Hi Y'all,
One of the things that's come up in the apt.dat discussions is whether
the taxiway layouts should be pre-clipped (meaning there are no
overlapping polygons) or overlapped (meaning polygons can overlap and
there is a well-defined draw order that makes one appear on top of another).
On Wednesday 14 June 2006 16:14, bsupnik wrote:
- Pre-clipping puts more burdon on content creation tools (by requiring
them to have robust clipping to save the data) whereas not requiring
pre-clipping puts more work on data consumers.
Where are you thinking of saving the clipped data?
Back
Hi Paul,
For what it's worth, I'm leaning more and more toward overlapping, both
because of your arguments, stuff Curt's said, and just tossing the ideas
around...so this is a bit of a devil's advocate argument...
Paul Surgeon wrote:
Where are you thinking of saving the clipped data?
Back
On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 10:14:18 -0400, bsupnik wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Y'all,
One of the things that's come up in the apt.dat discussions is whether
the taxiway layouts should be pre-clipped (meaning there are no
overlapping polygons) or overlapped (meaning polygons can
4 matches
Mail list logo
