On 12 Sep 2011, at 18:47, Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
> May be anybody is willing to write something down in the wiki?
> I guess this googles well too ...
I've started a wiki page for Cmake, anyone can improve it, and some of the
information is already out of date as Mathias and Fred improve stuff.
On Mon, 12 Sep 2011 06:50:18 -0500
Curtis Olson wrote:
> Indeed, telling cmake you would like a release build seems to improve the
> performance of the executable dramatically. I suppose it is good to ask
> dumb questions once in a while so this basic information can get in the
> archives and be
Hi,
On Monday, September 12, 2011 13:50:18 Curtis Olson wrote:
> Indeed, telling cmake you would like a release build seems to improve the
> performance of the executable dramatically. I suppose it is good to ask
> dumb questions once in a while so this basic information can get in the
> archive
2011/9/12 Mathias Fröhlich
> I just set CC, CXX, CFLAGS, CXXFLAGS and export them.
> Then cmake just takes them. This works just the same than with automake
> too.
> At least current cmake versions behave that way. Older ones were way harder
> to
> convince that I know my cflags :)
>
> Alternative
Hi Curt, Durk,
On Monday, September 12, 2011 07:45:49 Durk Talsma wrote:
> based on my experience with building FlightGear from yesterday, I'd say
> that cmake is a great tool and most likely a step forward. But. it does
> take a little getting used to, in particular the finer details of compiler
Hi Curt,
based on my experience with building FlightGear from yesterday, I'd say that
cmake is a great tool and most likely a step forward. But. it does take a
little getting used to, in particular the finer details of compiler
optimizations, etc etc. I'll try to post my more details about my e
Curtis Olson wrote:
> I recently moved over to trying to build with cmake by default, but cmake
> hides the compile options so I honestly don't know how to even check what
> compile options I'm building with now that I switched to cmake. Can anyone
> tell me how to figure that out? Is there a det
Sometime in the last week I noticed the Flightgear frame rates on my machine
went to about 1/3 of what they were previously. I haven't worked super hard
on this, but here's what I can say.
When I fire up the Cub at --airport=KANE with clear skies I get:
v2.4 = 90 fps (bounces around a bit but us
On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 13:40:10 +0200
Tim Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> I picked 30 because I argee that anyrhing over 30 is a waste
> >> ...unless bragging about computer speed, of course, :)...
> No. Anything over the sync rate of the monitor is a waste, but there is a
> visible
> differ
On Sat, 27 Oct 2007 10:41:04 +0100
"Vivian Meazza" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Syd&Sandy
>
> > Sent: 27 October 2007 01:08
> > To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: [Flightgear-devel] frame rates...
> >
> >
>
> H
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vivian Meazza wrote:
> Syd&Sandy
>
>> Sent: 27 October 2007 01:08
>> To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: [Flightgear-devel] frame rates...
>>
>>
>> With a pending PLIB release come up .
Syd&Sandy
> Sent: 27 October 2007 01:08
> To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: [Flightgear-devel] frame rates...
>
>
> With a pending PLIB release come up
> Would now be a good to push for setting (again) ...
>
>
> 30
>
&
With a pending PLIB release come up
Would now be a good to push for setting (again) ...
30
as default in the preference file ?
I picked 30 because I argee that anyrhing over 30 is a waste ...unless bragging
about computer speed, of course, :)...
It makes autopilot behavior and t
On Fri 4 May 2007 08:52, Martin Spott wrote:
> John Wojnaroski wrote:
> > Is there any info/data on FG frame rates with OSG vis-a-vis previous
> > plib versions running on comparable hardware?
>
> The last time when I compared FlightGear with PLIB scenegraph against
> OpenSceneGraph, is several sev
John Wojnaroski wrote:
> Is there any info/data on FG frame rates with OSG vis-a-vis previous
> plib versions running on comparable hardware?
The last time when I compared FlightGear with PLIB scenegraph against
OpenSceneGraph, is several several months behind. With close to default
settings (I
Hi,
Hi,
Windows XP Nvidea GeForce 5200 ( the weakest); 512 Mb
RAM, 2.8 GHZ.
Plib: 25- 42 fps
OSG: 19-37 fps
OSG-Compilation from the 04-18-2007, used the standart
aircrafts. With the ufo I can get fps fom 42 to 51.
Much improvement since the beginning of OSG in FGFS
Seems that it is dependi
On Fri 4 May 2007 01:12, John Wojnaroski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there any info/data on FG frame rates with OSG vis-a-vis previous
> plib versions running on comparable hardware?
>
> Running with the 23 Apr release of OSG and the latest FG/SG software I'm
> seeing frame rates around 22 fps. The same c
Hi,
Is there any info/data on FG frame rates with OSG vis-a-vis previous
plib versions running on comparable hardware?
Running with the 23 Apr release of OSG and the latest FG/SG software I'm
seeing frame rates around 22 fps. The same configuration at KSFO with
plib and the 0.9.10 release pro
18 matches
Mail list logo
