Re: [Flightgear-devel] New aircraft ideas ?
On June 24, 2005 11:39 am, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > > Got an idea for a new aircraft (not airplane) you'd like to try ? > > http://www.dodsbir.net/Topics/Default.asp > > Topic: A05-208 > > ..concerns "semiballistic 40-105 mm munitions with enhanced lethality > capable of striking targets of opportunity along the modifiable > ballistic trajectory." > > ..I'd like to see such devices make full use of the 4 Geneva Conventions > to save lives and instead maximize combat damage to the enemy, as > wounded men are about 4 to 5 times more expensive to any military force > than dead men. A successful small arms femur shot takes a year to heal > back into combatworthy status. Agreed. If I have any new idea, I will certainly not submit it to any Department of Offense. Ampere ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
Re: [Flightgear-devel] New aircraft ideas ?
Le vendredi 24 juin 2005 à 17:39 +0200, Arnt Karlsen a écrit : > On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 17:26:40 -0700 (PDT), Alex wrote in message > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Got an idea for a new aircraft (not airplane) you'd like to try ? > > http://www.dodsbir.net/Topics/Default.asp > > Topic: A05-208 > > ...concerns "semiballistic 40-105 mm munitions with enhanced lethality > capable of striking targets of opportunity along the modifiable > ballistic trajectory." > > ...I'd like to see such devices make full use of the 4 Geneva Conventions > to save lives and instead maximize combat damage to the enemy, as > wounded men are about 4 to 5 times more expensive to any military force > than dead men. A successful small arms femur shot takes a year to heal > back into combatworthy status. > Yea, It was "New aircraft ideas" :=( -- Gerard ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
Re: [Flightgear-devel] New aircraft ideas ?
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 17:26:40 -0700 (PDT), Alex wrote in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Got an idea for a new aircraft (not airplane) you'd like to try ? > http://www.dodsbir.net/Topics/Default.asp > Topic: A05-208 ..concerns "semiballistic 40-105 mm munitions with enhanced lethality capable of striking targets of opportunity along the modifiable ballistic trajectory." ..I'd like to see such devices make full use of the 4 Geneva Conventions to save lives and instead maximize combat damage to the enemy, as wounded men are about 4 to 5 times more expensive to any military force than dead men. A successful small arms femur shot takes a year to heal back into combatworthy status. -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o) ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case. ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
[Flightgear-devel] New aircraft ideas ?
Got an idea for a new aircraft (not airplane) you'd like to try ? http://www.dodsbir.net/Topics/Default.asp Topic: A05-208 ___ Flightgear-devel mailing list Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel 2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
