Hi Alasair
What is the problem with Dubbo a quick google seems to show that YSDU is
still the valid ICAO code for Dubbo and my 2.0 version shows YSDU for
Dubbo in the select airport dialog.
Cheers
Innis
For anyone working with ATC, these are further airport inconsistencies I
have found
On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 19:42 +0800, Innis Cunningham wrote:
Hi Alasair
What is the problem with Dubbo a quick google seems to show that YSDU
is
still the valid ICAO code for Dubbo and my 2.0 version shows YSDU for
Dubbo in the select airport dialog.
Cheers
Innis
In QFL.xml, flights
Hi Alasdair
Oh Ok I am not sure how that slipped through I will look at it.The best
I can suggest is for you to amend your local copy as I would not think it
will change any time soon in FG.Thanks for the heads up.
And it is nice to know someone else is using Australian traffic.
Cheers
Innis
On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 12:08 +, Alasdair wrote:
On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 19:42 +0800, Innis Cunningham wrote:
Hi Alasair
What is the problem with Dubbo a quick google seems to show that YSDU
is
still the valid ICAO code for Dubbo and my 2.0 version shows YSDU for
Dubbo in the select
Hi,
Thanks for reporting. I'll update those during my next round of revisions
(which may still take a while, as I'm still quite busy with my new job).
Cheers,
Durk
On 21 Nov 2010, at 23:05, Alasdair wrote:
On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 20:01 +0100, Csaba Halász wrote:
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 7:55
On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 2:22 PM, Durk Talsma durkt...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for reporting. I'll update those during my next round of revisions
(which may still take a while, as I'm still quite busy with my new job).
Does it cause any problems if I commit the obvious fixes to git? I
Hi Csaba,
Shouldn't be any problem. I have some tools to fetch upstream fixes and
incorporate these back into my main database (and a streamlined version of
those tools is waiting to be included into the scripts subdirectory of
FlightGear / git soon).
Cheers,
Durk
On 22 Nov 2010, at 14:47,
Traffic file MAS.xml contains fights to an airport WOMM. It is not in
apt.dat, and googling it reveals nothing. Can anyone help me identify it
or correct it?
Kind regards,
Alasdair
--
Beautiful is writing same markup.
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Alasdair ali...@btinternet.com wrote:
Traffic file MAS.xml contains fights to an airport WOMM. It is not in
apt.dat, and googling it reveals nothing. Can anyone help me identify it
or correct it?
I think flight 0180 should be from WMKK to VOMM (with a plain V,
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 7:55 PM, Alasdair ali...@btinternet.com wrote:
Could someone correct this in git, please
Done.
--
Csaba/Jester
--
Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
standards for
On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 19:51 +0100, Csaba Halász wrote:
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Csaba Halász csaba.hal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Alasdair ali...@btinternet.com wrote:
Traffic file MAS.xml contains fights to an airport WOMM. It is not in
apt.dat, and
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 7:47 PM, Csaba Halász csaba.hal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Alasdair ali...@btinternet.com wrote:
Traffic file MAS.xml contains fights to an airport WOMM. It is not in
apt.dat, and googling it reveals nothing. Can anyone help me identify it
or
On Sun, 2010-11-21 at 20:01 +0100, Csaba Halász wrote:
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 7:55 PM, Alasdair ali...@btinternet.com wrote:
Could someone correct this in git, please
Done.
For anyone working with ATC, these are further airport inconsistencies I
have found in the AI/Traffic files vs
13 matches
Mail list logo
