On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 09:59:41 +0200, Boris Koenig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm bringing this back up again, because during my search for
cross-platform capable ATC multiplayer software I stumbled
across the following comment on http://www.atcsimulator.com
[QUOTE:]
August 19, 2004 -
I wonder what would happen if some unaware pilot cuts the cable of an
actively used cable railway in the Alps because of the lack of
information.
He he...
You mean like the US air force a few years ago?
Peter
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Peter L wrote:
I wonder what would happen if some unaware pilot cuts the cable of an
actively used cable railway in the Alps because of the lack of
information.
He he...
You mean like the US air force a few years ago?
Was it the USAF? I couldn't remember anymore, just that it happened..
Erik
Was it the USAF? I couldn't remember anymore, just that it happened..
Actually, marines. Very unfortunate accident in clear weather in 1998 in
Italy. US marine training flight, the plane returned with some damage.
The route was a well used one, but it appears they flew lower than normal.
Jim Wilson wrote:
Ah...oh. H. What is the AIP? I hadn't read government into that
first posting at all, but maybe there was a typo. If it is the RAAF or Aussie
government in some form, this could be a serious problem for information on
the web, that goes a bit beyond this one data set.
- Original Message -
From: David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FlightGear developers discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 13, 2004 5:27 AM
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] ALERT: Losing the DAFIF
Jim Wilson wrote:
Ah...oh. H. What is the AIP? I hadn't read government
David Megginson said:
Chris Metzler wrote:
Is there an official announcement of this somewhere? I've looked all
around the NGA and NACO sites but haven't found anything. How did he
hear about this? Is there any kind of timetable? Were there reasons
stated?
According to the
David Megginson said:
Lee Elliott wrote:
I'm pretty sure that information/data can't be copyrighted - but the
design of
the presentation of the information/data can.
I hope not, but every country has its own (bizarre) laws about this kind of
thing -- for example, in Commonwealth
Hi All
Here is the information if anyone wants to read it.
http://www.avweb.com/bizav/10_04/news/186538-1.html
David Megginson writes
Chris Metzler wrote:
Is there an official announcement of this somewhere? I've looked all
around the NGA and NACO sites but haven't found anything. How did he
David Megginson wrote:
Before I bash Oz any more, I'll repeat the problem that Garmin had with
my own government recently. The Garmin 296 handheld GPS includes
terrain obstructions (such as towers), which could save of lives;
however, the Canadian government refused to provide obstruction
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 11:20:28 -0400
David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This message just came to one of the aviation newsgroups from Paul
Tomblin, who maintains several free GPS/flight-planning databases. It
looks like we'll be losing the DAFIF soon, which is our source for most
Chris Metzler wrote:
Is there an official announcement of this somewhere? I've looked all
around the NGA and NACO sites but haven't found anything. How did he
hear about this? Is there any kind of timetable? Were there reasons
stated?
According to the message I quoted, the Australian
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 15:19:15 -0400
David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chris Metzler wrote:
Is there an official announcement of this somewhere? I've looked all
around the NGA and NACO sites but haven't found anything. How did he
hear about this? Is there any kind of timetable?
On Tuesday 10 August 2004 20:19, David Megginson wrote:
Chris Metzler wrote:
Is there an official announcement of this somewhere? I've looked all
around the NGA and NACO sites but haven't found anything. How did he
hear about this? Is there any kind of timetable? Were there reasons
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 20:58:15 +0100
Lee Elliott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm pretty sure that information/data can't be copyrighted - but the
design of the presentation of the information/data can.
You'd think so, wouldn't you? And traditionally, that's been the
opinion of U.S. courts -- that
Lee Elliott wrote:
I'm pretty sure that information/data can't be copyrighted - but the design of
the presentation of the information/data can.
I hope not, but every country has its own (bizarre) laws about this kind of
thing -- for example, in Commonwealth countries, including Canada and
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 18:01:38 -0400, David wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Lee Elliott wrote:
I'm pretty sure that information/data can't be copyrighted - but the
design of the presentation of the information/data can.
I hope not, but every country has its own (bizarre) laws about
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..so, in Canada, copyright is more important than lives.
This has been in the media? They usually love to roast
governments over stuff like this. ;-)
COPA's done its best, but the issue is not going anywhere. On the bright
side, while the copyright law in Canada does not
18 matches
Mail list logo
