Erik Hofman wrote:
James Turner wrote:
I think this is a good example of why 'using std::xxx' is potentially
problematic in headers (especially public library headers, i.e
Simgear), but fine in sources. So if I'm doing future cleanups, that's
the approach I'd take - remove 'using'
Tim Moore wrote:
To add my two cents:
I mostly favor putting using declarations at the top of source files
instead
of using namespace qualifiers in the code. On the other hand, I would
probably
use the namespace qualifer explicitly if the symbol in question is somewhat
obscure, to give
To continue this discussion a bit (please add your comments) James an I
had a short discussion about using std::string (for example) everywhere
in the file or using using std::string; at the beginning. James
pointed out that the suing std:: statement in header files might not be
a good idea,
On 30 Jul 2008, at 11:29, Erik Hofman wrote:
To continue this discussion a bit (please add your comments) James
an I
had a short discussion about using std::string (for example)
everywhere
in the file or using using std::string; at the beginning. James
pointed out that the suing std::
* Erik Hofman -- Wednesday 30 July 2008:
To continue this discussion a bit (please add your comments) James an I
had a short discussion about using std::string (for example) everywhere
in the file or using using std::string; at the beginning.
I think this shouldn't be a policy question at
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Erik Hofman -- Wednesday 30 July 2008:
To continue this discussion a bit (please add your comments) James an I
had a short discussion about using std::string (for example) everywhere
in the file or using using std::string; at the beginning.
I think this shouldn't
* Erik Hofman -- Wednesday 30 July 2008:
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Erik Hofman -- Wednesday 30 July 2008:
IOW: Leave it to the developer.
Well I got some patches from James that turned 'using std::'
into std::, hence the question.
Yes, I undestood the situation and the question perfectly
On 30 Jul 2008, at 13:23, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
Actually, I think that putting std:: at every reference is
not preferable, as in 99% of the cases we mean std::string,
and in 100% we mean std::cout, so the prefix is basically
redundant noise. Do we actually have more than one or two
cases
James Turner wrote:
I think this is a good example of why 'using std::xxx' is potentially
problematic in headers (especially public library headers, i.e
Simgear), but fine in sources. So if I'm doing future cleanups, that's
the approach I'd take - remove 'using' from headers, and add it
* Melchior FRANZ -- Wednesday 30 July 2008:
Yes, I undestood the situation and the question perfectly well.
Argh, no, I didn't. I missed the headers part. Of course I
agree on that -- that's evil. Sorry for the redundant noise
then. ;-)
m.
10 matches
Mail list logo
