Le 16/02/2012 23:02, flightgear-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net a
écrit :
> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 11:02:46 + (GMT) From: Heiko Schulz
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flightgear-devel
> Digest, Vol 70, Issue 9 To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Message-ID:
> <1329390166.56815.yahoomailclas...@web29504.mail.ird.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> question of you in this sentence
> So why don't you keep to your own words, and keep that away from this list?!
Simply because when I am attacked and insulted in public I have a right
of reply logic.
> From: Clement de l'Hamaide
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Fair practice& autorisations
> To:
> Message-ID:
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
>
> All people need to know that 60% (or more... it's approximate) of aircraft
> available for flightgear are created by helijah.
> More than 80% of them are totaly crappy ! They aren't a good point for
> FlightGear project !
So here is an insult to all those (and there are many) who appreciate my
work and my aircraft hangar. Who insult who ? Curt, good news for you,
the Arup S2 is a shit, as modeled by me ( dixit Cément )
> Imagines
> a man who don't know FlightGear project : he test 1, 2 ,3 aircrafts by
> helijah then he says "pfff all these aircraft are unusable. I leave
> FlightGear and I go buy MSFS !"
The last argument fashionable but totally ridiculous. Decidedly, if they
find nothing more to say it becomes ridiculous. Clement was yet well
pleased to make his work on the Dc 3 of my shed. Memory loss certainly.
Let's be clear in this case. I must model planes full, finished, perfect
etc. .
In this case the PAF Team would not exist even. Because none of them
would have wanted to improve the original Dc 3 FG. Similarly for the
Lancair, the Techman etc. ...
This is because my airplanes are available in the state, that people
flock to help. These comments are totally contradictoirs.
In this case the PAF Team would not exist even. Because none of them
would have wanted to improve the original Dc 3 FG. Similarly for the
Lancair, the Techman etc. ...
This is because my planes are available in the state that people flock
to help.
I model airplanes complet, finished, perfect etc. . and no one will
want to improve and entréer in the large family of contributors.
Otherwise this would create new aircraft, of course.
Either I continue as I did since 2006 and many other contributors appear
coming, as the PAF Team that has a very short memory as you can see.
I never refused improvements (Long Ez, Velocity XL, Carreidas 160, B25,
A26 Invader, I16, UH 1, etc. ) So stop slandering without knowing.
And it is only sad to see them continue to ridicule himself this way.
Personally, this does not prevent me from living and I especially do not
want it to anyone. Their misunderstanding is sad that's all. See so much
talent wasted by so much animosity and stupidity is just a pity
> Message: 20
> Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 19:32:49 +0100
> From: kreuzritter2000
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Flightgear-devel Digest, Vol 70, Issue
> 9
> To:flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Message-ID:<1329417169.3356.3.camel@blackbox>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> Am Donnerstag, den 16.02.2012, 00:24 +0100 schrieb BARANGER Emmanuel:
> Oh, then i misinterpreted that. Thanks for clarification.
No problem :)
>> This is the PAF team that refuses all.
> But one question, how can they refuse a commit when they are no
> maintainer of fg-data?
Disease, memory loss, madness, desire to hurt or something other I do
not know lol
Regards. Emmanuel
--
BARANGER Emmanuel
http://helijah.free.fr
http://embaranger.free.fr
--
Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but cloud computing
also focuses on allowing computing to be delivered as a service.
http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfnl/114/51521223/
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
