[Flightgear-devel] [Fwd: Re: [Flightgear-users] Seneca II - couple of user comments]

2007-12-04 Thread dave perry
dave perry wrote: Laurence Vanek wrote: I believe, however, that something else is going on with the A/P during ILS approach. I do not get the behavior you report on approach. The A/P begins to make large over corrections about one mile out, to the point where I need to disable the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Fwd: Re: [Flightgear-users] Seneca II - couple of user comments]

2007-12-04 Thread Torsten Dreyer
For the upcoming release, should we select a scaling factor for the adverse-aileron yaw in the c172p and SenecaII that result in the performance more similar to the pa28-161 and pa24-250 respectively? For the SenecaII: Yes. I will work on that issue - hopefully today. Torsten

[Flightgear-devel] [Fwd: Re: [Flightgear-users] Seneca II - couple of user comments]

2007-12-02 Thread dave perry
I am forwarding an exchange from today's users list to the developers list because it raises a significant difference between jsbsim and yasim. These fdms treat turbulence very differently and jsbsim has a very exaggerated adverse-aileron yaw that makes this difference fatal for autopilot ILS

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [Fwd: Re: [Flightgear-users] Seneca II - couple of user comments]

2007-12-02 Thread Jon S. Berndt
-devel] [Fwd: Re: [Flightgear-users] Seneca II - couple of user comments] I am forwarding an exchange from today's users list to the developers list because it raises a significant difference between jsbsim and yasim. These fdms treat turbulence very differently and jsbsim has a very exaggerated