[Flightgear-devel] Re: [PATCH] No sound device fixes
* Pigeon -- Sunday 23 April 2006 14:31: It would be, IMHO, good, if we're not creating the sound manager, and the FGFX and FGVoiceMgr if either we couldn't find a sound device we could use or we want to disable sound completely. The voice manager doesn't need a device. It can send the messages over network to a computer which *has* a sound device. One could only avoid adding the subsystem if the user didn't enable the feature at all. Not that it would buy us anything: the subsystem does only burn cyclyes for an if (!foo) return; That's all, and the reason for it is that I considered to make it possible to activate the voice subsystem even after the init phase (via dialog). What again were the advantages? m. --- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: [PATCH] No sound device fixes
On Sunday 23 April 2006 14:43, Melchior FRANZ wrote: * Pigeon -- Sunday 23 April 2006 14:31: It would be, IMHO, good, if we're not creating the sound manager, and the FGFX and FGVoiceMgr if either we couldn't find a sound device we could use or we want to disable sound completely. The voice manager doesn't need a device. It can send the messages over network to a computer which *has* a sound device. One could only avoid adding the subsystem if the user didn't enable the feature at all. Not that it would buy us anything: the subsystem does only burn cyclyes for an if (!foo) return; That's all, and the reason for it is that I considered to make it possible to activate the voice subsystem even after the init phase (via dialog). What again were the advantages? The advantage of his attached patch is that flightgear does not just crash if for some reason no sound device is found. Applied, Thanks! Mathias -- Mathias Fröhlich, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid0709bid3057dat1642 ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
[Flightgear-devel] Re: [PATCH] No sound device fixes
* Mathias Fröhlich -- Sunday 23 April 2006 17:29: On Sunday 23 April 2006 14:43, Melchior FRANZ wrote: * Pigeon -- Sunday 23 April 2006 14:31: It would be, IMHO, good, if we're not creating the sound manager, and the FGFX and FGVoiceMgr if either [...] ^^ The voice manager doesn't need a device. [...] What again were the advantages? ^ The advantage of his attached patch [...] I was talking about the voice manager *only*. Not this patch. m. --- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnkkid=120709bid=263057dat=121642 ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
