Are we going to look into removing some of the aircrafts in the base package?
Ampere
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
On Freitag 24 Dezember 2004 12:00, Ronny Standtke wrote:
It would be great if as many people as possible could download this
pre-release and give it a try and let us know if there are any problems.
After a long time not using fgfs I tested this version and run straight
into a small problem:
On Wednesday 29 Dec 2004 20:17, Mathias Frhlich wrote:
On Mittwoch 29 Dezember 2004 20:59, Mathias Frhlich wrote:
But anyway, at the moment the c172 does not work either with the current
data directory.
From the data directory
Aircraft/c172p/Models/c172p-int-02.rgb
seems to be missing?
On Wednesday 29 December 2004 20:59, Mathias Frhlich wrote:
On Freitag 24 Dezember 2004 12:00, Ronny Standtke wrote:
It would be great if as many people as possible could download this
pre-release and give it a try and let us know if there are any
problems.
After a long time not
Durk Talsma wrote:
On Tuesday 28 December 2004 01:24, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 16:40:39 +0100, Durk wrote in message
Okay, fixed these. Took not nearly as much time as I thought it
should. I just send a patch to Erik.
..you missed FlightGear-0.9/source/scripts/java/Makfefile.am,
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 10:05:38 +0100, Erik wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Durk Talsma wrote:
On Tuesday 28 December 2004 01:24, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 16:40:39 +0100, Durk wrote in message
Okay, fixed these. Took not nearly as much time as I thought it
should. I
On Tuesday 28 December 2004 10:05, Erik Hofman wrote:
Durk Talsma wrote:
On Tuesday 28 December 2004 01:24, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 16:40:39 +0100, Durk wrote in message
Okay, fixed these. Took not nearly as much time as I thought it
should. I just send a patch to Erik.
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..it _is_ correctly named after all??? ;-)
Since you have nothing useful to say ...
Erik
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Durk Talsma wrote:
Notice that the filename in question
(FlightGear-0.9/source/scripts/java/Makfefile.am) is named Makfefile.am
instead of Makefile.am (notice the extra f after the 'k' in the name), which
I guess is not what this file is supposed to be called.
I never got an error message
On Wednesday 22 December 2004 21:55, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
The first prerelease of FlightGear-0.9.8 and SimGear-0.3.8 are available
for download. Please see their respective web sites for details:
http://www.flightgear.org
http://www.simgear.org
It would be great if as many people
On Monday 27 December 2004 14:56, Durk Talsma wrote:
FYI: Thanks to Innis Cunningham, I found a few non-portable pathnames in
FlightGear thatI would like to fix before the next release. I'll do my best
to fix these before the next release, but I may need a day or two.
Okay, fixed these. Took
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 16:40:39 +0100, Durk wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Monday 27 December 2004 14:56, Durk Talsma wrote:
FYI: Thanks to Innis Cunningham, I found a few non-portable
pathnames in FlightGear thatI would like to fix before the next
release. I'll do my best to fix
On Tuesday 28 December 2004 01:24, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 16:40:39 +0100, Durk wrote in message
Okay, fixed these. Took not nearly as much time as I thought it
should. I just send a patch to Erik.
..you missed FlightGear-0.9/source/scripts/java/Makfefile.am,
looks rather
Chris Metzler wrote:
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 10:28:23 -0600
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
I'm sure I'm using plib-1.8.3 here without problems. Anyone else seeing
a problem?
I'm currently dloading, to see what the status is of CVS bugs discussed
here recently . . .
A full set of pre1 tarballs builds
Jon Stockill
Chris Metzler wrote:
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 10:28:23 -0600
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
I'm sure I'm using plib-1.8.3 here without problems. Anyone else seeing
a problem?
I'm currently dloading, to see what the status is of CVS bugs discussed
here recently . . .
A
On Friday 24 Dec 2004 11:00, Ronny Standtke wrote:
It would be great if as many people as possible could download this
pre-release and give it a try and let us know if there are any problems.
After a long time not using fgfs I tested this version and run straight
into a small problem:
Dave Martin wrote:
On Friday 24 Dec 2004 11:00, Ronny Standtke wrote:
It would be great if as many people as possible could download this
pre-release and give it a try and let us know if there are any
problems.
After a long time not using fgfs I tested this version and run straight
On Friday 24 Dec 2004 15:31, Vivian Meazza wrote:
If you think that it's good enough for release forward it to Erik Hoffman
or Curt. I think it could make the upcoming release, especially if it
corrects some known bugs.
Regards,
Vivian
___
Vivian Meazza wrote:
Curt has stated the policy of only using the released version of plib etc.
This makes sense to me. That decision really only affects the 'crease' in
our models - the released version of the data cannot include them. And, as
you said, we miss out on the significant performance
Jon Stockill
Vivian Meazza wrote:
Curt has stated the policy of only using the released version of plib
etc.
This makes sense to me. That decision really only affects the 'crease'
in
our models - the released version of the data cannot include them. And,
as
you said, we miss out
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
The first prerelease of FlightGear-0.9.8 and SimGear-0.3.8 are available
for download. Please see their respective web sites for details:
Strange errors over here and I currently don't know the reason. Two
possibilities:
1.) pre1 doesn't work with the current base
Martin Spott wrote:
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
The first prerelease of FlightGear-0.9.8 and SimGear-0.3.8 are available
for download. Please see their respective web sites for details:
Strange errors over here and I currently don't know the reason. Two
possibilities:
1.) pre1 doesn't work
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 10:28:23 -0600
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
I'm sure I'm using plib-1.8.3 here without problems. Anyone else seeing
a problem?
I'm currently dloading, to see what the status is of CVS bugs discussed
here recently . . .
-c
--
Chris Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Yah, pre1 needs the pre1 base package since I changed the apt.dat.gz
stuff afterwards.
O.k., I assume this will be the reason - I didn't expect you to make
such a change _after_ the pre-release ;-)
Cheers,
Martin.
P.S.: Any Windows-binary out there ?
--
Unix
24 matches
Mail list logo
