dave perry wrote:
Laurence Vanek wrote:
I believe, however, that something else is going on with the A/P during
ILS approach. I do not get the behavior you report on approach. The A/P
begins to make large over corrections about one mile out, to the point
where I need to disable the
For the upcoming release, should we select a scaling factor for the
adverse-aileron yaw in the c172p and SenecaII that result in the
performance more similar to the pa28-161 and pa24-250 respectively?
For the SenecaII: Yes.
I will work on that issue - hopefully today.
Torsten
I am forwarding an exchange from today's users list to the developers
list because it raises a significant difference between jsbsim and
yasim. These fdms treat turbulence very differently and jsbsim has a
very exaggerated adverse-aileron yaw that makes this difference fatal
for autopilot ILS
-devel] [Fwd: Re: [Flightgear-users] Seneca II -
couple of user comments]
I am forwarding an exchange from today's users list to the developers
list because it raises a significant difference between jsbsim and
yasim. These fdms treat turbulence very differently and jsbsim has a
very exaggerated
4 matches
Mail list logo