Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgdata merge request 91:Animated Jetways
So if it's normal, it's ok for me! Thank you! Sorry for the noise! Cheers, Julien Le 28/08/2012 04:28, Ryan M a écrit : > Hello Julien, > > Those files are "dummy" models; they serve no purpose whatsoever > except to specify the texture paths for the different airlines in the > jetway models. Trying to load them as full models will cause > FlightGear to not find a model, and- you guessed it- not find this > mythical "AirlineSign" object.;-) > > I'll admit it is an odd setup, and probably one that deserves a > rethink in the future. I'm considering a partial rewrite of my Nasal > files during the FG 3.0.0 development cycle, so I'll definitely take a > look here. > > ~Ryan -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgdata merge request 91:Animated Jetways
Hi Ryan, When I wanted to create some thumbnails for the models in scenemodels.com, every models named generic.airline.***.xml doesn't display anything in Flightgear and I met the following error: Could not find at least one of the following objects for animation: 'AirlineSign' Same problem with the model from fgdata git and terrasync. Don't know where it comes, I'm not really an expert on it. Cheers, Julien Le 26/08/2012 03:19, A Person a écrit : > Martin, > > I can assure you that I do care. Over the past several months, life > has been really occupying me and I have not had much time to check > email or keep up with the FlightGear mailing list. Sorry for missing > your messages; the only reason I was able to catch this one was > because a friend on IRC informed me of it. > > Feel free to discuss the problems with the jetways. I _did_ push a > small maintenance commit before 2.8 was released; as of now, they > should work fine. > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:13 AM, Martin Spott wrote: >> Hi, if anybody meets Ryan Miller, please let him know that there appear >> to be issues with the current state of the Jetways. >> I've tried to get in contact with him several times over the past >> months, but never got a response - I have no idea wether his EMail >> address changed or if he just doesn't care. >> >> Cheers, >> Martin. >> -- >> Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are ! >> -- >> >> -- >> Live Security Virtual Conference >> Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and >> threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions >> will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware >> threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ >> ___ >> Flightgear-devel mailing list >> Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel > -- > Live Security Virtual Conference > Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and > threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions > will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware > threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ > ___ > Flightgear-devel mailing list > Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-commitlogs] FlightGear
I changed my git username with this command line:
git config --global user.name "My name"
Sorry for the noise.
Cheers,
Julien Nguyen
Le 07/06/2012 16:49, Martin Spott a écrit :
> Julien Nguyen wrote:
>
>> Oh, it's me...
>>
>> Have I done something wrong ? (I don't know with this nickname was used by
>> the way)
> I think the key is to understand the particular difference between the
> GIT repository and the Gitorious web site.
> Apparently Gitorious somehow manages to translate the GIT nicknames
> into Gitorious accounts, but of course the GIT repository doesn't know
> about the Gitorious web site. Therefore a "git log" will show just the
> names (and/or EMail addresses) you put into every single GIT commit.
>
> Cheers,
> Martin.
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions
will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware
threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-commitlogs] FlightGear Scenery/Web tools branch, master,
Oh, it's me... Have I done something wrong ? (I don't know with this nickname was used by the way) Le 07/06/2012 13:14, Martin Spott a écrit : > Flightgear-commitlogs wrote: >> The branch, master has been updated >> >> - Log - >> commit 01cd74bef43ff957270c4d56743b284f23a32732 >> Author: Blackiris >> Date: Wed Jun 6 10:29:37 2012 +0200 >> >> Add footer and other HTML stuff > Could anyone tell me who this weird contributor "Blackiris" is in > real life ? > > Cheers, > Martin. -- Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Looking at a nice project from outside
Hi Martin, I sent you yesterday some new scenery models to add and I haven't paid attention to the emails on fg mailing list... For one year I'm working as a scenery modeler, I didn't know all the problems you met, and I'm deeply sorry for being so ignorant. As a FG user, I really support the idea to have one main common scenery, because it's more convenient thanks to Terrasync and I'm sure there are a lot of people who think like this too. Flightgear is an open source project and it's a good opportunity to do that. Thank you so much for all your work and your contribution to Flightgear. You deserve some rest and as Pedro said, I also hope one day to see you come back, with new ideas. I will also join the IRC discussion about that. I stopped using it a few months ago but now, I think it's time to come back. Thank you Martin! Julien Le 24/02/2012 16:03, Martin Spott a écrit : > Gijs de Rooy wrote: > >> To give one recent example that applies to most of these reasons: LOWI. It >> has an updated airport layout, custom landclassing >> and is under heavy development. The author told me that he'll put all of it >> in the database once it is finished. > Just for the record, that's one of the common, big, but most avoidable > mistakes: "Submitting when it's finished". I know, it's _really_ > common, but always carries the risk of making the same mistake with > every of the included models. > Guess how many hours I spent fixing the same stupid mistake in a row of > models, mistakes which could have been avoided if people would have > sent me each of these models _early_ !? Submitting early allows for > early feedback and, as a consequence, for preventing avoidable mistakes > early in the development phase of an airfield scenario, thus > facilitating the rest of the submission process. > > I didn't track the number of hours, but, believe me, it kept me busy - > and just for the stupid reason because people neither bothered reading > our "Contribute" recommendations nor considered my advice. > > I know, Gijs, it's not your fault, I just hooked up because you > mentioned. > > Cheers, > Martin. -- Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/ ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Looking at a nice project from outside
Hi Martin, I sent you yesterday some new scenery models to add and I haven't paid attention to the emails on fg mailing list... For one year I'm working as a scenery modeler, I didn't know all the problems you met, and I'm deeply sorry for being so ignorant. As a FG user, I really support the idea to have one main common scenery, because it's more convenient thanks to Terrasync and I'm sure there are a lot of people who think like this too. Flightgear is an open source project and it's a good opportunity to do that. Thank you so much for all your work and your contribution to Flightgear. You deserve some rest and as Pedro said, I also hope one day to see you come back, with new ideas. I will also join the IRC discussion about that. I stopped using it a few months ago but now, I think it's time to come back. Thank you Martin! Julien Le 24/02/2012 16:03, Martin Spott a écrit : > Gijs de Rooy wrote: > >> To give one recent example that applies to most of these reasons: LOWI. It >> has an updated airport layout, custom landclassing >> and is under heavy development. The author told me that he'll put all of it >> in the database once it is finished. > Just for the record, that's one of the common, big, but most avoidable > mistakes: "Submitting when it's finished". I know, it's _really_ > common, but always carries the risk of making the same mistake with > every of the included models. > Guess how many hours I spent fixing the same stupid mistake in a row of > models, mistakes which could have been avoided if people would have > sent me each of these models _early_ !? Submitting early allows for > early feedback and, as a consequence, for preventing avoidable mistakes > early in the development phase of an airfield scenario, thus > facilitating the rest of the submission process. > > I didn't track the number of hours, but, believe me, it kept me busy - > and just for the stupid reason because people neither bothered reading > our "Contribute" recommendations nor considered my advice. > > I know, Gijs, it's not your fault, I just hooked up because you > mentioned. > > Cheers, > Martin. -- Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/ ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
