Re: [Flightgear-devel] MSVC and C99

2011-01-24 Thread ThorstenB
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Olaf Flebbe wrote: > MSVC implements proper initialization of static variables. > > http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/0x80hh2d%28v=VS.90%29.aspx > > "If you do not explicitly initialize a global static variable, it is > initialized to 0 by default, and every

Re: [Flightgear-devel] MSVC and C99

2011-01-24 Thread Olaf Flebbe
Hi, MSVC implements proper initialization of static variables. http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/0x80hh2d%28v=VS.90%29.aspx "If you do not explicitly initialize a global static variable, it is initialized to 0 by default, and every member that has pointer type is assigned a null pointer.

Re: [Flightgear-devel] MSVC and C99

2011-01-24 Thread Hal V. Engel
On Monday, January 24, 2011 07:54:53 am Geoff McLane wrote: > On Sun, 2011-01-23 at 16:50 +0100, ThorstenB wrote: > > On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Geoff McLane wrote: > > And I am not so sure MSVC even zeros static variables, > > unless specifically set to NULL/0, unlike as sugg

[Flightgear-devel] MSVC and C99

2011-01-24 Thread Geoff McLane
On Sun, 2011-01-23 at 16:50 +0100, ThorstenB wrote: > On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Geoff McLane wrote: > And I am not so sure MSVC even zeros static variables, > unless specifically set to NULL/0, unlike as suggested > for gcc, thus say :- > > static ch