On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 17:00 -0400, Ian Duncan wrote:
> I am an avid FlightGear user and enjoy Flight Gear very much. However, I
> would like to bring something to your attention that angers me. The
> readme file for the flightgear 2.60 source code contains incorrect
> information. There are also
I am an avid FlightGear user and enjoy Flight Gear very much. However, I
would like to bring something to your attention that angers me. The
readme file for the flightgear 2.60 source code contains incorrect
information. There are also other minor issues
* There is no program called "configure"
Hello all
Is there a posting or thread about new READMEs for FlightGear and
SimGear repos I missed? Is someone working on new READMEs?
Thanks - Yves
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first wit
On Thursday 19 July 2007 15:30, Syd&Sandy wrote:
> Yes , like that :).
> I see it is in the process of being translated to English...
Though Helijah's tutorial looks exactly what has long been needed (and it
looks very good indeed), I think it would benefit hugely from an additional
section on t
On Thu, 19 Jul 2007 14:45:56 +0200
Hans Ulrich Niedermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Syd&Sandy wrote:
>
> > but I was asked on IRC to do a Blender tutorial for modelling
> > aircraft , maybe I'll direct my efforts there when I get tired of
> > updating , though I'm terrible at teaching :)
Syd&Sandy wrote:
> but I was asked on IRC to do a Blender tutorial for modelling
> aircraft , maybe I'll direct my efforts there when I get tired of
> updating , though I'm terrible at teaching :)
Something like this?
http://helijah.free.fr/flightgear/Creation/Creation-fr.htm
(AFAIK, Ti
Thanks for the input guys , sounds like a definite NO to me :) whew !
Stuart , I used Open Office to combined all the files into one then exported
it as PDF ... so it definately would be work to keep up to date but it
really was just a project to minimize the amount of applications I have
Am Mittwoch 18 Juli 2007 21:56 schrieb AnMaster:
> I'm strongly against using PDF, loading a pdf viewer takes much longer time
> and it is harder to edit *.pdf than text files. At least I got no program
> to edit *.pdf
Same here. Automatically creating PDF as an alternative nicer representation
i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I'm strongly against using PDF, loading a pdf viewer takes much longer time
and it is harder to edit *.pdf than text files. At least I got no program to
edit *.pdf
Regards
AnMaster
Syd&Sandy wrote:
> Hi all ,
> I've been consolidating all th
--- Curtis Olson wrote:
> Be aware that the master copies of all the README.xxx files come from
> the
> source tree, not the data tree. They are only replicated in the data
> tree
> for convenience.
>
> Here's my view. The README.xxx are there to collect tidbits of
> information
> not documente
Be aware that the master copies of all the README.xxx files come from the
source tree, not the data tree. They are only replicated in the data tree
for convenience.
Here's my view. The README.xxx are there to collect tidbits of information
not documented elsewhere or that didn't really fit else
Hi all ,
I've been consolidating all the README.xxx files in the Docs folder
into a single PDF file, because I prefer to be able to open ONE file and
search for what I need , and I like the word search and thumbnail views... I
haven't updated or changed any information , at the moment
12 matches
Mail list logo
