Hi Tomash
the navradio code is far from being perfect and and least to attempts
for improvements exist.
Unfortunately, both have currently stalled due to several reasons.
The first is in newnavradio which you can use by setting
use-new-navradio type=boolfalse/use-new-navradio in your aircraft
Let me ask my question here. In nav.dat file VORs have slave variation. As
I understand, slave variation of VOR depends on magnetic variation at he
location. Does Flightgear use this slave variation, or it computes magnetic
variation on the fly?
Do we need to track magnetic variation change every
On 08/05/2013 01:38 AM, Михаил Сойтанен wrote:
In nav.dat file VORs have slave variation. As
I understand, slave variation of VOR depends on magnetic variation at he
location. Does Flightgear use this slave variation, or it computes magnetic
variation on the fly?
Do we need to track magnetic
Hi Michail,
the navradio code uses the magnetic variation as stored in nav.dat for
the VOR.
The environmental magnetic variation is not used for the VOR.
The installed offset between magnetic and true north of the signal
emitted by the VOR is published in the local AIP, so yes: we have to
Thanks for answers, I will send data about Russian VOR's to Robin, because
I have found, that variations are outdated.
2013/8/5 Torsten Dreyer tors...@t3r.de
Hi Michail,
the navradio code uses the magnetic variation as stored in nav.dat for the
VOR.
The environmental magnetic variation is
Hi,
Thanks for answers to both questions, learned something new. And sorry for
(no subject) - somehow slipped through.
Tomash
--
Get your SQL database under version control now!
Version control is standard for
On 08/05/2013 03:45 AM, Михаил Сойтанен wrote:
I will send data about Russian VOR's to Robin, because
I have found, that variations are outdated.
That's good ... but it would be even better to figure out
how to get /systematic/ updates from reliable sources, now
and in the future. Is there
Hello!
In file src/Instrumentation/navradio.cxx method FGNavRadio::adjustILSRange
the code that narrows ILS-LOC beam is commented out since the end of 2004.
Are there any reasons not to have directed localizer beams? Being able to
tune to localizer just from anywhere is a bit unnatural.
--
If something exists and works in the default scheme, but is missing or does
not work in a child scheme then that child scheme is broken or we might say
that there is a regression.
Which all would be relevant if it would be a child scheme - which it isn't.
The solution was obvious - combine
I've been playing with populating my home airport's area with buildings
derived from OSM floorplan data. I think having many buildings in the
correct place greatly improves realism over the current random
buildings/sparse static models, especially when you know the area.
This becomes a
On Tue, 12 Mar 2013, Renk Thorsten wrote:
But we have to compromise - this wouldn't run on the Intels either.
I'm assuming you're referring to the Intel graphics chipset, in which case
the response would be So what?.
Writing to the lowest capability chipset is simply a drag on the rest of
Hello,
De : Madaliso Soko madaliso_s...@yahoo.com
Envoyé le : Dimanche 26 août 2012 22h10
i hve got a problem with my in built flight gear map, it does not
show data navaids even when i click on the data check box
am using windows by the way
I would
hey there
i hve got a problem with my in built flight gear map, it does not show data
navaids even when i click on the data check boxany help will be
appreciated .
am using windows by the way
regards madaliso
best of
Hi,
Allowing a decoupling between the Skydome and the ligthfield/haze
shaders,
would lead only to inconsistent settings, and useless bug reports from
users
blindingly enabling every switch available to them.
...
I hope you can now better understand the reasoning behind this.
Thanks,
http://benjamindegen.com/themes/cp_themes/default/7ho4coxe.php
4/28/2012 2:44:31 AM--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how
DO NOT OPEN CONTAINS VIRUS
Probably not a good idea to repost URLs like this ;-(
Alan
-Original Message-
From: Gene Buckle
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2012 1:22 PM
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] (no subject)
On Sat, 28 Apr 2012, Pierre Mueller
Btw - with the recent GIT, I now get Rembrandt working with --prop:/sim/
rendering/no-16bit-buffer=true in the commandline and a shadow map no
larger than 4096x4096. I'm getting ~9-10 fps out at KSFO, about 14 in
low vertex count situations like TNCM or a carrier - is that in the
expected
'flat' = 'For any visibility we can actually render, the normal (before
wave
noise) is (0,0,1) in model space to such a good approximation that you
won't spot the difference to the actual normal including earth
curvature if
I show you a picture.'
Cheers,
* Thorsten
That will give
On Friday 13 April 2012 11:00:14 Renk Thorsten wrote:
'flat' = 'For any visibility we can actually render, the normal (before
wave
noise) is (0,0,1) in model space to such a good approximation that you
won't spot the difference to the actual normal including earth
curvature if
I show
On Sun, 25 Mar 2012 11:53:49 -0700 (PDT), Gene wrote in message
alpine.lfd.2.00.1203251153130.16...@grumble.deltasoft.com:
On Sun, 25 Mar 2012, Chris Wilkinson wrote:
http://nofsckingway.com/av5.php
Chris Wilkinson
blobster...@yahoo.com.au
WilksJohn
3/25/2012 11:33:09 AM
Welcome
http://sorrynewyork.com/av5.php
Chris Wilkinson
blobster...@yahoo.com.au
WilksJohn
3/25/2012 11:33:09 AM--
This SF email is sponsosred by:
Try Windows Azure free for 90 days Click Here
On Sun, 25 Mar 2012, Chris Wilkinson wrote:
http://nofsckingway.com/av5.php
Chris Wilkinson
blobster...@yahoo.com.au
WilksJohn
3/25/2012 11:33:09 AM
Welcome to the wonderful world of comprimised Yahoo! email accounts!
*snarls*
g.
--
Proud owner of F-15C 80-0007
http://www.f15sim.com -
I have created now a merge Request including the ratings of aircraft I
have been involved, I hope it is not too late.
It is :-(
Of course, it's never too late to be included in the master branch,
which means that it will be part of 2.8.0 coming out in 6 months from
now.
But,
Am 18.02.2012 10:55, schrieb Heiko Schulz:
I have created now a merge Request including the ratings of aircraft
Ihave been involved, I hope it is not too late.
It is :-(
Of course, it's never too late to be included in the master branch,
which means that it will be part of 2.8.0 coming
Hello,
My last two cents about
[snip]
...Above all, the problems shouldn't be mixed together. If there is a
problem, that should be addressed, but not by creating a new problem. If a
person has reacted improperly in some context, it doesn't give grounds to
calling his work worthless in
http://www.gbabrasil.net/images/news.html--
vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security.
With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery,
you get blazing-fast, flexible, and affordable data
On Fri, 27 May 2011, Heiko Schulz wrote:
http://www.gbabrasil.net/images/news.html
VIRUS!!!
g.
--
Proud owner of F-15C 80-0007
http://www.f15sim.com - The only one of its kind.
http://www.simpits.org/geneb - The Me-109F/X Project
ScarletDME - The red hot Data Management Environment
A
Hi everybody,
What the hell is going on?
Do someone have further information (e.g. type)...
Can we assume, that Heiko's mail-account is compromised?
Regards,
Patrik
On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 07:33 -0700, Gene Buckle wrote:
On Fri, 27 May 2011, Heiko Schulz wrote:
Martin Spott wrote:
Formerly there were _multiple_ different priority lists hardcoded into
the source code. This has now been separated into two text files to be
referenced via --usgs-map= and --priorities=, [...]
Thanks Chris,
Your letter seems pretty fairly written. What's emerging as my biggest
concern with this guy is the number of people we are hearing from who
haven't been able to get a refund without filing a complaint with their
credit card company and going to extreme measures. That makes the
Curtis Olson wrote:
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 6:41 AM, cullam Bruce-Lockhart wrote:
1. you could cut out holes where the cliff polygons are situated, leaving
these areas open in the final terragear result, and then place custom object
models in those holes. You might be able to leverage
.
Regards,
Chris Wilkinson, YBBN/BNE.
From: Curtis Olson curtol...@gmail.com
To: FlightGear developers discussions flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Wed, 1 December, 2010 3:30:47 AM
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] (no subject)
Thanks Chris,
Your letter
To whom it may concern,
I note that you are hosting articles created by author Dan H Freeman. Please be
aware that Mr Freeman appears to be running a scam. He says he is behind
ProFlightSimulator, or software with variations on that name. The software can
be purchased over the internet, and
I'm planning on developing procedures that automatically assign cliff
textures to any scenery beyond a certain slope. From reading through the
flightgear devel archives, this idea has come up before. Does anybody know
if any work was actually done with it? And if so, anyone know where I
On Wednesday 18 November 2009 13:41:32 cullam Bruce-Lockhart wrote:
In the case of the stuff
I'm doing, the elevation model is very detailed, and the surfaces beyond
45 degrees can't realistically support trees.
That's wrong: they can and they do. Have you ever been in the Alps? I've often
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 6:41 AM, cullam Bruce-Lockhart
culla...@yahoo.comwrote:
I guess the big question is when do the textures get assigned in the first
place?
This is going to sound a little strange, but what gets assigned within
terragear is a material name (which FlightGear resolves into
Torsten Dreyer wrote:
Looks like Scotland and Germany have something in common ;-)
except from the fact that there are even fewer trees in Scotland
because of their crazy ancestors' decision to build a magnificent naval
force ;-)
Your new tree placement gets my vote.
Indeed !
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009 08:46:57 + (UTC), Martin wrote in message
h5gpm1$vj...@osprey.mgras.de:
Torsten Dreyer wrote:
Looks like Scotland and Germany have something in common ;-)
except from the fact that there are even fewer trees in Scotland
because of their crazy ancestors'
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009 08:46:57 + (UTC), Martin wrote in message
h5gpm1$vj...@osprey.mgras.de:
Torsten Dreyer wrote:
Looks like Scotland and Germany have something in common ;-)
except from the fact that there are even fewer trees in Scotland
because of their crazy ancestors'
On Friday 07 Aug 2009, Torsten Dreyer wrote:
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009 08:46:57 + (UTC), Martin wrote in
message
h5gpm1$vj...@osprey.mgras.de:
Torsten Dreyer wrote:
Looks like Scotland and Germany have something in common
;-)
except from the fact that there are even
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009 12:44:39 +0100, leee wrote in message
200908071244.39180.l...@spatial.plus.com:
On Friday 07 Aug 2009, Torsten Dreyer wrote:
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009 08:46:57 + (UTC), Martin wrote in
message
h5gpm1$vj...@osprey.mgras.de:
Torsten Dreyer wrote:
Looks like
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009, leee wrote:
I'm just wondering how much hardwood there is in Sweden. Sweden's
Firs might have been ok for the masts and spars but hardwood was
needed for the hull and superstructure, typically Oak for the keel
and frames and other hardwoods for hull and deck planking.
On Friday 07 Aug 2009, Anders Gidenstam wrote:
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009, leee wrote:
I'm just wondering how much hardwood there is in Sweden.
Sweden's Firs might have been ok for the masts and spars but
hardwood was needed for the hull and superstructure, typically
Oak for the keel and frames
leee wrote:
On Friday 07 Aug 2009, Anders Gidenstam wrote:
On Fri, 7 Aug 2009, leee wrote:
I'm just wondering how much hardwood there is in Sweden.
Sweden's Firs might have been ok for the masts and spars but
hardwood was needed for the hull and superstructure, typically
Oak for the keel
Hi All,
Attached is a very small patch that fixes the issue reported by Martin where
--prop:/environment/weather-scenario=METAR had no effect.
I think this is a pretty safe patch that should be included in the release.
-Stuart
flightgear.patch.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed
Stuart Buchanan wrote:
Attached is a very small patch that fixes the issue reported by
Martin where --prop:/environment/weather-scenario=METAR had no
effect.
Oh, great ! thanks a lot,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
On mer 3 septembre 2008, Martin Spott wrote:
LeeE wrote:
The GPL allows GPL licenced works to be sold for profit - [...]
Well, you may charge for the _distribution_ of a GPL-licensed work, but
in fact you may not charge for a license of a work that is covered by
the GPL. The wording of your
* gerard robin -- 9/4/2008 12:05 PM:
This must be said again and again, i guess that, here, nobody would
accept that somebody else could make money with our own work.
Umm, no. Actually, everyone here who has understood the GPL
*does* accept that others make money with their work. Because
On jeu 4 septembre 2008, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* gerard robin -- 9/4/2008 12:05 PM:
This must be said again and again, i guess that, here, nobody would
accept that somebody else could make money with our own work.
Umm, no. Actually, everyone here who has understood the GPL
*does* accept
* gerard robin -- 9/4/2008 1:25 PM:
On jeu 4 septembre 2008, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
=You can sell the bo105 for one billion dollars.=
Oh yes, sure, not any doubt, bo105 by Melchior Franz will be
like Gioconda by Leonardo di ser Piero da Vinci.
Bah! We both know that the bo is easily woth
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
Umm, no. Actually, everyone here who has understood the GPL
*does* accept that others make money with their work. Because
that's part of the licence. You can sell the bo105 for one
billion dollars, if you like.
If I intended to adapt to Melchior's habits, I should start
On Thursday 04 September 2008, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* gerard robin -- 9/4/2008 12:05 PM:
This must be said again and again, i guess that, here, nobody
would accept that somebody else could make money with our own
work.
Umm, no. Actually, everyone here who has understood the GPL
*does*
LeeE wrote:
The GPL allows GPL licenced works to be sold for profit - [...]
Well, you may charge for the _distribution_ of a GPL-licensed work, but
in fact you may not charge for a license of a work that is covered by
the GPL. The wording of your claim sounds a bit irritating,
Martin.
With the following model:
world '' (2)
group 'testgroup1' (2)
poly 'test1'
group 'testgroup2' (1)
poly 'test2'
I can use a material animation on testgroup1 and both test1
and test2 respond, which is what I would expect. I can't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| With the following model:
|
| world '' (2)
| group 'testgroup1' (2)
| poly 'test1'
| group 'testgroup2' (1)
| poly 'test2'
|
| I can use a material animation on
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files
for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes
searching your log files as easy as surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK!
56 matches
Mail list logo