Re: [Flightgear-devel] Mystery Airport
Hi Alasair What is the problem with Dubbo a quick google seems to show that YSDU is still the valid ICAO code for Dubbo and my 2.0 version shows YSDU for Dubbo in the select airport dialog. Cheers Innis For anyone working with ATC, these are further airport inconsistencies I have found in the AI/Traffic files vs apt.dat as at today's date. ADR.xml SHPK/LATI EZY.xml EEGP/EGGP MAS.xml WOMM/VOMM VOBL/VOBG apt.dat out of date VOHS/VOHY WADD/WRRR WARJ/WIIJ WARR/WRSJ QFL.xml Dubbo/YSDU Regards, Alasdair -- Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel -- Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Mystery Airport
On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 19:42 +0800, Innis Cunningham wrote: Hi Alasair What is the problem with Dubbo a quick google seems to show that YSDU is still the valid ICAO code for Dubbo and my 2.0 version shows YSDU for Dubbo in the select airport dialog. Cheers Innis In QFL.xml, flights QF2046 QF2048 have the arrival port entered literally as the name Dubbo rather than the ICAO code YSDU. Kind Regards, Alasdair -- Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Mystery Airport
Hi Alasdair Oh Ok I am not sure how that slipped through I will look at it.The best I can suggest is for you to amend your local copy as I would not think it will change any time soon in FG.Thanks for the heads up. And it is nice to know someone else is using Australian traffic. Cheers Innis On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 19:42 +0800, Innis Cunningham wrote: Hi Alasair What is the problem with Dubbo a quick google seems to show that YSDU is still the valid ICAO code for Dubbo and my 2.0 version shows YSDU for Dubbo in the select airport dialog. Cheers Innis In QFL.xml, flights QF2046 QF2048 have the arrival port entered literally as the name Dubbo rather than the ICAO code YSDU. Kind Regards, Alasdair -- Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel -- Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Mystery Airport
On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 12:08 +, Alasdair wrote: On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 19:42 +0800, Innis Cunningham wrote: Hi Alasair What is the problem with Dubbo a quick google seems to show that YSDU is still the valid ICAO code for Dubbo and my 2.0 version shows YSDU for Dubbo in the select airport dialog. Cheers Innis In QFL.xml, flights QF2046 QF2048 have the arrival port entered literally as the name Dubbo rather than the ICAO code YSDU. Kind Regards, Alasdair Actually aren't these supposed to be depart/arrive pairs. If that is the case, I suspect the left-hand is YSSY, so it should be; YSSY/YSDU S. -- Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Mystery Airport
Hi, Thanks for reporting. I'll update those during my next round of revisions (which may still take a while, as I'm still quite busy with my new job). Cheers, Durk On 21 Nov 2010, at 23:05, Alasdair wrote: On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 20:01 +0100, Csaba Halász wrote: On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 7:55 PM, Alasdair ali...@btinternet.com wrote: Could someone correct this in git, please Done. For anyone working with ATC, these are further airport inconsistencies I have found in the AI/Traffic files vs apt.dat as at today's date. ADR.xml SHPK/LATI EZY.xml EEGP/EGGP MAS.xml WOMM/VOMM VOBL/VOBG apt.dat out of date VOHS/VOHY WADD/WRRR WARJ/WIIJ WARR/WRSJ QFL.xml Dubbo/YSDU Regards, Alasdair -- Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel -- Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Mystery Airport
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Durk Talsma durkt...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Thanks for reporting. I'll update those during my next round of revisions (which may still take a while, as I'm still quite busy with my new job). Does it cause any problems if I commit the obvious fixes to git? I have already done WOMM-VOMM. -- Csaba/Jester -- Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Mystery Airport
Hi Csaba, Shouldn't be any problem. I have some tools to fetch upstream fixes and incorporate these back into my main database (and a streamlined version of those tools is waiting to be included into the scripts subdirectory of FlightGear / git soon). Cheers, Durk On 22 Nov 2010, at 14:47, Csaba Halász wrote: On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Durk Talsma durkt...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, Thanks for reporting. I'll update those during my next round of revisions (which may still take a while, as I'm still quite busy with my new job). Does it cause any problems if I commit the obvious fixes to git? I have already done WOMM-VOMM. -- Csaba/Jester -- Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel -- Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
[Flightgear-devel] Mystery Airport
Traffic file MAS.xml contains fights to an airport WOMM. It is not in apt.dat, and googling it reveals nothing. Can anyone help me identify it or correct it? Kind regards, Alasdair -- Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Mystery Airport
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Alasdair ali...@btinternet.com wrote: Traffic file MAS.xml contains fights to an airport WOMM. It is not in apt.dat, and googling it reveals nothing. Can anyone help me identify it or correct it? I think flight 0180 should be from WMKK to VOMM (with a plain V, not a W) At least that's what google told me ;) -- Cheers, Csaba/Jester -- Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Mystery Airport
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 7:55 PM, Alasdair ali...@btinternet.com wrote: Could someone correct this in git, please Done. -- Csaba/Jester -- Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Mystery Airport
On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 19:51 +0100, Csaba Halász wrote: On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Csaba Halász csaba.hal...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Alasdair ali...@btinternet.com wrote: Traffic file MAS.xml contains fights to an airport WOMM. It is not in apt.dat, and googling it reveals nothing. Can anyone help me identify it or correct it? I think flight 0180 should be from WMKK to VOMM (with a plain V, not a W) Indeed, scrolling down to flight 0181 (the reverse trip) you can see it has VOMM. You are a genius. I will ammend my local repos. Could someone correct this in git, please Thanks -- Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Mystery Airport
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Csaba Halász csaba.hal...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Alasdair ali...@btinternet.com wrote: Traffic file MAS.xml contains fights to an airport WOMM. It is not in apt.dat, and googling it reveals nothing. Can anyone help me identify it or correct it? I think flight 0180 should be from WMKK to VOMM (with a plain V, not a W) Indeed, scrolling down to flight 0181 (the reverse trip) you can see it has VOMM. -- Csaba/Jester -- Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Mystery Airport
On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 20:01 +0100, Csaba Halász wrote: On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 7:55 PM, Alasdair ali...@btinternet.com wrote: Could someone correct this in git, please Done. For anyone working with ATC, these are further airport inconsistencies I have found in the AI/Traffic files vs apt.dat as at today's date. ADR.xml SHPK/LATI EZY.xml EEGP/EGGP MAS.xml WOMM/VOMM VOBL/VOBG apt.dat out of date VOHS/VOHY WADD/WRRR WARJ/WIIJ WARR/WRSJ QFL.xml Dubbo/YSDU Regards, Alasdair -- Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
