Re: [Flightgear-devel] Why ZERO

2004-05-13 Thread Erik Hofman
Curtis L. Olson wrote: Fortran is pretty much just like BASIC but the line numbers are optional. You can get the feel of it here: http://www.westnet.com/mirrors/99bottles/beer_d_h.html#f90 What? No entry for Nasal? Erik ___ Flightgear-devel mai

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Cygwin and OpenAL

2004-05-13 Thread Erik Hofman
Richard Bytheway wrote: I removed alut from the list of OpenAL libs and everything is working again. Does this mean that alut is not needed on cygwin systems? I certainly cannot find an alut library anywhere, only a header file. If I remember correctly some platforms have alut included in the mai

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [OT] laptops

2004-05-13 Thread Christian Mayer
Giles Robertson schrieb: By contrast, my experience with Acer laptops has not been good, but that may not be Acer's fault, due to various complicated support arrangements. The build quality on mine wasn't designed for it being humped around and used for at least 8hrs a day, though, which mine is.

[Flightgear-devel] Cygwin and OpenAL

2004-05-13 Thread Richard Bytheway
Since the addition of OpenAL I have been having sporadic success building FlightGear on Win2K and Cygwin, but I think I now have is sussed. I first tried installing the Creative OpenAL SDK, but that didn't appear to help. I installed Norman's OpenAL stuff, and things got better, I eventually go

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Why ZERO

2004-05-13 Thread Lee Elliott
On Thursday 13 May 2004 09:08, Erik Hofman wrote: > Curtis L. Olson wrote: > > Fortran is pretty much just like BASIC but the line numbers are > > optional. You can get the feel of it here: > > > >http://www.westnet.com/mirrors/99bottles/beer_d_h.html#f90 > > What? No entry for Nasal? > > Erik

RE: [Flightgear-devel] Spitfire Performance Testing

2004-05-13 Thread Vivian Meazza
Erik Hofman wrote (some time ago) > Sent: 01 May 2004 08:42 > To: FlightGear developers discussions > Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Spitfire Performance Testing > > > Vivian Meazza wrote: > > > Thanks, Eric, that link was already a primary source. It's > all coming > > together nicely. Jus

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Spitfire Performance Testing

2004-05-13 Thread Andy Ross
Vivian Meazza wrote: > As you can see, it "flies". The engine/propeller combination is > a horrid bodge in YASim. Very unrealistic performance. Looking > forward to resolving that issue. I actually thought it was resolved. Did the recent changes not work for you? I can only fix bugs that are rep

RE: [Flightgear-devel] Spitfire Performance Testing

2004-05-13 Thread Jim Wilson
Vivian Meazza said: > > > Erik Hofman wrote (some time ago) > > Sent: 01 May 2004 08:42 > > To: FlightGear developers discussions > > Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Spitfire Performance Testing > > > > > > Vivian Meazza wrote: > > > > > Thanks, Eric, that link was already a primary source. I