On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 10:21:22 -0700, John wrote in message <4b2e5d12.1080...@av8n.com>:
> On 12/20/2009 09:15 AM, stefan riemens suggested: > > > How about making allowing one to set the proposed > > preferred-approach-deg property, but not requiring it. > > It's already not required. It has a reasonable default. > Most users will never even know it's there. > > This is in line with real-world reality. There are some > real-world pilots, including virtually all VFR pilots and > even some instrument-rated pilots, who have never heard > of reversible ILSs. ..some people will want to _change_ e.g. approach routing, into say a gliding spiral at night in the summer so people can sleep with their windows open, or some such political scenario. That means overriding whatever defaults FG got from Robin's airport feature listing, and probably close to run-time ideas like "How much noise do we make at 5.5 and 6 degree glides if we go 500 feet left and then weave back right the last mile?". We have all bits in place? -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
