On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 13:42:03 +0100
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
>
> * Chris Metzler -- Sunday 16 December 2007:
> > Maybe I'm missing something here [...] the reason for the new
> > scenery was that the old scenery was inconsistent with the
> > current apt.dat [...]
>
> Well, you missed the fact that it
On Dec 16, 2007 6:42 AM, Melchior FRANZ <> wrote:
> * Chris Metzler -- Sunday 16 December 2007:
> > Maybe I'm missing something here [...] the reason for the new
> > scenery was that the old scenery was inconsistent with the
> > current apt.dat [...]
>
> Well, you missed the fact that it was the s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Worse is that the lamposts look like crap during dawn and dusk, they are just
black rectangles with a white pattern on then.
Regards,
Arvid Norlander
Morten Oesterlund Joergensen wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-12-15 at 19:59 -0600, Curtis Olson wrote:
>> B
* Chris Metzler -- Sunday 16 December 2007:
> Maybe I'm missing something here [...] the reason for the new
> scenery was that the old scenery was inconsistent with the
> current apt.dat [...]
Well, you missed the fact that it was the same person who had
*caused* the inconsistency by committing ne
On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 22:51:33 -0600
Curtis Olson wrote:
>
> Personally because of how close we are to finalizing the release, I'm
> *really* tempted to revert to the older scenery, but I don't know what
> other changes have been subsequently committed to adjust for the new
> scenery.
Maybe I'm miss
Durk Talsma
> Sent: 16 December 2007 06:20
> To: FlightGear developers discussions
> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] missing fsfgdb files in base package?
>
>
> On Sunday 16 December 2007 05:51, Curtis Olson wrote:
> >
> > Perhaps a short term fix would be to
On Sunday 16 December 2007 05:51, Curtis Olson wrote:
>
> Perhaps a short term fix would be to simply move the lights so they align
> properly with the existing terminal building. An even simpler fix would be
> to temporarily remove them until after the release. I've only had a chance
> to take a
On Dec 15, 2007 8:48 PM, Morten Oesterlund Joergensen <> wrote:
> I added those lights to FlightGear Scenery Database months ago. I am not
> sure if it was legal, but I did my best to find the lights on Google
> Maps, often identified using their shadows. I then centered the view
> around each one
On Sat, 2007-12-15 at 19:59 -0600, Curtis Olson wrote:
> But now I am concerned that all these missing light models are now
> placed incorrectly around the SFO area (or at least are not aligned
> properly with the terminal building) and I'm also concerned that these
> lights are not appropriate for
I'm CC'ing the devel list on this message because Martin would like to see
more flightgear issues resolved in the open and is concerned that too many
things happen in the back channels.
The issue is that Martin's recent default scenery commits referenced several
model files that weren't in the rep
10 matches
Mail list logo
