Greetings,
My name is Wing Lui. My team and I are working on a project to create
a glass cocket instrumentation for Embraer regional jet using OpenGC
(based on version 0.54). We've been having trouble trying to get
FlightGear to send data to OpenGC. We saw the thread about
opengc_data.hxx
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Hi Harald,
Your screen shots look really nice. Are you using some sort of
imposter technique? If you have something workable, please feel free
to send early versions to Erik or I for inclusion in CVS. I'm sure
there are plenty of others who'd love to play with these.
Vivian Meazza wrote:
The attached diff models the output of a gear-driven
supercharger. I've used a 3rd order polynomial which matches the few
examples I have been able to find, giving near-linear output up to the
max-power rpm of the engine, with a little tail-off below this point,
and a
OK, I *finally* got the last of the (known) bugs fixed over the
weekend, so it's time to make a new Nasal release. Enough has changed
(all the advertised features are now present and working) that I think
this will be a 1.0 release.
I'm not finished doing the documentation and website work for
I wrote:
Here's a quick overview of the changes (or at least all of the ones
I can remember at the moment):
Yup, forgot one:
The C syntax for conditional expressions (A ? B : C) now works in
Nasal like you expect. This is 100% identical to writing
if(A){B}else{C}, and I had originally planned
Hi Wing,
I had nearly the same problem, but since I was unable to recompile
Flightgear, I copied the FlightGear's opengc_data.hxx over the OpenGC's
one and it worked fine. I also made some changes to some minor parts to
render the values properly (MAG heading,and altitude). OpenGC converts
MAG
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 17:06:11 -0400, Chris wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
So I guess you'll be working on getting a GPL'd, general-use option
available.
..not yet, I'm scheeming a renderfarm stunt; some new 2'nd hand HW shop
here says they got 200 Celeron 850's handy, so that got me
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 17:06:11 -0400, Chris wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
So I guess you'll be working on getting a GPL'd, general-use option
available.
..not yet, I'm scheeming a renderfarm stunt; some new 2'nd hand HW shop
here says they got 200 Celeron 850's
Andy Ross a écrit :
Scream really loudly if something breaks and you want this patch reverted.
I don't really want to see this patch reverted, but here is my first
experience with MSVC.
1. empty struct member ( ;; ) seems to be disallowed. So I changed :
--- data.h18 Apr 2005 19:48:47
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
2. MSVC use file extensions to choose the right language to
compile. So in misc.c the syntax of C not C++ apply. This file
should definitively be named misc.cxx, like lib.c should be lib.cxx.
Definitely not. I promise you that it's a C file. The only C99
feature that
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 17:06:11 -0400, Chris wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
So I guess you'll be working on getting a GPL'd, general-use option
available.
..not yet, I'm scheeming a renderfarm stunt; some new 2'nd hand HW shop
here says they got
I wrote:
4. I have a warning on a non standard extension used on
naRef array[];
This one is new, but I honestly thought it was a standard C89 feature.
Can you post the warning? Or is there a #pragma I can use to turn it
off?
I just looked it up. This one is actually a C99 feature, not
Andy Ross wrote:
Vivian Meazza wrote:
The attached diff models the output of a gear-driven
supercharger. I've used a 3rd order polynomial which matches the few
examples I have been able to find, giving near-linear output up to the
max-power rpm of the engine, with a little tail-off below
On Mon, 18 Apr 2005 18:10:54 -0400, Josh wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Sun, 17 Apr 2005 17:06:11 -0400, Chris wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
So I guess you'll be working on getting a GPL'd, general-use
option
14 matches
Mail list logo
