Re: [Flightgear-devel] 737-300 Update!

2009-10-19 Thread Heiko Schulz
Hi, I would rather say gimped ;-) Are those pics 'shopped? They have such good contrast and stuff, I  can't believe it's FG, because it doesn't look like that on my PC :) BTW, good job, and, if you really did it, nice work on the pics too,  they look much better than the real ones ;)

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 737-300 Update!

2009-10-19 Thread Heiko Schulz
Hi, Hi, Maybe it is the video card and driver that is producing the higher quality? I have an 2 years old computer with a GeForce 8800- not the newest one. With playing with the setting I get quite good fps and qualitity. Nethertheless above Paris I have only 10fps - 3d-clouds and

[Flightgear-devel] 737-300 Update!

2009-10-18 Thread Heiko Schulz
Hi @all, Hi David, Hi Innis, Some time ago I began to model the 3d-cockpit. It was a bit much for me, so this project stalled. But for the flightdeck I had to fix the dimensions and proportions of the exterior model. The fuselage had more the length of the 737-400, the wings the span of a

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 737-300 Update!

2009-10-18 Thread Victhor Foster
Are those pics 'shopped? They have such good contrast and stuff, I can't believe it's FG, because it doesn't look like that on my PC :) BTW, good job, and, if you really did it, nice work on the pics too, they look much better than the real ones ;)

Re: [Flightgear-devel] 737-300 Update!

2009-10-18 Thread S Andreason
Hi, Maybe it is the video card and driver that is producing the higher quality? May I point out the starboard navigation light seems to be on the port wing? etc. ;P Otherwise, very nice. Stewart Victhor Foster wrote: Are those pics 'shopped? They have such good contrast and stuff, I