/usr
fixed this.
2) make says
.
.
.
In file included from
lights (when scenery path stays
unspecified).
I think Vivian Meazza described a similar problem over here: http://mail.flightgear.org/pipermail/flightgear-devel/2005-August/038846.html
Hardware problems seem unlikely since FG worked properly on the same
machine when installed over
Hi,
You might find this an amusing take on someone else's Flight Sim
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tcW3hbnR2EI
Made me laugh anyway,
Vivian
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's
Hi,
Melchior has produced a nice addition to the Seahawk: the managed view.
This adjusts the pilot's view to where he might look during manoeuvres. I
have adjusted the g-effects (black/red-out and head shake) to suit.
We think it makes a worthwhile enhancement to the realism of flying the
Syd
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:flightgear-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of sandy
Sent: 30 July 2006 08:23
To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Flightgear-devel] chrome animation
Is there a way to blend the chrome texture without completely
Melchior
Seems that there are two bugs that make the bo105 ASI show
positive speeds when flying backwards:
1. YASim delivers a positive /velocities/airspeed-kt on backward
flight.
2. Systems/pitot.cxx wouldn't handle negative values correctly,
anyway, as it squares the speed
Arnt Karlsen
On Mon, 03 Jul 2006 00:28:06 -0400, Josh wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..this works, thanks, but I _should_ be able to use Ralf's Makefile
too. The idea is make this useable off a Live CD too.
Oh, I see. Yes, it should come with a
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:flightgear-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Arnt Karlsen
Sent: 03 July 2006 17:08
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: [Flightgear-devel] ..fixed, was:..~/.cvspass???
On Mon, 3 Jul 2006 15:10:03 +0100, Vivian wrote in
Justin Smithies asked:
Me and Syd have implemented the wxradar into our 777-200 model and have
noticed that it will only display the clouds if 3d clouds are selected.
Is there a reason for this or is it simply something that was overlooked ?
The wxradar displays the positions of the 3d
Dave Perry
I have had lock-ups on longer X-C flights with the pa24-250 recently
that could be from a memory leak. So I used the system monitor to check
on VM growth. The only 2D pannel used in the pa24-250 is the radio
stack. So I tried commenting out various components of the radio
Georg Vollnhals wrote
when I try running flightgear. Very, very frustrating. I hate to do
this,
but I guess I will next try to completely delete all cygwin directories.
This is just so strange.
This was the only solution for me which worked!
I'd really like to know how many are
Josh
What property can I increment to change the channel on the TACAN? I have
a knob on a TACAN instrument that is supposed to either inc/dec the
channel, or the x/y selector, depending on the position of another
switch. I could do this by introducing another property and some nasal
to
Josh Babcock wrote
Vivian Meazza wrote:
Josh
What property can I increment to change the channel on the TACAN? I
have
a knob on a TACAN instrument that is supposed to either inc/dec the
channel, or the x/y selector, depending on the position of another
switch. I could do
Lee Elliott wrote
On Saturday 17 June 2006 20:18, Vivian Meazza wrote:
Lee
On Saturday 17 June 2006 07:34, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Lee Elliott -- Saturday 17 June 2006 05:02:
Is anyone else seeing a memory leak in current cvs?
I would be surprised if we had no leaks
Lee
On Saturday 17 June 2006 07:34, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Lee Elliott -- Saturday 17 June 2006 05:02:
Is anyone else seeing a memory leak in current cvs?
I would be surprised if we had no leaks at all. But in a short
test with $ fgfs --aircraft=ufo --airport=kufo ... i didn't
Curt wrote
Vivian Meazza wrote:
There is one - nearly - as I said orientation/heading-magnetic-deg. But
it's
not derived from an instrument, and therefore has no supply, neither can
it
fail, not does it have any error. Further, use of such a property will
not
stop, AFAIKS
Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:flightgear-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Sent: 16 June 2006 10:26
To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Autopilot Bug/Feature
På 16.06.2006 10:19 CEST skrev Vivian
Hi,
In the course of developing the KC135, I noticed that parts of the autopilot
function do not work in that model, copied from the B737 - the bits
described as vor/loc and app. Investigation showed that the cause was simple
- in JSBSim a jet ac does not have vacuum system. No vacuum - no
inappropriate for
even halfway recent military or civil aircraft.
Vivian Meazza wrote:
In the course of developing the KC135, I noticed that parts of the
autopilot
function do not work in that model, copied from the B737 - the bits
described as vor/loc and app. Investigation showed that the cause
Jon
In the course of developing the KC135, I noticed that parts
of the autopilot function do not work in that model, copied
from the B737 - the bits described as vor/loc and app.
Investigation showed that the cause was simple
- in JSBSim a jet ac does not have vacuum system. No vacuum
AJ wrote
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 21:51, Josh Babcock wrote:
Can't you just supply whatever property regarding the vacuum system that
the instrument is looking for?
He could (which ISTR I had to do for the Lightning) but I think it would
be
nice to have the correct system available
Josh
Vivian Meazza wrote:
Hi,
In the course of developing the KC135, I noticed that parts of the
autopilot
function do not work in that model, copied from the B737 - the bits
described as vor/loc and app. Investigation showed that the cause was
simple
- in JSBSim a jet ac does
Justin Smithies
Hi all
Curtis has just uploaded mine Syd Adams new 777-200 model to
the FG
d/l section.
It has cabin lights switchable , logo lights and strobes / landing gear.
3d cockpit , although the AP requires some work, so if anyone can tweek
the AP
to work correctly we
Ron Jensen
Hi Vivian
I'm more than willing to be corrected on this one, but my understanding
is
as follows:
A VORTAC station has 3 frequencies in RL - TACAN, VOR, and DME.
This is my understanding, too. Further A TACAN channel includes 3
frequencies, Two for TACAN/DME and one
Ron Jensen
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:flightgear-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Sent: 02 June 2006 04:29
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgmap navaids
On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 11:04 +1000, Pigeon wrote:
The only
Gonzalo Aguilar Delgado
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:flightgear-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Sent: 02 June 2006 12:56
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Light inside the cockpit
Yep, you have
shavlir
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:flightgear-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of @uiuc.edu
Sent: 25 May 2006 04:31
To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Flightgear-devel] harrier checkin
Since those of you who have checkin access never seem to
Hi,
AAR
is fun, if a little tricky. These screen shots were taken with an AI tanker.
ftp://ftp.abbeytheatre.dyndns.org/fgfs/Screen-shots/KC135-KC135-1.jpg
ftp://ftp.abbeytheatre.dyndns.org/fgfs/Screen-shots/KC135-cockpit.jpg
The KC135 is AAR
capable so a full fuel load was
Hi,
We have now completed and committed to CVS the next stage in development of
our AAR capability - user to user AAR over the Multiplayer(MP) Network. This
comprises:
Updated code in cvs AIModels
Updated carrier_nav.dat.gz file
A flyable tanker - the KC135
AA TACAN which can now detect MP
Dave
I committed a new facility for the A4F yesterday. It now has a
functioning
AAR capability with YASim, like the one already available for JSBSim.
...
Great. I can't wait to try it out. BTW, now I can stop using the T-38 as
a
refueling demonstrator :) It's still a radar
Hi,
I committed a new facility for the A4F yesterday. It now has a functioning
AAR capability with YASim, like the one already available for JSBSim. I have
also taken the opportunity to adjust the panel to make it more nearly like
that of an A4F, rather than an A4C, although a couple of the
Ron Jensen
http://www.jentronics.com/fgfs/
Here is another update to the F4E, same place as it always is
http://www.jentronics.com/fgfs/F4E.tgz
Today's update has some cosmetic fixes to the 3D model, it now rotates
around its axises correctly. (Thanks Dave) It also has afterburner
Fred
Vivian Meazza a écrit :
Fred
This is what I am getting with CVS today ( --aircraft=a4f ) :
Failed to load submodel: Failed to open file
at i:/FlightGear/cvs/fgfsbase/Aircraft/a4/Models/strop.xml
Failed to load aircraft from Aircraft/a4/Models/a4f-blue.xml
(Falling
Fred
This is what I am getting with CVS today ( --aircraft=a4f ) :
Failed to load submodel: Failed to open file
at i:/FlightGear/cvs/fgfsbase/Aircraft/a4/Models/strop.xml
Failed to load aircraft from Aircraft/a4/Models/a4f-blue.xml
(Falling back to glider.ac.)
I haven't changed
Fred
This is what I am getting with CVS today ( --aircraft=a4f ) :
Failed to load submodel: Failed to open file
at i:/FlightGear/cvs/fgfsbase/Aircraft/a4/Models/strop.xml
Failed to load aircraft from Aircraft/a4/Models/a4f-blue.xml
(Falling back to glider.ac.)
MSVC or cygwin headers and libraries, but please do
not mix them.
Olaf
2006/4/2, Vivian Meazza [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Olaf Flebbe
Yes there is a patch outstanding. Please go to the FlightGearLib
Project in the solution explorer right click, select properties (the
last entry
Fred
Unfortunately, I discovered that submodels no longer work. I downloaded
Fred's binary of -0.9.10-pre3 this morning, and they no longer work
there
either. So far as I can see, they are still working under Cygwin as of
last
night.
Do you have a test case ? What should I do to
801 - 900 of 927 matches
Mail list logo
