Csaba Halász
On 4/12/07, Vivian Meazza wrote:
Why do you want to offset a TACAN position?
You know why: because on the carriers the tacan altitude is 100
feet. And that *is* fixed, no matter where the carrier happens to
be. It should be fixed relative to the carrier. So as
On Fri 13 April 2007 10:31, Vivian Meazza wrote:
SNIP
Yes - this is Mathias' business, I really can't comment, except to say that
I would be surprised if there were anything much wrong with his code, and
certainly not his mathematics.
Have I missed anything?
Yup - if it ain't broke don't
gh.robin wrote:
... Snip ...
Hello Vivian, Csaba
I am a TACAN user, with Tankers and Carriers, (mainly
developing French Navy
Aircraft models) i have read with interest that long conversation.
I can say, the existing TACAN system, which has been
implemented and improved
by Vivian
On 4/13/07, Vivian Meazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Exactly my point: AIBase only reads generic values. Offsets are not generic
values, and their reading should remain where they are at present. If
another AI Object comes up with a requirement, then that is a different
matter.
They are
Hello!
I have looked into tacan code when investigating a bug found by Nick.
From the one-liner fix it grew to this massive patch. Here is what I did:
Moved tacan parameters from carrier_nav.dat to the appropriate model
node in the property tree (eg. /ai/models/carrier/navaids/tacan).
Csaba Halász
Hello!
I have looked into tacan code when investigating a bug found by Nick.
From the one-liner fix it grew to this massive patch. Here is what I
did:
Moved tacan parameters from carrier_nav.dat to the
appropriate model node in the property tree (eg.
On 4/12/07, Vivian Meazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doesn't make any sense to me - what bug are you trying to fix?
None, it is already fixed. This is just a follow-up.
Why do you want to offset a TACAN position?
You know why: because on the carriers the tacan altitude is 100 feet.
And that
Csaba Halász
On 4/12/07, Vivian Meazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Doesn't make any sense to me - what bug are you trying to fix?
None, it is already fixed. This is just a follow-up.
Why do you want to offset a TACAN position?
You know why: because on the carriers the tacan altitude
On 4/13/07, Vivian Meazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Csaba Halász
On 4/12/07, Vivian Meazza [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why do you want to offset a TACAN position?
You know why: because on the carriers the tacan altitude is
100 feet. And that *is* fixed, no matter where the carrier
9 matches
Mail list logo
