On mar 13 novembre 2007, David Megginson wrote:
> On 12/11/2007, gerard robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > probably i misunderstood the rule, didn't you modify cvs before getting
> > decision about *what* functions need keybindings.
>
> I promised to put it back if there were objections -- there
On 12/11/2007, gerard robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> probably i misunderstood the rule, didn't you modify cvs before getting
> decision about *what* functions need keybindings.
I promised to put it back if there were objections -- there were, and
I plan to put it back, but I can't connect to
On lun 12 novembre 2007, David Megginson wrote:
> On 12/11/2007, gerard robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Do you mean wait and see ?
>
> No, just that it makes sense to decide *what* functions need
> keybindings before we decide *where* to bind them.
Oh, right ,
probably i misunderstood the r
On 12/11/2007, gerard robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you mean wait and see ?
No, just that it makes sense to decide *what* functions need
keybindings before we decide *where* to bind them. Have you had a
chance to edit the wiki page yet?
All the best,
David
-
On lun 12 novembre 2007, David Megginson wrote:
> On 12/11/2007, gerard robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Wouldn't it be better to say first which mains features will not have an
> > official KEY dedicated ?
>
> I think it's shorter to decide which ones *will* have an official key
> dedicated --
On 12/11/2007, gerard robin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wouldn't it be better to say first which mains features will not have an
> official KEY dedicated ?
I think it's shorter to decide which ones *will* have an official key
dedicated -- that's what the list is for.
All the best,
David
---
I'm probably going to get tared and feathered (or tasered?) for this, but
can
we please get an optional keyboard mapping for "Microsoft Flight simulator
converts" ? This is to lower the barrier of entry for those who know nothing
else but FS004/FSX and would like to check out FlightGear.
My first
On lun 12 novembre 2007, David Megginson wrote:
> Thanks to everyone for the suggestions so far. Just to get back on
> track, we have to start by seeing if we can come up with a short,
> priority list of stuff that's (a) applicable to most aircraft, and (b)
> important enough to have a key assignm
Thanks to everyone for the suggestions so far. Just to get back on
track, we have to start by seeing if we can come up with a short,
priority list of stuff that's (a) applicable to most aircraft, and (b)
important enough to have a key assignment. We can decide exactly what
those key assignments w
9 matches
Mail list logo
