On Monday 17 January 2005 11:40, Erik Hofman wrote:
> Oliver C. wrote:
> > In this case it depends on the following:
> > Does a definition get not defined when a value is missing?
>
> Not anymore, I have committed a patch that ignores platforms that re not
> specified within the >number></number> section.
>
> This is a heads up for all joystick users:
> I have thought of possible problems with this, but the only one I
> could think of is when <axis n=""> is defined for platforms that are not
> defined within the <number></number> section.
>
> !! This is bas behavior and should be corrected !!
>
Sounds okay for me.
But what about such a solution:
<axis>
<desc>View Elevation</desc>
<number>
<unix>5</unix>
<windows>7</windows>
</number>
<low>
<repeatable>true</repeatable>
<binding>
<command>property-adjust</command>
<property>/sim/current-view/goal-pitch-offset-deg</property>
<windows>
<step type="double">-1.0</step>
</windows>
<unix>
<step type="double">1.0</step>
</unix>
</binding>
</low>
<high>
<repeatable>true</repeatable>
<binding>
<command>property-adjust</command>
<property>/sim/current-view/goal-pitch-offset-deg</property>
<windows>
<step type="double">1.0</step>
</windows>
<unix>
<step type="double">-1.0</step>
</unix>
</binding>
</high>
</axis>
Could that be implemented?
IMO it is cleaner and more intuitive.
(intuitive because it was the first thing, that i tried by try and error
to make the axis inverted. :) )
Or what about this one?
<binding>
<command>property-adjust</command>
<property>/sim/current-view/goal-pitch-offset-deg</property>
<step type="double">
<windows>-1.0<windows>
<unix>1.0</unix>
</step>
</binding>
Is it possible to implement such a behaviour?
Best Regards,
Oliver C.
_______________________________________________
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
2f585eeea02e2c79d7b1d8c4963bae2d
