Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flightgear-devel Digest, Vol 33, Issue 26

2009-01-24 Thread BARANGER Emmanuel
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2009 13:23:59 +0100 From: gerard robin ghma...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Licensing and disclaimers for aircraft models To: FlightGear developers discussions flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Message-ID: 200901241323.59854.ghma...@gmail.com

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flightgear-devel Digest, Vol 33, Issue 26

2009-01-24 Thread gerard robin
On samedi 24 janvier 2009, BARANGER Emmanuel wrote: I am tired of the negative attitudes of some. Have some rest :) :):) CVS is a place of study, research, development. It is not there to the users. Please. The stable official FG contains a minimum of aircraft representing a wide

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flightgear-devel Digest, Vol 33, Issue 26

2009-01-24 Thread Martin Spott
gerard robin wrote: On samedi 24 janvier 2009, BARANGER Emmanuel wrote: I am tired of the negative attitudes of some. Have some rest :) :):) You don't do anyone a favour by belitteling Emmanuel's statement. I propose you'd better think about it, Martin. -- Unix _IS_ user

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flightgear-devel Digest, Vol 33, Issue 26

2009-01-24 Thread Curtis Olson
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Martin Spott martin.sp...@mgras.netwrote: gerard robin wrote: On samedi 24 janvier 2009, BARANGER Emmanuel wrote: I am tired of the negative attitudes of some. Have some rest :) :):) You don't do anyone a favour by belitteling Emmanuel's

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flightgear-devel Digest, Vol 33, Issue 26

2009-01-24 Thread syd adams
I am tired of the negative attitudes of some. CVS is a place of study, research, development. It is not there to the users. Please. The stable official FG contains a minimum of aircraft representing a wide diversity. That's enough. And there is no place to get lost. Those who choose to

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flightgear-devel Digest, Vol 33, Issue 26

2009-01-24 Thread gerard robin
On samedi 24 janvier 2009, syd adams wrote: Hi Emmanuel , My thoughts were to move the extra or non sellable aircraft out of cvs /data , not to erase them completely I am working on the Boeing 777 , so this issue is of some interest to me Cheers Hi, Syd don't be wrong you were

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flightgear-devel Digest, Vol 33, Issue 26

2009-01-24 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* gerard robin -- Saturday 24 January 2009: My point [...] was to remind that period when we had a specific stable aircraft directory. When was that? I'm FlightGear developer since March 2001, and in that time we never had such a directory. And at that time we only had one aircraft, so I

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flightgear-devel Digest, Vol 33, Issue 26

2009-01-24 Thread syd adams
well not if it has the word Boeing in it , if I understand correctly. But I have no objection to removing or modifying any of my aircraft if they might possibly cause problems, or don't fit the GPL licence Cheers On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 11:43 AM, Stefan Seifert n...@detonation.orgwrote: