Re: [Flightgear-devel] gnome 3 ?
Le 03/06/2011 06:10, Curtis Olson a écrit : Is anyone here running gnome 3 (and you would probably know if you were.) :-) I just loaded up Fedora 15 on a test machine and my first comment was hmmm... I haven't tried to get FlightGear running. I guess I can't imagine why it wouldn't run just fine although the desktop requires accelerated opengl hardware so I hope there won't be too much competition for resources when running FlightGear. Does anyone have any feed back on issues or problems specific to the new gnome 3 desktop scheme? Building/running FlightGear? Looks like the linux desktop folks have stopped chasing windows and are now chasing mac? Quote from an online review: gnome 3 gives you any color theme you like ... if you like black. Is gnome 3 viable for real work? I've heard gnome 3 and intuitive mentioned in the same sentence. I guess I'm going to have to go lookup the definition of intuitive again -- oh here it is -- something that makes obvious sense after you've figured it out. :-) Curt. -- Curtis Olson: http://www.atiak.com - http://aem.umn.edu/~uav/ http://aem.umn.edu/%7Euav/ http://www.flightgear.org - http://gallinazo.flightgear.org Hello, I recently installed GNOME 3 on Debian and there is no problem with FlightGear. I have a nVidia GT240 graphic card. GNOME 3 is not yet very stable on my machine, but it was my choice to install packages from the experimental repository :-). It was difficult for me to get used to it at the beginning, but now I find it very practical. But it is harder to configure than before (not only the theme, but everything else) and I think it's a bad idea. gnome-tweak-tool and dconf-editor help a bit If you don't know them already. Guillaume signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- Simplify data backup and recovery for your virtual environment with vRanger. Installation's a snap, and flexible recovery options mean your data is safe, secure and there when you need it. Discover what all the cheering's about. Get your free trial download today. http://p.sf.net/sfu/quest-dev2dev2 ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] dual head problem
jean pellotier a crit: Anders Gidenstam a crit : However, it would not be good if FlightGear/OSG cannot be instructed which X screen to start on. Have you tried setting DISPLAY ? yes I did, setting DISPLAY to :0.1 other programs work but not FG-cvs-OSG, i will try command to configure OSG in preference.xml, as soon as i've got the files. As a side note I think it would be great if FlightGear could honour the standard X client command line arguments -geometry and -display . I think it didn't the last time I tried. Cheers, Anders I have the same bug, FG/OSG always opens on the :0 display, although my $DISPLAY has an other value. I think it's not due to OSG itself, because osgviewer has not this bug. Guillaume - SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
[Flightgear-devel] LFRK scenery
Hi, I have improved the apt.dat.gz for Caen-Carpiquet (LFRK) but I have a problem with TerraGear: the terrain is too low and there are holes. Can someone generate the scenery or explain me how to do?? I'll place some points (a antenna, a cement work, a bridge...) Thank you, Guillaume LFRK.dat Description: MOPAC data - This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse012070mrt/direct/01/___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
