Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-users] Traffic Manager II

2008-07-31 Thread Durk Talsma
Hi Greg, On Monday 28 July 2008 17:13, Greg Hawkes wrote: My biggest problem with FlightGear's AI traffic is not the complexity of the XML files, nor the need to assign individual aircraft to flights (although anything that reduces that complexity is good). Instead, the biggest issue that I

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-users] Traffic Manager II

2008-07-28 Thread Greg Hawkes
Durk Talsma wrote: So what is traffic manager II? Well the main difference is that it will become a lot easier for users to develop their own traffic. Instead of going through a complicated procedure of compiling a sequence of flights into an xml file, the new version just requires a plain

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-users] Traffic Manager II

2008-07-28 Thread Martin Spott
Greg Hawkes wrote: One solution to this problem is to create a shared database of every (well, every /regularly scheduled/) flight everywhere in the world. This idea is similar to FlightGear's world scenery database. That project claims to aim for world domination, so why not have the same

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Flightgear-users] Traffic Manager II

2008-07-28 Thread Jon Stockill
Martin Spott wrote: Greg Hawkes wrote: One solution to this problem is to create a shared database of every (well, every /regularly scheduled/) flight everywhere in the world. This idea is similar to FlightGear's world scenery database. That project claims to aim for world domination, so