On Thursday 23 November 2006 20:47, Durk Talsma wrote:
> The most proper solution in this case is probably to remove the conditional
> if (current != i) (Since it cannot be false anyways). I'll give it a test,
> and if it works satisfactory I'll check it in.
>
> Thanks for the explanation Fred.
>
On Thursday 23 November 2006 20:27, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
> Durk Talsma a écrit :
> > Okay, that seems a reasonable request, which I can do, provided no ill
> > side effects show up on my development box.
> >
> > Still, I'd be interested in the expert opinion of another C++ coder who's
> > more f
Hi Maik,
It looks like I completely overlooked your message yesterday. I've been
playing with your idea a bit. Some more comments below.
On Wednesday 15 November 2006 19:53, Maik Justus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I built a version with debug info only for this file and got, as
> expected, normal performan
On Tuesday 14 November 2006 20:52, Olaf Flebbe wrote:
> > Anyone else observing these crashes?
>
> Yep.
>
> Olaf
>
Okay, I've committed my proposed fix to CVS Head. Please check.
Cheers,
Durk
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influ
4 matches
Mail list logo
