I can reproduce a segfault, which I have traced with gdb, but at this point I
am well out of my depth. Session transcript follows:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Main]$ gdb ./fgfs
(gdb) run --fg-root=/usr/local/FlightGear-0.9 --control=joystick
--enable-fullscreen
{FlightGear starts perfectly and goes on
On Thursday 06 Nov 2003 9:10 am, Norman Vine wrote:
John Barrett writes:
primary goal: blow them outa the sky !!
FWIW Historicaly FlightGear has resisted being a Military SIM.
actually resisted is not a strong enough word
What I value about FlightGear is that it attempts to *simulate* the
On Thursday 06 Nov 2003 1:05 pm, David Luff wrote:
The very very latest CVS (not the 0.9.3 release) can generate some
situation-relevant messages from the tower to the user - if you'd like to
participate in the ATC development then just shout, there's plenty to do!
David - I was so enthused
On Thursday 06 Nov 2003 8:13 pm, David Luff wrote:
Jonathan Richards writes:
I loaded up all the /ATC/*.cxx files into KDevelop this morning to see if
I could understand how it all fits together, but rapidly got lost in the
detail. Have you got a paragraph or two to hand which describes
On Tuesday 11 Nov 2003 10:07 am, Martin Spott wrote:
Although I dislike to see combat features in FlightGear I must admit
that it's quite some fun to fly these birds - there are no civilian
equivalents with that much power and speed
At least, now that the Concorde fleet is retired. Alpha
On Wednesday 12 Nov 2003 12:24 am, Phil Spurr wrote:
Hi all
I've recently (with help from Curt) managed to download and run the Win32
binaries and have been very impressed with all of your work in creating
Flightgear.
I would like to become involved with the project, but I'm looking at using
On Wednesday 12 Nov 2003 1:22 am, David Megginson wrote:
There are raw, scanned sectionals and terminal charts available
online. I haven't downloaded and unpacked the zipfiles yet, so I'm
not sure of the format.
Sectionals, at 1:500,000 scale, are the most commonly-used charts for
VFR
On Wednesday 12 Nov 2003 12:10 pm, Jonathan Richards wrote:
Frustratingly, I can't get the geotiff packages to install.
snip
Anyone know how to unstick this? geotiff gives us a tool to read the tags
in the TIFF files.
Sorry to follow up my own post. I gave up on the rpm packages and tried
On Saturday 15 Nov 2003 9:24 pm, Paul Surgeon wrote:
FlightGear would need several changes in various areas to support things
like water landings.
Firstly we would need to be able to specify various ground types.
One way of doing this is to have a number attached to each polygon in the
On Wednesday 26 Nov 2003 10:38 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lee Elliott worte:
You said If anyone has any requests I'd be happy to add them or move
them up the list. :)
Not an RAF field but I've noticed that London Stanstead (EGSS) appears to
have been sunk about 50ft into the
On Thursday 27 Nov 2003 5:23 am, JD Fenech wrote:
Not too shabby, but it probably has holes. I do know that the last time
I checked, FG will display the sun at midnight, especially if you fly up
high enough, even if the earth is actually in the way, as in directly in
the way.
The diagram
On Wednesday 26 Nov 2003 7:51 pm, Major A wrote:
Hi guys,
We've just had a really lucky day in Bristol today, as far as weather
goes. There were some dark clouds in the West, I think we wouldn't
have seen much of Concorde's last flight if it had been half an hour
earlier or later!
Anyway,
On Thursday 27 Nov 2003 9:47 am, Erik Hofman wrote:
Yeah, but then you'd get a fight over which flag is put in first and
which flag is shows just for 0.1 usec (e.g. the last flag) ...
Outside NATO HQ in Brussels, the flags are in alphabetical order of national
name. English name, though, so
On Sunday 30 Nov 2003 9:43 am, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
I don't know where on earth you can see sky so blue without colour
enhancer on your camera (polarizer or blue filter), especially
when looking at the sun.
EGTP = Perranporth 50.331585 deg N 5.177602 deg W!
On Tuesday 09 Dec 2003 9:37 pm, Norman Vine wrote:
http://perthon.sourceforge.net/
:-)
Interesting - I don't often see two (purportedly) equivalent pieces of code
together like that. I put both examples into files: the python is 668 bytes,
whereas the perl is 1074. Is python really that
On Friday 12 Dec 2003 4:42 am, Alan King wrote:
Jon Berndt wrote:
I can't find it.
You might need to register with O'Reilly to see the article.
Jon
Nah it works for me, but I also looked past it at first. Just say
'It's in the three ad's at the top of the text, right one. Looks
some people.
Thanks!
Curt.
Regards
Jonathan Richards
(nearer to EG03 than EGLL, but that's not a problem!)
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
On Thursday 05 Feb 2004 9:06 am, Erik Hofman wrote:
Luca Masera wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm using FlightGear and I've seen the realistic scenery that could be
used.
snip
The scenery you have seen was probably derived from a commercially
available satellite image CD-ROM set of the UK. I'm
On Thursday 12 Feb 2004 5:31 pm, David Luff wrote:
OK, here's some instructions on how to generate new ATC voices for
FlightGear. Hopefully this will make some sense to somebody, ask if it's
unclear.
snip
Two files are required for each voice - a wave file containing the actual
sounds, and
On Saturday 14 Feb 2004 6:27 pm, Norman Vine wrote:
snip
AFAIK
In most systems if an object is represented by a point location it is
expected that said location will be 'near' the center of the object in
question.
In the case of radar the center point of the 'target's on-screen echo' when
On Wednesday 18 Feb 2004 7:55 pm, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Hi, quick announcement ... baby! Amelia Esther, 8lbs 1oz, born 6:12am this
morning, less than 1 hour from first contraction to delivery. 12 minutes
from arrival at the hospital to delivery. Everyone is doing good. I'll be
pretty much
On Monday 23 Feb 2004 3:34 pm, Martin Spott wrote:
Hello, I've assembled a 'small' (40 MByte) FlightGear package and
included a README:
This is a subset of the FlightGear Open Source flight simulator,
packaged together with the purpose to serve as a specific benchmarking
tool among different
On Wed, 24 Mar 2004 01:27:58 +0100,
Arnt Karlsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
snip
..uh-oh, http://cloudcaptech.com/download/FlightGear/0.9.2/ means they
_distribute_, no? AFAICT, they need to put the FG sources somewhere
like http://cloudcaptech.com/download/FlightGear/0.9.2/source/ too, to
On Monday 29 Mar 2004 10:18 pm, Jon Berndt wrote:
But what on earth is an Open
Source Space Symposium?
A meeting that wishes it wasn't?
J.
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Monday 23 Feb 2004 3:34 pm, Martin Spott wrote: [on release of 0.0.1]
Hello, I've assembled a 'small' (40 MByte) FlightGear package and
included a README:
This is a subset of the FlightGear Open Source flight simulator,
packaged together with the purpose to serve as a specific benchmarking
On Thursday 01 Apr 2004 2:42 pm, Marcio Shimoda wrote:
Hi!
After few seconds of flight, I crashed the airplane (c172-3d). Then I did
reset FG, but when it restarted, the airplane appeared upside-down and
pointed to the end of track. Somebody has the same problem?
Marcio
Yes, I do. It's not
On Thursday 01 Apr 2004 8:38 pm, Jim Wilson wrote:
Jonathan Richards said:
On Thursday 01 Apr 2004 2:42 pm, Marcio Shimoda wrote:
Hi!
After few seconds of flight, I crashed the airplane (c172-3d). Then I
did reset FG, but when it restarted, the airplane appeared upside-down
On Wednesday 31 Mar 2004 11:09 am, Vivian Meazza wrote:
snip
I now have the Spitfire IIa model well underway. I have all the drawings
and data I need (far too much probably). I've rather lost the bubble on the
recent changes to the piston engine simulation in YASim:
Vivian
The pictures here
On Friday 02 Apr 2004 2:23 pm, David Culp wrote:
Earlier we had a report of a reset issue on the list. It appears that
the problem only affects a couple JSBSim aircraft...the c172 (all of
them) and the 737. Everything else seems to trim fine.
I don't use the reset feature, but I just
On Tuesday 06 Apr 2004 3:22 am, Lee Elliott wrote:
snip
* Curtis L. Olson -- Monday 05 April 2004 04:55:
Could you send me an example or two or three of airports that are
especially glaringly wrong? I hope to dig into this problem in the
upcoming week to see if I can get to the bottom
On Wednesday 07 Apr 2004 7:40 pm, Jon S Berndt wrote:
I'm trying to build an application in gnu fortran (g77) but I end up
with these link errors:
/usr/bin/../lib/libg2c.a(fmtlib.o)(.text+0x57):fmtlib.c: undefined
reference to `__umoddi3'
I'm trying to experiment with alternative terrain textures for the scenery
which I have built for the UK, but which looks odd when it's painted to look
like an irrigated American prairie :¬)
I took a look at $FG_ROOT/materials.xml, which defines how the materials are
put together, and
On Friday 09 Apr 2004 6:46 am, Jorge Van Hemelryck wrote:
On Fri, 9 Apr 2004 04:37:30 +0200
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..you wrote it, rip it apart and see if _some_ things _can_ be GPL'ed.
Actually, I didn't write the HUD code. This code already existed when I
started working on the project.
On Friday 09 Apr 2004 8:46 am, Durk Talsma wrote:
That's interesting: Does anybody know how I turn off the AI traffic (other
that hacking the code). I tried browsing the commandline options but
couldn't find one there.
It's an option from the FlightGear menu ATC/AI. I'm afraid I have to do
On Tuesday 13 Apr 2004 12:45 am, Olivier Soussiel wrote:
Does someone already fly with Flight Gear?
snip
Flying in real IMC with a synthetic VFR environment could then dramatically
increases situation awareness.
Olivier
You mean flying with FlightGear, as in off the ground, right? The
On Thursday 22 Apr 2004 8:39 pm, Chris Horler wrote:
Martin wrote:
Curt wrote:
I'm looking forward to the report. :-)
Jon,
Does the patch work? Or require a bit of modification?
Maybe we might have to wait if Jonathon hasn't yet sent it.
Cheers,
Sorry, guys, I'm a bit behind the curve;
On Thursday 22 Apr 2004 5:43 am, Jon Berndt wrote:
You've seen those hydraulically actuated little simulator rides? Forget
that, here's a bigger one:
http://tinyurl.com/2oxzd
See that? That's coming to next year's Linux Expo, that is!
We can dream, I suppose...
J.
On Friday 23 Apr 2004 1:22 pm, Richard Bytheway wrote:
You can find my pictures at http://photos.stockill.org.uk/ludex2004
I have to ask, what is img_0006.jpg (Captioned It's evil but it might
just work.)?
Richard
It's the arrangement of two potentiometers at right angles that we
On Friday 23 Apr 2004 4:11 pm, Vivian Meazza wrote:
Jon Stockill wrote
snip
They were particularly impressed
with the Seahawk and hunter models, so if Vivian wants to do
a Seafire version of his spitfire model I'm sure they'd be
happy to supply some information.
The thought had crossed
On Friday 23 Apr 2004 5:24 pm, Vivian Meazza wrote:
Jonathan Richards
snip
I'm prepared to write to the Battle of Britain Memorial Flight
[1] and ask them for information.
snip
I think that would be a very good idea. I think I have evolved a pretty
good idea of what it did from various
On Thursday 13 May 2004 12:51 am, Bruce Finney wrote:
Andy Ross wrote:
stuff cut
the way software systems are expected to act. Real Programmers count
from zero. Always have, always will.
NOTE: FORTRAN programmers count from 1, always have, always will!!!
...and APL
On Thursday 13 May 2004 12:57 am, David Megginson wrote:
Bruce Finney wrote:
the way software systems are expected to act. Real Programmers count
from zero. Always have, always will.
NOTE: FORTRAN programmers count from 1, always have, always will!!!
Does that apply to both of
I'm getting a segfault in a newly-compiled-from-cvs FlightGear:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] jonathan]$ ls ~/.fgfsrc
ls: /home/jonathan/.fgfsrc: No such file or directory
[EMAIL PROTECTED] jonathan]$ fgfs --log-level=bulk
yadda yadda
Looking for bindings for joystick Saitek Saitek X45
cut
Trying Saitek
On Wednesday 28 Apr 2004 9:30 pm, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
Try this (sent to Erik already)
snip
That got it! Thanks for the quick response!
Regards
Jonathan
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Firstly, can I say that with OpenAL, and Erik's tip for .openalrc I get much
better sound quality from a SoundBlaster Live! and a 5.1 speaker setup.
However, if I exchange frequencies on com1, and then swap them back again, I
get a segmentation fault. I know Dave Luff reported a problem with
On Wednesday 28 Apr 2004 9:00 pm, David Luff wrote:
Jonathan Richards writes:
However, if I exchange frequencies on com1, and then swap them back
again, I get a segmentation fault. I know Dave Luff reported a problem
with ATIS, but I understood that Curt had submitted a fix. This seems
On Thursday 29 Apr 2004 6:40 am, Martin Spott wrote:
I _strongly_ support Arnt's idea of 3D coordinates for the sound/noise
sources. To complete the picture I'd suggest binding the listener's ear
positions to the view direction (implemented somewhere in the viewer
mechanics in order to make it
On Monday 26 Apr 2004 5:39 pm, Curtis L. Olson wrote, among other things:
There is a *lot* of things going on with the FlightGear project at
various levels and it would be nice to have a monthly or quarterly
summary in newsletter form for ourselves too.
I've volunteered to help John
On Sun May 2 11:08:06 CDT 2004, Jon Berndt jsb at hal-pc.org wrote:
snip
FlightBeer. A just reward. :-)
Hmm. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3286049.stm refers, I think :¬)
Nonetheless, your entry is in the hat; multiple tries are allowed!
I thought things were a bit quiet through the day,
On Thursday 20 May 2004 8:48 pm, Chris Metzler wrote:
On Thu, 20 May 2004 15:34:02 -0400
David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip If
anyone one the list has the IP address 24.214.247.18 right now and is
unfortunate enough to use Windows and Outlook, please disconnect your
ethernet
50 matches
Mail list logo
