[Flightgear-devel] Re: gear/flaps handling (b29, hurricane, ...)

2005-06-22 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Gerard Robin -- Wednesday 22 June 2005 16:44: Le mercredi 22 juin 2005 à 16:03 +0200, Melchior FRANZ a écrit : The default controls functions ignore this additional information and should exactly behave as before. If i need to keep the old process, what

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: gear/flaps handling (b29, hurricane, ...)

2005-06-22 Thread Gerard Robin
Le mercredi 22 juin 2005 à 18:44 +0200, Melchior FRANZ a écrit : * Gerard Robin -- Wednesday 22 June 2005 16:44: Le mercredi 22 juin 2005 à 16:03 +0200, Melchior FRANZ a écrit : The default controls functions ignore this additional information and should exactly behave as before.

[Flightgear-devel] Re: gear/flaps handling (b29, hurricane, ...)

2005-06-22 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Gerard Robin -- Wednesday 22 June 2005 18:46: Le mercredi 22 juin 2005 à 16:44 +0200, Gerard Robin a écrit : If i need to keep the old process, what must be done on my side ? In addition to my previous question which is waiting for an answer. I thought I had answered that by underlining

[Flightgear-devel] Re: gear/flaps handling (b29, hurricane, ...)

2005-06-22 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Melchior FRANZ -- Wednesday 22 June 2005 19:44: * Gerard Robin -- Wednesday 22 June 2005 18:46: Is it any consequence when using interpolation ? No. Oh, you mean the XML interpolation. That is even less concerned ... m. ___ Flightgear-devel

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: gear/flaps handling (b29, hurricane, ...)

2005-06-22 Thread Gerard Robin
Le mercredi 22 juin 2005 à 19:54 +0200, Melchior FRANZ a écrit : * Melchior FRANZ -- Wednesday 22 June 2005 19:44: * Gerard Robin -- Wednesday 22 June 2005 18:46: Is it any consequence when using interpolation ? No. Oh, you mean the XML interpolation. That is even less concerned

[Flightgear-devel] Re: gear/flaps handling (b29, hurricane, ...)

2005-06-22 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Gerard Robin -- Wednesday 22 June 2005 20:54: Le mercredi 22 juin 2005 à 19:54 +0200, Melchior FRANZ a écrit : Oh, you mean the XML interpolation. That is even less concerned ... Thank, that is i hoped to ear . I don't even know why I answered such a nonsense question. How realistic is it

RE: [Flightgear-devel] Re: gear/flaps handling (b29, hurricane, ...)

2005-06-22 Thread Vivian Meazza
Melchior And this is by no means innovative. Andy had done this for several control functions already. Just a few were/are missing. What is new is the fact that the default bindings for gear and flaps do now also report key/button release. This is required for gear/flaps without defined

RE: [Flightgear-devel] Re: gear/flaps handling (b29, hurricane, ...)

2005-06-22 Thread Giles Robertson
BEFORE: kbd binding--\ | property js binding---/ NOW (and since a while for flaps and many others): kbd binding\

Re: [Flightgear-devel] Re: gear/flaps handling (b29, hurricane, ...)

2005-06-22 Thread Gerard Robin
Le mercredi 22 juin 2005 à 21:21 +0200, Melchior FRANZ a écrit : * Gerard Robin -- Wednesday 22 June 2005 20:54: Le mercredi 22 juin 2005 à 19:54 +0200, Melchior FRANZ a écrit : Oh, you mean the XML interpolation. That is even less concerned ... Thank, that is i hoped to ear . I

[Flightgear-devel] Re: gear/flaps handling (b29, hurricane, ...)

2005-06-22 Thread Melchior FRANZ
* Giles Robertson -- Wednesday 22 June 2005 21:58: If this were extended to all controls, then it could be used as an abstraction for key bindings, Except that only a part of the bindings is Nasal-based. which would allow us to deal with the kb localisation issues that were mentioned