* Chris Metzler -- Wednesday 12 April 2006 04:45:
I would naively expect the angle that you give the sign to correspond to
the orientation of a normal either going out of the sign face or going
into the sign face. However, there seems to be an offset between the
angle used and the heading of
On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 12:18:13 +0200
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
* Chris Metzler -- Wednesday 12 April 2006 04:45:
I would naively expect the angle that you give the sign to correspond
to the orientation of a normal either going out of the sign face or
going into the sign face.
Oh, you are
* Chris Metzler -- Wednesday 12 April 2006 19:39:
Heh, this is embarassing. First off, [...]
No, it isn't. That's normal fgfs business. It makes sure that
rocket scientist will remain the *minimum* qualification for
fgfs developers. ;-)
m.
* Melchior FRANZ -- Tuesday 11 April 2006 18:22:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] requests a Location Sign (with contents E and M),
Er ... with contents T and B5.
Why the ugly '@' everywhere, you ask? That's to avoid clashes with glyph
names.
That way it's possible to write [EMAIL PROTECTED],Y,E,S}
I added a couple of signs at KSFO.
They might not be located according to FAA specs but it's a start. Each
signs should appear on either side of the runway/taxiway, i need to add
the one on the ther side.
It is really tedious to do by hand (ie the ufo), but here are some screenshots:
Hi Melchior. This is good stuff.
I've changed my automated script for placing the runway distance remaining
signs to use this apparatus. It works fine in principle, but I've run into
a problem (bug? dunno.).
I would naively expect the angle that you give the sign to correspond to
the
* Robicd -- Sunday 09 April 2006 22:52:
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
http://members.aon.at/mfranz/rwysigns.jpg [27 kB]
updated; shows a few new features (most people won't see a difference, though
;-)
size now: [35 kB]
TODO: add some simple hardware to the naked signs. (Box and stems.)
I
7 matches
Mail list logo
