Re: [Flightgear-devel] C172P Panel now hacked

2004-12-19 Thread Roy Vegard Ovesen
On Sunday 19 December 2004 02:08, Dave Martin wrote: I've done most of what I intended with the 172P now except for the landing/taxi lights on the wing (I'm having to learn a lot to get something looking good). I wanted everything to 'just work' so I re-added the alpha-layers to the textures

[Flightgear-devel] OT:New autoreplay on the user list

2004-12-19 Thread Roy Vegard Ovesen
When I posted on the user list I got an automatic replay from Mark Pate today. Are anyone else getting this too? BTW: I'm still getting replays from [EMAIL PROTECTED] when posting on the user list. Curt, could you remove this user from the list? It does not seem like he is following the

[Flightgear-devel] [PATCH][RFC] c172 stall horn fix(?)

2004-12-19 Thread Melchior FRANZ
After a discussion on irc://irc.flightgear.org/#flightgear and reading an old thread http://www.google.com/search?q=+site:www.mail-archive.com+%22stall+horn I think that a patch like the following would be advisable. It turns the stall horn off on ground if all wheels are on ground and the wind

Re: [Flightgear-devel] [PATCH][RFC] c172 stall horn fix(?)

2004-12-19 Thread Erik Hofman
Melchior FRANZ wrote: After a discussion on irc://irc.flightgear.org/#flightgear and reading an old thread http://www.google.com/search?q=+site:www.mail-archive.com+%22stall+horn I think that a patch like the following would be advisable. It turns the stall horn off on ground if all wheels are on

[Flightgear-devel] fgLoadAircraft

2004-12-19 Thread Paul Surgeon
What is the status of fgLoadAircraft in aircraft.cxx? Was it ever actually used and if so what was it's functional state? At the moment it's just dead code - it's not called from anywhere. Regards Paul ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list [EMAIL

Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgLoadAircraft

2004-12-19 Thread Frederic Bouvier
Paul Surgeon a écrit : What is the status of fgLoadAircraft in aircraft.cxx? Was it ever actually used and if so what was it's functional state? At the moment it's just dead code - it's not called from anywhere. As far as I understand the source, it is bound to the load-aircraft command. So I

Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgLoadAircraft

2004-12-19 Thread Erik Hofman
Frederic Bouvier wrote: Paul Surgeon a écrit : What is the status of fgLoadAircraft in aircraft.cxx? Was it ever actually used and if so what was it's functional state? At the moment it's just dead code - it's not called from anywhere. As far as I understand the source, it is bound to the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] OT:New autoreplay on the user list

2004-12-19 Thread Lee Elliott
On Sunday 19 December 2004 11:24, Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote: When I posted on the user list I got an automatic replay from Mark Pate today. Are anyone else getting this too? BTW: I'm still getting replays from [EMAIL PROTECTED] when posting on the user list. Curt, could you remove this user

Re: [Flightgear-devel] fgLoadAircraft

2004-12-19 Thread Paul Surgeon
On Sunday, 19 December 2004 19:24, Frederic Bouvier wrote: As far as I understand the source, it is bound to the load-aircraft command. So I guess that it is intended to be called from an xml file, presumably a menu or a dialog. Thanks, I missed that part. I'll give it a whirl and see what

Re: [Flightgear-devel] My 172P work for appraisal

2004-12-19 Thread Dave Martin
On Sunday 19 Dec 2004 20:54, Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote: On Sunday 19 December 2004 19:46, Dave Martin wrote: Any feedback you can give me is greatly appreciated :-) The Compass is invisible from outside. You can fix this by adding a name tag to the part where the compass model gets included,

Re: [Flightgear-devel] My 172P work for appraisal

2004-12-19 Thread Roy Vegard Ovesen
On Sunday 19 December 2004 22:32, Dave Martin wrote: Also of note; the panel being too far out means that I've totally mucked up my geometries :-S Oh well, my own fault ;) Note that I'm talking about the 2d instrument panel that is included, _not_ the panel in the 3d model. It should be quite

RE: [Flightgear-devel] My 172P work for appraisal

2004-12-19 Thread Jon Berndt
Screen shot? :-) Jon If you'd like to try the c172p you can grab it here: http://www.cyfinity.com/fgfs/c172p.tar.gz (extract in your /data/Aircraft folder but back-up your existing 172p first! ;) ) Any feedback you can give me is greatly appreciated :-)

[Flightgear-devel] Kim Kommando

2004-12-19 Thread Curtis L. Olson
In case anyone is interested, FlightGear was listed as Kim Kommando's cool site of the day in her weekly newsletter. This generated about 10x the normal traffic our web site gets and a *ton* of people downloading and trying FlightGear. We might want to keep our eyes open for new users on the

Re: [Flightgear-devel] My 172P work for appraisal

2004-12-19 Thread Dave Martin
On Sunday 19 Dec 2004 21:36, Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote: On Sunday 19 December 2004 22:32, Dave Martin wrote: Also of note; the panel being too far out means that I've totally mucked up my geometries :-S Oh well, my own fault ;) Note that I'm talking about the 2d instrument panel that is

Re: [Flightgear-devel] My 172P work for appraisal

2004-12-19 Thread Dave Martin
On Sunday 19 Dec 2004 22:03, Jon Berndt wrote: Screen shot? :-) Jon Here we are: (screenshots) http://www.cyfinity.com/fgfs/c172p1.jpg http://www.cyfinity.com/fgfs/c172p2.jpg http://www.cyfinity.com/fgfs/c172p3.jpg http://www.cyfinity.com/fgfs/c172p4.jpg

Re: [Flightgear-devel] My 172P work for appraisal

2004-12-19 Thread Dave Martin
On Sunday 19 Dec 2004 21:36, Roy Vegard Ovesen wrote: On Sunday 19 December 2004 22:32, Dave Martin wrote: Also of note; the panel being too far out means that I've totally mucked up my geometries :-S Oh well, my own fault ;) Note that I'm talking about the 2d instrument panel that is

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Kim Kommando

2004-12-19 Thread Arnt Karlsen
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 16:07:33 -0600, Curtis wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: In case anyone is interested, FlightGear was listed as Kim Kommando's cool site of the day in her weekly newsletter. This generated about 10x the normal traffic our web site gets and a *ton* of people

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Kim Kommando

2004-12-19 Thread Dave Martin
On Sunday 19 Dec 2004 22:40, Arnt Karlsen wrote: On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 16:07:33 -0600, Curtis wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]: In case anyone is interested, FlightGear was listed as Kim Kommando's cool site of the day in her weekly newsletter. This generated about 10x the normal traffic

RE: [Flightgear-devel] My 172P work for appraisal

2004-12-19 Thread Jon Berndt
Pretty! Jon -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave Martin Sent: Sunday, December 19, 2004 5:03 PM To: FlightGear developers discussions Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] My 172P work for appraisal On Sunday 19 Dec 2004 22:03, Jon

[Flightgear-devel] Software Patents.

2004-12-19 Thread Dave Martin
Many of you are probably aware that the EU Council is trying to press through a draconian directive on EU software patents on Tuesday during a meeting of the Agriculture and Fisheries commision of all things. Anyway - I just received from the FFII: Dear FFII supporter [1], Please help us

Re: [Flightgear-devel] My 172P work for appraisal

2004-12-19 Thread Ampere K. Hardraade
That will be nice. Ampere On December 19, 2004 05:03 pm, Jon Berndt wrote: Screen shot? :-) Jon If you'd like to try the c172p you can grab it here: http://www.cyfinity.com/fgfs/c172p.tar.gz (extract in your /data/Aircraft folder but back-up your existing 172p first! ;) ) Any

[Flightgear-devel] Re: CVS error msg

2004-12-19 Thread John Wojnaroski
Curtis L. Olson wrote: John Wojnaroski wrote: Hi Curtis, When you have a moment. I may have sent this to you yesterday from one of my other machines, but can't find a copy. If a dup, my apologies. In file included from ../../src/Cockpit/panel.hxx:50, from