On Sunday 23 April 2006 01:31, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Quick question. How hard (or would it be possible) to create a version
of this tool that would run locally and use a local copy of the
TerraGear work directory instead of the raw vmap0 or shapefile ...
something that a person could use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Spott schrieb:
Please enjoy the latest update to the Landcover Mapserver and the
underlying database. Visit:
http://mapserver.flightgear.org/
I just had a quick look at Munich (EDDM). Activating all layers it looks
like that the most
Paul Surgeon wrote:
On Sunday 23 April 2006 00:17, Martin Spott wrote:
Please enjoy the latest update to the Landcover Mapserver and the
underlying database. Visit:
http://mapserver.flightgear.org/
Looks excellent Martin!
Thanks ! I feel a major drwback is that the airports don't have
On Sunday 23 April 2006 12:38, Martin Spott wrote:
Paul Surgeon wrote:
On Sunday 23 April 2006 00:17, Martin Spott wrote:
Please enjoy the latest update to the Landcover Mapserver and the
underlying database. Visit:
http://mapserver.flightgear.org/
Looks excellent Martin!
Thanks
Christian Mayer wrote:
What I've seen is that there are only two road types. I think this could
be limiting in the future. (As line data can dramatically increase the
triangle count it might be necessary to switch off the smallest visible
roads.)
Yep, this a tribute we're currently paying to
Paul Surgeon wrote:
On Sunday 23 April 2006 12:38, Martin Spott wrote:
Thanks ! I feel a major drwback is that the airports don't have their
ICAO codes attached to the circles. This appears to be part of the
group of features that need special handling
Ok, I'm assuming you're pulling
On Sunday 23 April 2006 14:36, Martin Spott wrote:
The screenshot looks promising, but I guess it does not show these
yellow circles. When assigning '100 120 255' I get some blueish dots.
BTW, how does your definition of the cities-symbol look ?
SYMBOL
NAME cities-symbol
TYPE ellipse
Martin Spott wrote:
Paul Surgeon wrote:
On Sunday 23 April 2006 00:17, Martin Spott wrote:
Please enjoy the latest update to the Landcover Mapserver and the
underlying database. Visit:
http://mapserver.flightgear.org/
[...]
Thanks ! I feel a major drwback is that the airports don't have
Martin Spott wrote:
Got it, ICAO identifiery are being displayed, handling of outline
colours is being worked on,
O.k., I consider this small step as finished. This was a nice task for
refreshing my rusty Perl skills, starting to learn PHP and interfacing
both with a PostGIS-DB, always trying
Hi Martin, excellent
a couple of other observations
The ICAO selector doesn't like lower-case
The land-cover seems to be offset to the coast line (in the case of NZWN to
the south)
on the positive...its a very intuative interface and shows how much work
i've got to do to get even the
dene maxwell wrote:
a couple of other observations
The ICAO selector doesn't like lower-case
Aaah, didn't think of that because I always use upper case for ICAO
codes.
The land-cover seems to be offset to the coast line (in the case of NZWN to
the south)
This is part of a well-known
Martin Spott wrote:
Please enjoy the latest update to the Landcover Mapserver and the
underlying database. Visit:
http://mapserver.flightgear.org/
enter the ICAO identifier of your favourite airfield and explore
our landcover data. I _am_ aware of two drawbacks:
1.) There is a
Hi Curt,
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Martin Spott wrote:
Please enjoy the latest update to the Landcover Mapserver and the
underlying database. Visit:
http://mapserver.flightgear.org/
[...]
Quick question. How hard (or would it be possible) to create a version
of this tool that would run
13 matches
Mail list logo
