The SGI-based developers of FlightGear might be interested in this ...
If we submit a team entry, do we all get free passes to the conference ? 8-)
We all get an Octane2
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
Hi Erik (and others),
I'd just have a try - maybe you have an idea. I'm doing some simple tests to
get an OpenGL app running on Linux to display on my IRIX machine at home.
So I'm opening Xsgi with 'xhost +' and setting the approriate DISPLAY
variable on the client.
Several OpenGL test programs
Hi Curt,
[...] I don't think the two glx
implimentations are identical enough, and it may be that flightgear is
doing something too complex for the sgi glx protocol to handle?
Hmmm, I thought XFree86's GLX implementation was donated by SGI - or am I
missing something ?
[...] So I think you
Alex Perry writes:
1. NV clients don't work with any non NV display, or with a remote NV
display.
2. A Utah display will not accept a non-Utah client for texturing.
NV means NVidia and Utah points to Utah-GLX ?
As I don't have and never had any Nvidia hardware the first point should not
be
Please let me know the interest from your group and if there is anyone
interested in attending. It may be hard to have your participation without
an attendee.
If everything fails I'd consider having a nice trip to the USA - although
it's not not my primary desire, because I'm quite busy
Hello, has anyone of you experienced the the nice featured sky you can see
on this Image using an ATI Radeon AGP with XFree86-4.1.0 ?!
http://document.ihg.uni-duisburg.de/FGFS/fgfs-sky.jpeg
This seems to be specific to the Radeon driver - an Xpert-2000 AGP oder 3dfx
Voodoo3 PCI display quite
[...] The hard part will be
finding the data for the ancient runway locations. Anyone?
Hmmm, I'd like to second that. Since last summer I'm looking for precise
data on an unused NATO airbase in France: Chambley AB, ICAO: FX01
There's a small map but I'm not shure if this is sufficient for a
Is there any open source driver project that support Nvidia architecture ?
No, not with OpenGL/DRI. Try ATI Radeon instead (except 8500),
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
Well, the modern SGIs shouldn't have trouble running a recent version of
FGFS. So we run on a SGI.
Yep, as long as you have lots of CPU cycles. I believe an R10k at 300 MHz is
minimum, also a MaxImpact/MXI graphics subsystem with maximum TRAM should be
recommended.
PS: Is there a way to
Hi. I'm a Linux newbie trying to compile FlightGear on SuSE 7.2. =
Please excuse what is probably a dumb predicament.
I got the out-of-date version of FlightGear that came with SuSE to run =
properly by running SaX2 to Load 3D modules (RPM packages NVIDIA_GLX and =
NVIDIA_kernel). [...]
On Mon, Feb 04, 2002 at 11:42:02AM -0500, Bays, Lance V wrote:
[...] Are the files you mentioned already resident
on my installation, or are they on one of the SuSE installation CD's?
I don't know - but you might use 'rpm' to find out. This might looke
somewhat like this (whis is my
Hello, I didn't succeed in using a UIUC model in recent CVS. I know that
notation of '--aircraft' has changed in some way but I can't find any way to
activate my beloved Marchetti S-211. Is this still usuable ?
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are
fgfs --fdm=larcsim --aero=uiuc \
^
This one is new to me as it was not necessary in 0.7.8. The rest was already
known to me - I read about the aircraft/aero change and the directory path
has been there as long as I know FlightGear.
Thanks alot,
Martin.
--
Unix
For those of you still using UIUC models, the command-line (and
property) usage has changed in this morning's CVS. The aircraft-dir
is now relative to $FG_ROOT, so the full command line is like this:
fgfs --fdm=larcsim --aero=uiuc --aircraft-dir=Aircraft-uiuc/F104
Woahaaa, _this_ is
Contributions for the other init files are very welcome.
When adapting the Beech99 init file for the Marchetti i encountered that
there appears no real standard on where the panel files do ahve to reside.
C310 panel resides in Aircraft/c310, C182 panel resides in
Aircraft/c182/Panels - and it
[...] I've been floating a couple ideas with John 'offline' but I
think we will hold off on making any changes until after 0.7.9 so we
can have a bit more discussion and thought about exactly what we want
to do.
Thanks for the explanation,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's
[... jon wrote ]
Correct. I intended the directory and all references to be small case:
x24b
The same with X15 ?
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--
I've made prelease tarballs of SimGear-0.0.17 and FlightGear-0.7.9 and
put them on the ftp server:
The best FlightGear I've ever seen. I'm still hunting for bugs that I knew
from previous releases and CVS checkouts (falling down on runways on startup
etc.). Even effects similar to this one:
From: Jim Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
Melchior FRANZ [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Sorry from this strange heading - as I'm reading this list from my news
server I am posting from 'tin'
You don't need high speed to crash the c310 instantly. Just push the
nose down. And I don't agree that
Erik,
I've uploaded a pre-release version of FlightGear 0.7.9 at:
did you notice that you put the old 0.7.7 binary into that package ? 'inst'
complains about installing an older package as the one already installed,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its
Some time ago a big company, which shall remain nameless, bought
3dfx. They have now opted to yank the 3dfx site, and all support for
old cards with it. (That alone is reason enough not to buy their
cards.)
Yes, I wish there was more choice in the 3d graphics world. You could
always try
Uck, I must have changed the version behaviour. I'll make sure it will
work for the official release.
Where will you place the final version ? Will you update your FlightGear web
page http://www.a1.nl/~ehofman/fgfs/ so we can point to it ? I'd like to
update the comments on IRIX in the
As long as we're clearing up odds and ends, should we have COM1
default to 118.85 for KSFO ATIS in 0.7.9? That means that the sim
will start with the ATIS text scrolling across the top of the screen,
but users might not know how to get rid of it.
I dislike it, because it appears to eat
Michael and Martin have sent me an updated version of the Installation
and Getting Started Guide:
http://www.flightgear.org/Docs/
Thanks for the kind announcement. The 'European' website mirror - I believe
it's the only one around here :-) - is up to date. You might want to read
it
The HTML versions on the website are trying to load non-existent CSS
files (getstart.css FGShortRef.css). NS4 won't even show the page
without the CSS files in place. :-/
Hmmm, I can't confirm this - just had a test with Netscape-4.78 on Linux,
with and without enabling style sheets in the
So it appears that at least for KMYF, JSBSim and FlightGear are having
a very strong disagreement over the elevation of the ground, and
neither is willing to budge. Sounds like two typical flightgear
developers. :-)
Yep :-) This is _very_ similar to what I've been experiencing with 0.7.8
Ok, web and ftp should be all updated. 0.7.9 should be all there.
German mirror ist updating at the moment and will be ready until bandwidth
permits. Curt, in 'netstat' this will show up as 134.91.82.3.
whew I think I'm going to go take a week's vacation now. :-)
I'm gonna have a beer first
Right now on the FlightGear downloads page we have ready to run
binaries for Windows, Mac OS X, Debian, and Sgi.
I'm just trying to find out how to get some official blessing for a SuSE
package that I plan to build,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its
dyld: ./fgfs-0.7.9-02.16.02 can't open library:
/usr/X11R6/lib/libXmu.6.dylib (No such file or directory, errno = 2)
Since I am missing the entire X11R6 directory, I assume that I need to
load Xfree86?
Yes, from a UNIX point of view you do,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's
That is quite impressive!
Indeed !
Vertex smoothing and transparent windows would be great...
Until now it's got a transparent a**, eh, tail ;-))
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
From: Alex Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
8MB + AGP in a RagePro chipset
UTAH-Glx ? I wonder how you would get RagePro running with plain
XFree86/DRI ?
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
When using the provided 'autogen.sh' to configure the CVS source tree (on
SuSE-7.3), then I see the following (at the moment configuring SimGear
sources:
Host info: Linux i686
automake: 1.4-p5 (14)
Running aclocal
[...]
Running autoconf
configure.in:21: error: possibly undefined macro:
Hello,
I'd like to put some comments into the ~/.fgfsrc file. But when I write:
--airport-id=CYVK # Vernon
then the string # Vernon gets interpreted, too and I'm sitting on an
airfiled I've never seen before. Is it possible to extend the parser to
allow such notation ?
Thanks,
athlon is good but what about stability?
Unfortunately I never hat an Athlon SMP system in my hands to try out.
Athlon UP is pretty nice and stable,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
I had some tests with 0.7.9 source and today's CVS (_very_ nice panel), with
0.7.9 base package and today's CVS, I tried different airports but the
'feature' is still there: Several models tend to bank to the left when the
stick is in the middle:
c172-larcsim does not
c172 does
c182 does
c310
From: Alex Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is this a 'feature' or is this a bug ? This 'feature' is rather new to me,
Feature. Perhaps implemented incorrectly. Perhaps not.
On the ones that pull to the left, it's a feature.
On the ones that don't, yet, it's a bug. Does that help ?
Sort of ;-)
I
So, something seems to go wrong here. I recall a discussion on crash issues
on airports other than KSFO on the list, but thought that would have been
solved. I talked to Martion Spott, and he at least confirmed the problem
with the Cessna in LOWI.
With c172 to be precise. c310 doesn'n crash,
3. However, Start at Innsbruck LOWI gave me an immediate crash, too.
OK. Has the NTSB been called to the scene[s], yet?
They are not responsible for accidents on European territory ;-)
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
The down side of this is that with the monitoring tools our network
admins have, we are most definitely no longer under the radar screen.
In fact the network traffic to/from the flightgear server dwarfs the
traffic for any other machine here in the department.
Oh, I know what you're talking
#define SERV_HOST_ADDR your_NIC_address for the machine running fgfs.
As I see it, I've to hard code the NIC at build time, right? This might be
a pity for people like me sitting on a (home) network with dynamically
assigned addresses (DHCP).
The address of your loopback interface should
I've built
ftp://ftp.uni-duisburg.de/FlightGear/Aircraft/marchetti-uiuc-set.xml
Fortunately this is really simple. But it does not recognize the
position
altitude-ft1500/altitude-ft
/position
statement. Wht I start at KSFO i'm still sitting on the ground. Anything
wrong out there ?
JSBSim has an on-ground trimming routine. Try also setting the
velocity to non-zero.
The file I put on the ftp server is called marchetti-uiuc-set.xml and looks
like this:
?xml version=1.0?
!--
UIUC Marchetti S.211 init
And just for fun, here's an elevator trim tab that's been ripped off at
the Reno air races (looks like a modified P-51D):
I read an article about this one: 3500 HP and Vmax of approx. mach 0.82
Not bad for a propeller driven plane,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just
Does all this animation work w/ the LaRCsim and UIUC code? I have a
feeling 'yes', but we're still running 0.7.8.
Your feeling's right,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
Also I read about special nvidia extension NV_point_sprite to work with
light points it can help with this
To be honest: You _don't_ mean this, do you !?
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
Hi, would anyone mind including
ftp://ftp.uni-duisburg.de/FlightGear/Aircraft/marchetti-uiuc-set.xml
into the base package ?
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--
[... Tony wrote ...]:
OK, after discovering that my original implementation was horribly
buggy, I have now committed a better version of the normalized control
surface position code to JSBSim and FG cvs. There is a new set of
properties for these:
/surface-positions/flap-pos-pct
[...]
Hmmm,
If anyone wants to take a look at the runway lighting work I've done
so far here's what you need to do:
Wow, this is _very_ nice, indeed. I have to admit that I'm waiting for this
a long time. For me it does not matter that much if the layout is really
exact - I'm happy as long as I have a
Where's this autopilot-devel list you're talking about?
http://autopilot.sourceforge.net/.
Primarily intended top build a self controlled model helicopter (sort of
UAV),
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
Initial Mail: http://www.geocrawler.com/lists/3/SourceForge/15951/0/8054454/
CVS: :pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/autopilot checkout sim
Screenshot: http://autopilot.sourceforge.net/images/sim.04.png (with some
code 'borrowed' from OpenGC)
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly -
Any words on how to model (edit) your favorite 'airport.btg.gz' file?
Do you want to 'add' objects or change something about the
automatically generated runway and taxiway model.
I for instance would like to add some lights to my favourite home airport,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly
Martin Spott writes:
I for instance would like to add some lights to my favourite home airport,
Are you talking about standard runway and approach lighting, or other
types of lighting.
I'd be happy if I at least could add simple runway lighting as you did for
KSFO. I don't need more
The problems people have with the xBSD have nothing to do with FGFS.
Once you've got all the dependencies (i.e. GL, PLIB, MK, etc) working,
You might get in trouble with some graphics boards that are not supported by
XFree86/DRI. I know that there is a project to build something that is
FWIW on a SuSE 7.3 system I had to downgrade (install parallel actually)
autoconf. Just pointing out SuSE needed a little tweak too.
I would'nt call it that way. Autoconf on SuSE-7.3 works pretty nice. The
only tweak is that you have to run 'aclocal' with '-I .'. I know this
because I do build
I'd like to define a new airport. How can I do that ? Is there any paper
talking about it ?
There is FlightGear/docs-mini/AptNavFAQ.FlightGear.html with lots of useful
information but I have the impression that you need to regenerate scenery at
this location to include the new airport.
http://www.suse.com/us/products/suse_linux/i386/games.html
Yep, I've been pushing them a bit to make a build of the new release of
FlightGear :-)
Unfortunately this will not include all the nice stuff that went in in the
meantime (c310 crashes on gear retraction ;-). I'll figure out how
Interesting note, the top item on the list, Racer is not GPL or anything
close to opensource ( see http://www.racer.nl/legal.htm ). It also uses
[...]
Yep, the also ship near to commercial software with their distribution - at
least on CD-ROM. Anyway you will find such sort of software on
Interesting note, the top item on the list, Racer is not GPL or anything
close to opensource ( see http://www.racer.nl/legal.htm ).
I totally forgot Are you (Alex) using an Nvidia graphics board ? O.k.,
as I remember you do not. But many pople on this list do. So there seems to
be very
so we can run for example ./configure --with-nvidia-ext
I'd like to mention that I have strong feelings against use of proprietary,
single vendor extensions in the main source tree,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
Try a new CVS checkout of SimGear and see if the problem is still
there.
Already done that. Looks fine - thanks for the patch,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--
Someone here uses gcc on IRIX, right? Anything to mention
as far as how well it works there? Compatibility problems
with anything?
I do. Works quite nice with common Unix/GNU utilities. I was proud I
succeeded in building a N64 GCC, but unfortunately this one was not able to
build
One other nit: retracting the gear while sitting on the runway doesn't
work like it should. :-)
I'm happy that is works as it does now, because I don't get an airplane
crash when I forget the gear before landing :-)
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who
I've now modified the property-manager interface to use const char *
instead of std::string throughout the public interface [...]
I have the impression that the flaps are gone. I try to set the flaps via
], I can see the lever moving over the panel but I can't 'feel' the flaps
and they don't
JSBSim is no longer setting the /surface-positions/flaps-norm
property, so the flaps don't move in the animation and don't make a
sound. The position is still set correctly in /controls/flaps, [...]
There are still no flaps in JSBSim's c310. The lever is moving on the panel
but there's no
Is this with the most recent JSBSim? Tony made some changes related to
properties and perhaps there is some tweaking to do.
The checkout is about five hours old,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
The fix is in JSBSim CVS [...]
Oh, that's great news. Sorry for pushing you on this, I didn't know the bug
was already spotted,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--
From: Alex Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I don't know whether the IIC has the Pro feature set (suspect not).
If it does, the Mach64 driver of Utah-GLX works fine for me.
You might want to have a look at recent DRI development. I'm following this
already for a while and it appears to me that the
Is it possible (under Unix/Linux) to run fgfs directly from
a console and let it access the DRI?
http://fbdri.sourceforge.net/
ATI Radeon only, I might have a try some time,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
[... Erik wrote ...]
Alex Perry wrote:
In Britain, as far as I know, we always use two-digit numbers
Nope, not in the US. Dunno about elsewhere.
I think it's the same in Europe as it is in Brittain.
Right - seen this last week at EDWJ,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just
From: Erik Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
When trying to compile the latest UIUC code I got the following error
for about a hundred times:
[...]
What are you using to compile it? It compiles fine with gcc version 2.96
under Redhat 7.1.
Erik an I are the ones that form the SGI group in this
Ok, people, please have a look at
rsync scenery.flightgear.org::Base
and tell me what you think.
Very nice, indeed,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--
After digging through several README's, FAQ's and Robin's manual I decided
to have a rough try with my so much desired airport.
I did some calculation and then I added two lines to the default.apt(.gz)
file for a minimal airport definition - to have a 'proof of concept' before
I start working on
[... Madr wrote ...]
On Thu 4. April 2002 00:58, you wrote:
sirius: 0:55:17 ~ fgfs
[...]
Attempting to set starting position from runway code FX01 heading 270
Failed to find FX01 in database.
[...]
IMHO You also need to update metakit databases runways.mk4 and simple.mk4,
but I don't
$FG_SRC / src / Airports /
gensimple
genrunways
Thanks, this works fine. Now I'm rebuilding the relevant parts of the
scenery - looks promising
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
Thanks, this works fine. Now I'm rebuilding the relevant parts of the
scenery - looks promising
O.k., I give up with scenery. I manage to create the runway but I didn't
manage to create scenery with the hole that is necessary to see the runway.
Nice try ;-)
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user
This doesn't mean much to me but it may be of some use. I have a
feeling though that your compiler may be too old to compile boost. Is
gcc 2.95 an option?
Erik put _huge_ effort into the project because GCC is definitely _no_
option on IRIX/MIPS. I know what I'm talking about because I
Martin Spott writes:
function `posix_openpty':
posixmodule.o(.text+0x15c3): undefined reference to `openpty'
/usr/lib/python2.1/config/libpython2.1.a(posixmodule.o): In
function `posix_forkpty':
posixmodule.o(.text+0x163d): undefined reference to `forkpty'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
I think a series of demos would be a great idea. It would also be nice if
there were demos for various terrain types (stress testing). I fly around
the Seattle area simply because the mountains drastically impact frame
rate.
Not only the mountains. ATIS display has _heavy_ impact. I
Thanks to Jim Wilson, we have a working tower view in CVS: [...]
Wow, this one is incredibly good,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--
On Monday 08 April 2002 07:41 am, you wrote:
Not only the mountains. ATIS display has _heavy_ impact. I usually get
around 100 fps inside a 800x600 window (BETA Radeon DRI driver, only 40 fps
left at 1600x1024 ), at KSEA I only get 30-50 fps because of ATIS
display (with today's current
This driver has lots of neat new features OpenGL 2.0
Do they really implement the upcoming OpenGL-2.0 features in hardware or do
they tend to rely on fallbacks ? It's somewhat astonishing that they already
provide a driver for a still not really existent OpenGL standard. Do they
create their
but 2.0 is in part a 'rconciliation' of the various 'propriatary' extensions
and the inclusion of things that almost all of the manufacturers have done
to support M$oft DX#. And this driver has more of these upcoming features
then any of the previous ones.
So this driver is Nvidia's tool to
make[4]: Entering directory `/usr/local/src/FlightGear/src/FDM/JSBSim'
g++ -DFGFS -I../../.. -I../../../src -I/opt/gnu/include -I/usr/local/include
-I/usr/local/FlightGear/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -O3 -D_REENTRANT -c JSBSim.cxx
JSBSim.cxx: In method `bool FGJSBsim::copy_to_JSBsim()':
[... Andrew Ross wrote ...]
Here's a gedanken experiment [...]
A _what_ ? Is this a valid word in your language ? I'm asking because it
definitely has german roots, the word 'gedanken' That's funny,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
Hello alltogether,
would you mind changing this back to the previous behaviour which means not
to crash if there's no model description. Unfortunalety I've been off scene
for a few days so it's not quite clear to me when the change happened.
I was trying the Beech99 in the hope to see a working
Anyone up for a 0.7.10 release sometime soon?
I wouldn't object a 0.7.10 release as long as where were at least two or
three weeks for fixing obvious known bugs that prevent users from using
functionality that is _supposed_ to be usuable right now (see my posting on
the Beech99).
In the
I used getstarted.pdf to learn to compile flightgear.
This is very nice to hear, so we know there really _are_ people reding our
manual ;-)
Something missing in this pdf is that one has to install
Xfree86
Metakit
Hmmm, I believe it is _really_ obvious that yoy need X11 for FlightGear.
It would be nice to get a CVS version that all the developers agree
will compile and run on their systems, then (arbitrarily) label it 0.7.10
Maybe it would be useful to label this 0.7.10 release as feature rich but
unstable (considering several pieces are broken that have been working in
PS: Who's already planning to come?
I am preparing to come - if this is of any use,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--
props.cxx:834: Internal Compiler Error in 'output_die', at
dwarf2out.c:5433
[...]
The compiler is GCC 2.95.3
Can anybody explain how this can be solved ?
By avoiding GCC on IRIX. I had several tries with GCC at release 0.7.8 and I
never succeeded because of compiler errors. I started filing
http://www.megginson.com/flightsim/tree.png
[...]
2. While other scenery shows through the alpha parts of the texture,
the sky often doesn't, as you can see in the above screenshot (note
how you can see the grass and river near the bottom of the trunk, but
not the sky near the
fgfs --wind=270@15 --prop:/environment/params/gust-wind-speed-kt=25
H, not bad. This one is nasty - but very interesting. I don't even
manage to touch down right on the runway - similar to my first experiences
with FlightGear
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just
we used to fall back to the glider model
I mentioned this problem already several weeks ago but nobody was interested
in it. Now as the subject comes up again I'd second the desire for a
fallback to the glider - as we were used to have before for very long time,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user
I've fixed the missing model problem -- specifying a non-existant
aircraft model (not any other kind) will default to the glider again
rather than throwing an exception.
Thanks,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
For what it's worth, I'm involved in a side project that is using
FlightGear + a commercial C172 flight dynamics model + cockpit
hardware to hopefully achieve an FAA (and JAR) certified sim by late
summer / early fall. The commercial fdm will run as a seperate
program [...]
Hmm, _this_
I just went round to the SuSE booth and looked on a 8.0 demo computer.
The packaged version is 0.7.8 which we released last summer, a year ago.
Ooops, I was quite shure they packaged a 0.7.9 for SuSE-8.0.
I still think it would be worth submitting a formal request that
the future SuSE 8.1
Slightly off topic, but I found the following post from Sunday on
dri-devel:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=772607forum_id=7177
Apparently, ATI have released (binary) Linux drivers for their FireGL
8700/8800 cards. These use the same core as the Radeon 8500, and
* Jon S Berndt -- Thursday 20 June 2002 18:14:
Any chance someone could post some screen shots of the
panel?
http://www.unet.univie.ac.at/~a8603365/fgfs4.jpeg
I get that, too. What I'm missing in recent releases is display of the gear
in the outside view and keyboard control of throttle
Martin Spott wrote:
I get that, too. What I'm missing in recent releases is display of the
gear in the outside view and keyboard control of throttle and
flaps. This appeared to be introduced the the recent A-4 updates in
YASim. Can anyone confirm ?
Works for me. Are you sure you have
wondering why my A4 stay steady on the ground with gear retracted, [...]
Ah, we already had this 'feature' last week. This appears to depend on
Adrew's panel updates. Thanks for the fix,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
1 - 100 of 1427 matches
Mail list logo